Quality of care in mental health services: does patient engagement play a role?

Muhammad Sabbir Rahman, Md Afnan Hossain, Md Rifayat Islam Rushan, Hasliza Hassan, Vishal Talwar
{"title":"Quality of care in mental health services: does patient engagement play a role?","authors":"Muhammad Sabbir Rahman, Md Afnan Hossain, Md Rifayat Islam Rushan, Hasliza Hassan, Vishal Talwar","doi":"10.1108/ijqrm-10-2021-0373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe mental healthcare is experiencing an ever-growing surge in understanding the consumer (e.g., patient) engagement paradox, aiming to vouch for the quality of care. Despite this surge, scant attention has been given in academia to conceptualize and empirically investigate this particular aspect. Thus, drawing on the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) paradigm, the study explores how patients engage with healthcare service providers and how they perceive the quality of the healthcare services.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from 279 respondents, and the derived conceptual model was tested by using Smart PLS 3.2.7 and PROCESS. To complement the findings of partial least squares (PLS)-based structural equation modeling (SEM), the present study also applied fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to identify the necessary and sufficient conditions to explore substitute conjunctive paths that emerge.FindingsFindings show that patients’ perceived intimacy (PI), cohesion and privacy enhance the quality of mental healthcare service providers. The results also suggest that patients’ PI, cohesion and privacy have indirect effects on the perceived quality of care (PQC) by the service providers through consumer engagement. The fsQCA results derive that the relationship among conditions leading to patients’ perception of the quality of care in regard to mental healthcare service providers is complex and is best reflected as multiple and conjectural causation configurations.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings from this research contribute to the advancement of studies on patients’ experiences by empirically examining the unique dynamics of interaction between consumers (patients) and mental healthcare service providers, thereby enriching both the literature on social interactions and the understanding of the consumer–provider relationship.Practical implicationsThe results of this study provide practical implications for mental healthcare service providers on how to combine the study variables to enhance the quality of care and satisfy more patients.Originality/valueA significant research gap has ascertained the inter-relationship between PI, cohesion, privacy, engagement and PQC from the perspective of mental healthcare service providers. This research is one of the primary studies from a managerial and methodological standpoint. The study contributes by combining symmetric and asymmetric statistical tools in service marketing and healthcare research. Furthermore, the application of fsQCA helps to understand the interactions that might not be immediately obvious through traditional symmetric methods.","PeriodicalId":506639,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqrm-10-2021-0373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe mental healthcare is experiencing an ever-growing surge in understanding the consumer (e.g., patient) engagement paradox, aiming to vouch for the quality of care. Despite this surge, scant attention has been given in academia to conceptualize and empirically investigate this particular aspect. Thus, drawing on the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) paradigm, the study explores how patients engage with healthcare service providers and how they perceive the quality of the healthcare services.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from 279 respondents, and the derived conceptual model was tested by using Smart PLS 3.2.7 and PROCESS. To complement the findings of partial least squares (PLS)-based structural equation modeling (SEM), the present study also applied fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to identify the necessary and sufficient conditions to explore substitute conjunctive paths that emerge.FindingsFindings show that patients’ perceived intimacy (PI), cohesion and privacy enhance the quality of mental healthcare service providers. The results also suggest that patients’ PI, cohesion and privacy have indirect effects on the perceived quality of care (PQC) by the service providers through consumer engagement. The fsQCA results derive that the relationship among conditions leading to patients’ perception of the quality of care in regard to mental healthcare service providers is complex and is best reflected as multiple and conjectural causation configurations.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings from this research contribute to the advancement of studies on patients’ experiences by empirically examining the unique dynamics of interaction between consumers (patients) and mental healthcare service providers, thereby enriching both the literature on social interactions and the understanding of the consumer–provider relationship.Practical implicationsThe results of this study provide practical implications for mental healthcare service providers on how to combine the study variables to enhance the quality of care and satisfy more patients.Originality/valueA significant research gap has ascertained the inter-relationship between PI, cohesion, privacy, engagement and PQC from the perspective of mental healthcare service providers. This research is one of the primary studies from a managerial and methodological standpoint. The study contributes by combining symmetric and asymmetric statistical tools in service marketing and healthcare research. Furthermore, the application of fsQCA helps to understand the interactions that might not be immediately obvious through traditional symmetric methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理健康服务的护理质量:患者参与是否起作用?
目的心理医疗保健领域正在经历一场日益增长的了解消费者(如患者)参与悖论的热潮,旨在为医疗保健的质量提供担保。尽管如此,学术界却很少关注这一特殊方面的概念化和实证研究。因此,本研究借鉴了刺激-组织-反应(S-O-R)范式,探讨了患者如何与医疗服务提供者接触,以及他们如何看待医疗服务的质量。为了补充基于偏最小二乘法(PLS)的结构方程模型(SEM)的研究结果,本研究还应用了模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)来确定必要条件和充分条件,以探索出现的替代性共轭路径。研究结果研究结果表明,患者感知到的亲密感(PI)、凝聚力和隐私会提高精神医疗服务提供者的服务质量。结果还表明,患者的亲密感、凝聚力和隐私会通过消费者的参与间接影响服务提供者感知到的医疗质量(PQC)。研究局限/意义本研究的结果通过实证研究消费者(患者)与精神医疗服务提供者之间独特的互动动态,从而丰富了有关社会互动的文献以及对消费者与服务提供者关系的理解,有助于推动有关患者体验的研究。实践意义本研究的结果为心理医疗服务提供者提供了如何结合研究变量来提高医疗质量和满足更多患者需求的实践意义。 原创性/价值从心理医疗服务提供者的角度出发,确定个人参与、凝聚力、隐私、参与和 PQC 之间的相互关系是一项重要的研究空白。从管理和方法论的角度来看,本研究是最主要的研究之一。本研究将服务营销和医疗保健研究中的对称和非对称统计工具结合起来,为研究做出了贡献。此外,fsQCA 的应用有助于理解传统对称方法可能无法立即显现的互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How does service quality predict loyalty? The serial mediation effects of perceived value and consumer brand identification Analysis of barriers for adopting blockchain in agri-food supply chain management: a decision support framework Unraveling the interplay between supply chain analytics and healthcare supply chain performance: establishing an underlying mechanism and a boundary condition The mediation role of innovation in the relationship between total quality management and performance of small and medium scale enterprises Lean thinking and risk management in healthcare organizations: a systematic literature review and research agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1