A comparative assessment of OMP and MATLAB for parallel computation

Yajnaseni Dash, Ajith Abraham
{"title":"A comparative assessment of OMP and MATLAB for parallel computation","authors":"Yajnaseni Dash, Ajith Abraham","doi":"10.3233/his-240001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prime goal of parallel computing is the simultaneous parallel execution of several program instructions. Consequently, to accomplish this, the program should be divided into independent sets so that each processor can execute its program part concurrently with the other processors. This study compares OMP and MATLAB, two important parallel computing simulation tools, through the use of a dense matrix multiplication technique. The results showed that OMP outperformed the MATLAB parallel environment by over 8 times in sequential execution and 6 times in parallel execution. From this proposed method, it was also observed that OMP with an even slower processor performs much better than MATLAB with a higher processor. Thus, the present analysis indicates that OMP is a superior environment for parallel computing and should be preferred over parallel MATLAB.","PeriodicalId":88526,"journal":{"name":"International journal of hybrid intelligent systems","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of hybrid intelligent systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/his-240001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prime goal of parallel computing is the simultaneous parallel execution of several program instructions. Consequently, to accomplish this, the program should be divided into independent sets so that each processor can execute its program part concurrently with the other processors. This study compares OMP and MATLAB, two important parallel computing simulation tools, through the use of a dense matrix multiplication technique. The results showed that OMP outperformed the MATLAB parallel environment by over 8 times in sequential execution and 6 times in parallel execution. From this proposed method, it was also observed that OMP with an even slower processor performs much better than MATLAB with a higher processor. Thus, the present analysis indicates that OMP is a superior environment for parallel computing and should be preferred over parallel MATLAB.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OMP 和 MATLAB 在并行计算方面的比较评估
并行计算的首要目标是同时并行执行多个程序指令。因此,为实现这一目标,应将程序划分为独立的程序集,以便每个处理器都能与其他处理器同时执行其程序部分。本研究通过使用密集矩阵乘法技术,比较了 OMP 和 MATLAB 这两种重要的并行计算仿真工具。结果表明,在顺序执行和并行执行中,OMP 的性能分别比 MATLAB 并行环境高出 8 倍和 6 倍以上。从这一提议的方法中还观察到,使用较慢处理器的 OMP 比使用较高处理器的 MATLAB 性能要好得多。因此,目前的分析表明,OMP 是一种优越的并行计算环境,应优先于并行 MATLAB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vision transformer-convolution for breast cancer classification using mammography images: A comparative study Comparative temporal dynamics of individuation and perceptual averaging using a biological neural network model Metaheuristic optimized electrocardiography time-series anomaly classification with recurrent and long-short term neural networks Classifications, evaluation metrics, datasets, and domains in recommendation services: A survey A hybrid approach of machine learning algorithms for improving accuracy of social media crisis detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1