Cross-Cultural Comparison of Mood Perception During Initial Pandemic Response

IF 0.7 Q4 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Disaster Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.20965/jdr.2024.p0396
Karri Flinkman, Claudio Feliciani, Hwajin Lim, Hiroki Kuroha, Sae Kondo, Chikako Goto, Hideki Koizumi
{"title":"Cross-Cultural Comparison of Mood Perception During Initial Pandemic Response","authors":"Karri Flinkman, Claudio Feliciani, Hwajin Lim, Hiroki Kuroha, Sae Kondo, Chikako Goto, Hideki Koizumi","doi":"10.20965/jdr.2024.p0396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has been a major global event. Countless restrictions and recommendations have revealed novel insights into the everyday lives of people, which are far from uniform across cultures. In this explorative study, the mood perception of people from “individualistic” (Finland) and “collectivistic” (Japan and South Korea) cultures were studied via self-administered questionnaires at the time of major social restrictions (spring–summer of 2020) when the sociocultural effect of the pandemic was at its strongest. A simple measure of “recent mood perception” forms the core of the analysis, against which various factors were analyzed. Such coarse measures fit well with cross-cultural research, for more specific experiences typically do not translate very well between cultures. Somewhat surprisingly, almost no “constant” measures (e.g., occupation, household structure) proved to be significantly correlated with recent mood, whereas the degree of “changes” in personal situation (time spent home, number of people met, and so on, before and after the outbreak) proved to be significant factors, highlighting contextuality and mindset. Further, difference between “individualistic” and “collectivistic” cultures was also observed. These results highlight the vital importance of not only observing consistent phenomena but also recognizing changes and understanding the unique perspectives and experiences individuals have of them. Depending on the context, an objectively same thing can evoke vastly different perceptions.","PeriodicalId":46831,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Disaster Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Disaster Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2024.p0396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has been a major global event. Countless restrictions and recommendations have revealed novel insights into the everyday lives of people, which are far from uniform across cultures. In this explorative study, the mood perception of people from “individualistic” (Finland) and “collectivistic” (Japan and South Korea) cultures were studied via self-administered questionnaires at the time of major social restrictions (spring–summer of 2020) when the sociocultural effect of the pandemic was at its strongest. A simple measure of “recent mood perception” forms the core of the analysis, against which various factors were analyzed. Such coarse measures fit well with cross-cultural research, for more specific experiences typically do not translate very well between cultures. Somewhat surprisingly, almost no “constant” measures (e.g., occupation, household structure) proved to be significantly correlated with recent mood, whereas the degree of “changes” in personal situation (time spent home, number of people met, and so on, before and after the outbreak) proved to be significant factors, highlighting contextuality and mindset. Further, difference between “individualistic” and “collectivistic” cultures was also observed. These results highlight the vital importance of not only observing consistent phenomena but also recognizing changes and understanding the unique perspectives and experiences individuals have of them. Depending on the context, an objectively same thing can evoke vastly different perceptions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行病初期应对期间情绪感知的跨文化比较
新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行是一个全球性的重大事件。无数的限制和建议揭示了人们日常生活的新见解,而这些见解在不同的文化中并不一致。在这项探索性研究中,我们通过自填问卷调查的方式,研究了 "个人主义"(芬兰)和 "集体主义"(日本和韩国)文化背景下的人们在重大社会限制(2020 年春夏)时的情绪感知,当时大流行病的社会文化影响最为强烈。对 "近期情绪感知 "的简单测量构成了分析的核心,并据此分析了各种因素。这种粗略的测量方法非常适合跨文化研究,因为更具体的经验通常不能在不同文化间很好地转换。令人略感意外的是,几乎没有任何 "恒定 "指标(如职业、家庭结构)被证明与最近的情绪显著相关,而个人状况的 "变化 "程度(在家中度过的时间、在疫情爆发前后遇到的人的数量等)则被证明是重要因素,这凸显了情境和心态的重要性。此外,还观察到了 "个人主义 "和 "集体主义 "文化之间的差异。这些结果突出表明,不仅要观察一致的现象,还要认识到变化并理解个人对这些现象的独特观点和体验,这一点至关重要。根据不同的环境,客观上相同的事物会引起截然不同的感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Disaster Research
Journal of Disaster Research GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
37.50%
发文量
113
期刊最新文献
Social Support Is Associated with Fewer Mental Health Problems Among Japanese Nurses During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study Inclusive Disaster Risk Reduction Toward a Society Wherein All People Can Choose How They Live: A Report from a Panel of World BOSAI Forum 2023 Research on the Forecast of Emergency Supplies for Major Public Health Emergencies - An Empirical Study Based on the Distribution of Donated Facial Masks by the Wuhan COVID-19 Epidemic Prevention and Control Headquarters Panel Discussion in WBF 2023: New Collaboration for Building a Resilient Society Transdisciplinary Approach: Toward Innovative Recovery and Disaster Risk Reduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1