Queen Mab and the Origins of Economic Value

IF 0.3 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE Romanticism Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.3366/rom.2024.0629
Paul Stephens
{"title":"Queen Mab and the Origins of Economic Value","authors":"Paul Stephens","doi":"10.3366/rom.2024.0629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholarship on Shelley’s economic thought has long acknowledged his embrace of the labour theory of value. This essay offers a more probing account of the poet’s investigations into the origins of economic value. Focusing on Queen Mab (1813), it situates Shelley’s value theory in relation to competing theories and examines his engagement with his cited sources, including works by Jean-Jacques Rousseau and William Godwin. It argues that Shelley moves beyond this work to encompass unacknowledged sources, including John Locke’s theory of property rights and Adam Smith’s discussion of value in the Wealth of Nations, enabling him to formulate his own version of the pure labour theory of value. The essay thus provides a richer examination of the philosophical foundations of Shelley’s early economic thought, connecting these ideas to aspects of his ethics and epistemology.","PeriodicalId":42939,"journal":{"name":"Romanticism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/rom.2024.0629","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholarship on Shelley’s economic thought has long acknowledged his embrace of the labour theory of value. This essay offers a more probing account of the poet’s investigations into the origins of economic value. Focusing on Queen Mab (1813), it situates Shelley’s value theory in relation to competing theories and examines his engagement with his cited sources, including works by Jean-Jacques Rousseau and William Godwin. It argues that Shelley moves beyond this work to encompass unacknowledged sources, including John Locke’s theory of property rights and Adam Smith’s discussion of value in the Wealth of Nations, enabling him to formulate his own version of the pure labour theory of value. The essay thus provides a richer examination of the philosophical foundations of Shelley’s early economic thought, connecting these ideas to aspects of his ethics and epistemology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玛布王后与经济价值的起源
长期以来,有关雪莱经济思想的学术研究都承认他接受了劳动价值论。本文对诗人对经济价值起源的研究进行了更深入的阐述。文章以《玛布王后》(1813 年)为重点,将雪莱的价值理论与其他理论相比较,并研究了他与所引用的资料来源的关系,包括让-雅克-卢梭和威廉-戈德温的作品。文章认为,雪莱超越了这些著作,吸收了一些未被认可的资料来源,包括约翰-洛克的产权理论和亚当-斯密在《国富论》中对价值的讨论,使他能够提出自己版本的纯劳动价值论。因此,这篇文章对雪莱早期经济思想的哲学基础进行了更丰富的研究,并将这些思想与他的伦理学和认识论联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Romanticism
Romanticism LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The most distinguished scholarly journal of its kind edited and published in Britain, Romanticism offers a forum for the flourishing diversity of Romantic studies today. Focusing on the period 1750-1850, it publishes critical, historical, textual and bibliographical essays prepared to the highest scholarly standards, reflecting the full range of current methodological and theoretical debate. With an extensive reviews section, Romanticism constitutes a vital international arena for scholarly debate in this liveliest field of literary studies.
期刊最新文献
Alexander Freer, Wordsworth’s Unremembered Pleasure John Keats, Jane Taylor, and Poetic Ambition Eden, Arcadia, and the Death of Poetry in John Keats’s Ode on Indolence Stephanie Insley Hershinow, Born Yesterday: Inexperience in the Early Realist Novel Keats and The Stranger at Inveraray
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1