A systematic review on the formative assessment practice in teaching and learning in secondary school

Halimah Abd Halim, Mohd Isa Hamzah, Hafizhah Zulkifli
{"title":"A systematic review on the formative assessment practice in teaching and learning in secondary school","authors":"Halimah Abd Halim, Mohd Isa Hamzah, Hafizhah Zulkifli","doi":"10.11591/ijere.v13i2.26187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Formative assessment is an assessment that is conducted throughout the teaching and learning process. Therefore, teachers should play an important role in mastering the appropriate approaches to practicing formative assessment. According to previous studies, some teachers are unable to comprehend the roles of formative assessment practices in teaching and learning, which prevents them from using them effectively in the classroom. Many researchers have conducted research related to the practice of formative assessment in schools due to this issue. Therefore, this article aims to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) on past studies related to the practice of formative assessment in teaching and learning in secondary schools. This SLR writing process has been referred to as the Preferred Reporting Items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) writing standard. To find related articles and resources in this systematic literature review, two main databases, namely Web of Science and Scopus, were used. A total of 19 articles were extracted from 366 from 2017 to 2021, with exceptions and inclusion criteria considered. Based on the theme analysis, this SLR has three main themes: assessment diversity; assessment strategies, and student learning development. Thus, this study suggests that all compulsory levels of education understand formative assessment conceptually and its implementation comprehensively. This can be disseminated through teacher professional development training programs. It is hoped that such programs will develop teachers who are committed to integrating the concept and practice of assessment for the benefit of students in twenty-first century education.","PeriodicalId":517136,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.26187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Formative assessment is an assessment that is conducted throughout the teaching and learning process. Therefore, teachers should play an important role in mastering the appropriate approaches to practicing formative assessment. According to previous studies, some teachers are unable to comprehend the roles of formative assessment practices in teaching and learning, which prevents them from using them effectively in the classroom. Many researchers have conducted research related to the practice of formative assessment in schools due to this issue. Therefore, this article aims to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) on past studies related to the practice of formative assessment in teaching and learning in secondary schools. This SLR writing process has been referred to as the Preferred Reporting Items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) writing standard. To find related articles and resources in this systematic literature review, two main databases, namely Web of Science and Scopus, were used. A total of 19 articles were extracted from 366 from 2017 to 2021, with exceptions and inclusion criteria considered. Based on the theme analysis, this SLR has three main themes: assessment diversity; assessment strategies, and student learning development. Thus, this study suggests that all compulsory levels of education understand formative assessment conceptually and its implementation comprehensively. This can be disseminated through teacher professional development training programs. It is hoped that such programs will develop teachers who are committed to integrating the concept and practice of assessment for the benefit of students in twenty-first century education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于中学教学中形成性评价实践的系统性综述
形成性评价是贯穿整个教学过程的评价。因此,教师应在掌握适当的形成性评价实践方法方面发挥重要作用。根据以往的研究,一些教师无法理解形成性评价在教与学中的作用,因而无法在课堂上有效地使用形成性评价。基于这个问题,许多研究者对形成性评价在学校的实践进行了相关研究。因此,本文旨在对以往与中学教学中形成性评价实践相关的研究进行系统的文献综述(SLR)。这一系统性文献综述的撰写过程被称为系统性综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)撰写标准。为了在本次系统性文献综述中找到相关文章和资源,我们使用了两个主要数据库,即 Web of Science 和 Scopus。从 2017 年至 2021 年的 366 篇文章中共提取了 19 篇文章,并考虑了例外情况和纳入标准。根据主题分析,本 SLR 有三大主题:评估多样性、评估策略和学生学习发展。因此,本研究建议所有义务教育阶段从概念上理解形成性评价,并全面实施形成性评价。这可以通过教师专业发展培训计划来传播。我们希望这些项目能够培养出致力于将评价的概念与实践相结合的教师,使学生在二十一世纪的教育中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge skills during teaching practicum English as a foreign language lecturers’ language power bases in the high context culture of Toraja Early childhood education pre-service teachers’ perception of outdoor learning A systematic literature review: how do we support students to become numerate? Differentiated instruction in reading in elementary schools: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1