Classification of Thoracic X-Ray Images of COVID-19 Patients Using the Convolutional Neutral Network (CNN) Method

Ramacos Fardela, Dian Milvita, Mawanda Almuhayar, Dedi Mardiansyah, Latifah Aulia Rasyada, L. Hakim
{"title":"Classification of Thoracic X-Ray Images of COVID-19 Patients Using the Convolutional Neutral Network (CNN) Method","authors":"Ramacos Fardela, Dian Milvita, Mawanda Almuhayar, Dedi Mardiansyah, Latifah Aulia Rasyada, L. Hakim","doi":"10.3844/jcssp.2024.357.364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Recently, radiology modalities have been widely used to detect COVID-19. Thoracic X-rays and CT scans are the primary radiological tools utilized in the diagnosis and treatment of individuals with COVID-19. In addition, chest CT scans are more accurate and sensitive in early COVID-19 identification. A new problem arises in diagnosing the results of CT scan images of COVID-19 by radiologists or radiology specialists where COVID-19 is difficult to distinguish from pneumonia caused by other viruses and bacteria, so misdiagnosis can occur. Many researchers worldwide have developed computer-aided detection or diagnosis schemes based on medical image processing and machine learning to overcome this challenge. This research focuses on the development of previous studies, where the use of the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) method to classify Thoracic X-ray Images of COVID-19 Patients is compared with the model developed by Roboflow. Image manipulation techniques applied to this study are pseudo color and the program is Python. This study employs the pseudo color image manipulation technique of the program in Python. This study uses data on patients with confirmed COVID-19 at Andalas University Hospital in 2022. Based on the study's results, a very good CNN Specificity score of 93% was obtained and the perfect Sensitivity score value was produced by the detection method using the Roboflow model, which was 100%. However, the Kappa score for both methods is below the expected threshold of 36-38%. Based on the ROC value, the CNN and Roboflow methods are good for calculating chest X-ray images of COVID-19 and normal patients.","PeriodicalId":40005,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2024.357.364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Recently, radiology modalities have been widely used to detect COVID-19. Thoracic X-rays and CT scans are the primary radiological tools utilized in the diagnosis and treatment of individuals with COVID-19. In addition, chest CT scans are more accurate and sensitive in early COVID-19 identification. A new problem arises in diagnosing the results of CT scan images of COVID-19 by radiologists or radiology specialists where COVID-19 is difficult to distinguish from pneumonia caused by other viruses and bacteria, so misdiagnosis can occur. Many researchers worldwide have developed computer-aided detection or diagnosis schemes based on medical image processing and machine learning to overcome this challenge. This research focuses on the development of previous studies, where the use of the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) method to classify Thoracic X-ray Images of COVID-19 Patients is compared with the model developed by Roboflow. Image manipulation techniques applied to this study are pseudo color and the program is Python. This study employs the pseudo color image manipulation technique of the program in Python. This study uses data on patients with confirmed COVID-19 at Andalas University Hospital in 2022. Based on the study's results, a very good CNN Specificity score of 93% was obtained and the perfect Sensitivity score value was produced by the detection method using the Roboflow model, which was 100%. However, the Kappa score for both methods is below the expected threshold of 36-38%. Based on the ROC value, the CNN and Roboflow methods are good for calculating chest X-ray images of COVID-19 and normal patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用卷积中性网络(CNN)方法对 COVID-19 患者的胸部 X 光图像进行分类
:最近,放射学模式被广泛用于检测 COVID-19。胸部 X 光和 CT 扫描是诊断和治疗 COVID-19 患者的主要放射学工具。此外,胸部 CT 扫描在早期识别 COVID-19 方面更为准确和敏感。放射科医生或放射科专家在诊断 COVID-19 的 CT 扫描图像结果时会遇到一个新问题,即 COVID-19 与其他病毒和细菌引起的肺炎很难区分,因此可能会出现误诊。为了克服这一难题,世界上许多研究人员开发了基于医学图像处理和机器学习的计算机辅助检测或诊断方案。本研究的重点是发展以往的研究,将使用卷积神经网络(CNN)方法对 COVID-19 患者的胸部 X 光图像进行分类与 Roboflow 开发的模型进行比较。本研究采用的图像处理技术为伪彩色,程序为 Python。本研究采用了 Python 程序的伪彩色图像处理技术。本研究使用了 2022 年安达卢西亚大学医院确诊的 COVID-19 患者的数据。根据研究结果,获得了非常好的 CNN 特异性得分(93%),使用 Roboflow 模型的检测方法产生了完美的灵敏度得分值(100%)。然而,这两种方法的 Kappa 分数都低于 36%-38% 的预期阈值。根据 ROC 值,CNN 和 Roboflow 方法在计算 COVID-19 和正常患者的胸部 X 光图像方面效果良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Science
Journal of Computer Science Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Journal of Computer Science is aimed to publish research articles on theoretical foundations of information and computation, and of practical techniques for their implementation and application in computer systems. JCS updated twelve times a year and is a peer reviewed journal covers the latest and most compelling research of the time.
期刊最新文献
Features of the Security System Development of a Computer Telecommunication Network Performance Assessment of CPU Scheduling Algorithms: A Scenario-Based Approach with FCFS, RR, and SJF Website-Based Educational Application to Help MSMEs in Indonesia Develop A Multi-Split Cross-Strategy for Enhancing Machine Learning Algorithms Prediction Results with Data Generated by Conditional Generative Adversarial Network Improving the Detection of Mask-Wearing Mistakes by Deep Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1