Digital transformation in Vietnam: the impacts on external auditors and their practices

IF 2.1 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Pacific Accounting Review Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1108/par-04-2023-0051
Phuong Thi Nguyen, Michael Kend, Dung Quang Le
{"title":"Digital transformation in Vietnam: the impacts on external auditors and their practices","authors":"Phuong Thi Nguyen, Michael Kend, Dung Quang Le","doi":"10.1108/par-04-2023-0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to explore some perceptions related to the suggestion that external auditors will be replaced by audit technologies that use artificial intelligence (AI) tools to make audit judgements when performing the financial statement audits. Digital transformation is revitalising the technologies used by external auditors and their firms; thus, the authors seek to understand what challenges this creates for the auditing profession in Vietnam.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThrough the theoretical lens of new institutionalism theory, this study uses a qualitative approach involving 20 semi-structured interviews conducted with external auditors in Vietnam during 2022. This sample includes the global Big Four, global mid-tier and smaller local Vietnamese audit firms.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings indicate that there is resistance or disagreement with the suggestion that in the future audit technologies using AI tools can replace humans (external auditors). The role of external auditors in the professional services sector will gradually be changed by audit technologies; however, external auditors are unlikely to be replaced by audit technologies that use AI tools based on the responses of the participants. Strict institutional rules that exist in Vietnam would prevent the replacement of (human) external auditors. In the future, external auditors may take on new roles as consultants, with unique skills in classifying and processing data for decision-making processes; however, they will not be completely replaced by technology in the audit space.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study has limitations that it is based on the data collection from a single developing country, Vietnam; therefore, the generalisability of the findings is limited to Vietnam. Also, the authors sought insights into the future of external audits in Vietnam.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study highlights the changing role of auditors and institutions. Thus, policymakers, external auditors and auditees in other developing countries would find the findings helpful.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study provides new perspectives, particularly from local Vietnamese firms, about audit practices that emerge due to high-level technological advancements and then embed themselves into existing audit practices in an emerging economy. Prior studies tended to focus on the global Big Four firms, thus this study contributes by sharing the perceptions of the smaller practitioners also.\n","PeriodicalId":46088,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Accounting Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/par-04-2023-0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore some perceptions related to the suggestion that external auditors will be replaced by audit technologies that use artificial intelligence (AI) tools to make audit judgements when performing the financial statement audits. Digital transformation is revitalising the technologies used by external auditors and their firms; thus, the authors seek to understand what challenges this creates for the auditing profession in Vietnam. Design/methodology/approach Through the theoretical lens of new institutionalism theory, this study uses a qualitative approach involving 20 semi-structured interviews conducted with external auditors in Vietnam during 2022. This sample includes the global Big Four, global mid-tier and smaller local Vietnamese audit firms. Findings The findings indicate that there is resistance or disagreement with the suggestion that in the future audit technologies using AI tools can replace humans (external auditors). The role of external auditors in the professional services sector will gradually be changed by audit technologies; however, external auditors are unlikely to be replaced by audit technologies that use AI tools based on the responses of the participants. Strict institutional rules that exist in Vietnam would prevent the replacement of (human) external auditors. In the future, external auditors may take on new roles as consultants, with unique skills in classifying and processing data for decision-making processes; however, they will not be completely replaced by technology in the audit space. Research limitations/implications This study has limitations that it is based on the data collection from a single developing country, Vietnam; therefore, the generalisability of the findings is limited to Vietnam. Also, the authors sought insights into the future of external audits in Vietnam. Practical implications This study highlights the changing role of auditors and institutions. Thus, policymakers, external auditors and auditees in other developing countries would find the findings helpful. Originality/value This study provides new perspectives, particularly from local Vietnamese firms, about audit practices that emerge due to high-level technological advancements and then embed themselves into existing audit practices in an emerging economy. Prior studies tended to focus on the global Big Four firms, thus this study contributes by sharing the perceptions of the smaller practitioners also.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
越南的数字化转型:对外部审计师及其实践的影响
目的本研究旨在探讨与外部审计师将被审计技术取代这一说法有关的一些看法,审计技术在进行财务报表审计时使用人工智能(AI)工具做出审计判断。数字化转型正在重振外部审计师及其公司所使用的技术;因此,作者试图了解这给越南的审计行业带来了哪些挑战。设计/方法/途径通过新制度主义理论的理论视角,本研究采用了一种定性方法,在 2022 年期间对越南的外部审计师进行了 20 次半结构化访谈。研究结果研究结果表明,对于未来使用人工智能工具的审计技术可以取代人类(外部审计师)的说法,存在抵触或异议。外部审计师在专业服务领域的角色将逐渐被审计技术所改变;然而,根据参与者的反应,外部审计师不太可能被使用人工智能工具的审计技术所取代。越南现有的严格制度规则将阻止(人类)外部审计师被取代。未来,外部审计师可能会扮演顾问的新角色,他们在分类和处理决策过程数据方面拥有独特的技能;但是,在审计领域,他们不会被技术完全取代。此外,作者希望深入了解越南外部审计的未来。因此,其他发展中国家的政策制定者、外部审计师和被审计者会发现这些研究结果很有帮助。原创性/价值本研究提供了新的视角,特别是来自越南本地公司的视角,介绍了由于高水平技术进步而出现的审计实践,然后将其嵌入到新兴经济体的现有审计实践中。以往的研究往往侧重于全球四大会计师事务所,因此本研究也分享了较小规模从业人员的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pacific Accounting Review
Pacific Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Pacific Accounting Review is a quarterly journal publishing original research papers and book reviews. The journal is supported by all New Zealand Universities and has the backing of academics from many universities in the Pacific region. The journal publishes papers from both empirical and theoretical forms of research into current developments in accounting and finance and provides insight into how present practice is shaped and formed. Specific areas include but are not limited to: - Emerging Markets and Economies - Political/Social contexts - Financial Reporting - Auditing and Governance - Management Accounting.
期刊最新文献
Auditor mood and audit quality: evidence from music sentiment measure Dissatisfaction with professional accountant training: the role of learning styles CSR disclosure quantity to CSR disclosure quality – in pursuit of a disclosure quality index Social capital and business strategy Corporate tax performance and the COVID-19 pandemic: empirical evidence from Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1