A Refuge from Liberalism?

IF 4.3 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Democracy Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1353/jod.2024.a922843
Patrick J. Deneen
{"title":"A Refuge from Liberalism?","authors":"Patrick J. Deneen","doi":"10.1353/jod.2024.a922843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Bryan Garsten claims that most treatments of liberalism today take the form either of \"autopsy\" or \"demonology,\" and that defenses of liberalism are either \"plaintive or desperate.\" While the former might be true, the latter description misses the mark. In the American case, \"Refuge\" as the basis of a political order is merely the progressive telling not just of what become hidden forms of \"exodus,\" but a particular kind of exodus that has been bound up with liberalism's origin and history. In the current era, the state is seen forcing \"refuges\" such as churches, religious organizations, and other traditional communities to conform to progressivist ideology. Even as the progressive liberal state has insinuated itself into every facet of life, a different kind of exodus has predominated in contemporary U.S. society. That exodus—no longer inspired by a belief in \"refuge\"—takes the form of individual detachment from any community or membership. We are faced now with the prospect of having to live together, a nation of refugees who must cease an exodus into our interior deserts and instead learn the art of making a common home.","PeriodicalId":48227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Democracy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2024.a922843","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Bryan Garsten claims that most treatments of liberalism today take the form either of "autopsy" or "demonology," and that defenses of liberalism are either "plaintive or desperate." While the former might be true, the latter description misses the mark. In the American case, "Refuge" as the basis of a political order is merely the progressive telling not just of what become hidden forms of "exodus," but a particular kind of exodus that has been bound up with liberalism's origin and history. In the current era, the state is seen forcing "refuges" such as churches, religious organizations, and other traditional communities to conform to progressivist ideology. Even as the progressive liberal state has insinuated itself into every facet of life, a different kind of exodus has predominated in contemporary U.S. society. That exodus—no longer inspired by a belief in "refuge"—takes the form of individual detachment from any community or membership. We are faced now with the prospect of having to live together, a nation of refugees who must cease an exodus into our interior deserts and instead learn the art of making a common home.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自由主义的避难所?
摘要:布赖恩-加斯滕称,当今对自由主义的大多数论述要么是 "解剖学",要么是 "魔鬼论",而对自由主义的辩护要么是 "平淡无奇的,要么是绝望的"。前者可能是对的,而后者的描述则失之偏颇。就美国而言,作为政治秩序基础的 "避难所 "不过是一种渐进式的诉说,它不仅是一种隐蔽形式的 "出走",而且是一种与自由主义的起源和历史息息相关的特殊形式的出走。在当今时代,国家被视为迫使教会、宗教组织和其他传统社区等 "避难所 "符合进步主义意识形态。尽管进步自由主义国家已经深入到生活的方方面面,但在当代美国社会中,另一种出走却占据了主导地位。这种出走不再是出于对 "避难所 "的信仰,而是以个人脱离任何社区或成员的形式出现。我们现在面临着必须共同生活的前景,作为一个难民国家,我们必须停止向内陆沙漠的逃亡,转而学习建立共同家园的艺术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Democracy
Journal of Democracy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1990, the Journal of Democracy has become an influential international forum for scholarly analysis and competing democratic viewpoints. Its articles have been cited in The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal and widely reprinted in many languages. Focusing exclusively on democracy, the Journal monitors and analyzes democratic regimes and movements in scores of countries around the world. Each issue features a unique blend of scholarly analysis, reports from democratic activists, updates on news and elections, and reviews of important recent books.
期刊最新文献
Misunderstanding Democratic Backsliding The Bukele Model: Will It Spread? When Democracy Is on the Ballot Pakistan's Coming Crisis Democracy After Truth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1