Surgical Outcomes and Predictive Factors in Patients With Detrusor Underactivity Undergoing Bladder Outlet Obstruction Surgery

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY International Neurourology Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.5213/inj.2346252.126
Ming-Syun Chuang, Yin-Chien Ou, Yu-Sheng Cheng, Kuan-Yu Wu, Chang-Te Wang, Yuan-Chi Huang, Yao-Lin Kao
{"title":"Surgical Outcomes and Predictive Factors in Patients With Detrusor Underactivity Undergoing Bladder Outlet Obstruction Surgery","authors":"Ming-Syun Chuang, Yin-Chien Ou, Yu-Sheng Cheng, Kuan-Yu Wu, Chang-Te Wang, Yuan-Chi Huang, Yao-Lin Kao","doi":"10.5213/inj.2346252.126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of bladder outlet surgery in patients with detrusor underactivity (DU) and to identify factors associated with successful outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of men diagnosed with DU in urodynamic studies who underwent bladder outlet surgery for lower urinary tract symptoms between May 2018 and April 2023. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire, uroflowmetry (UFM), and multichannel urodynamic studies were administered. Successful treatment outcomes were defined as either an IPSS improvement of at least 50% or the regaining of spontaneous voiding in patients urethral catheterization prior to surgery. Results The study included 93 male patients. Men diagnosed with significant or equivocal bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) experienced significant postoperative improvements in IPSS (from 20.6 to 6.0 and from 17.4 to 6.5, respectively), maximum urine flow rate (from 5.0 mL/sec to 14.4 mL/sec and from 8.8 mL/sec to 12.2 mL/sec, respectively) and voiding efficiency (from 48.8% to 86.0% and from 61.2% to 85.1%, respectively). However, in the group without obstruction, the improvements in IPSS and UFM results were not significant. The presence of detrusor overactivity (odds ratio [OR], 3.152; P=0.025) and preoperative urinary catheterization (OR, 2.756; P=0.040) were associated with favorable treatment outcomes. Conversely, an unobstructed bladder outlet was identified as a negative prognostic factor. Conclusions In men with DU accompanied by equivocal or significant BOO, surgical intervention to alleviate the obstruction may enhance the IPSS, quality of life, and UFM results. However, those with DU and an unobstructed bladder outlet face a comparatively high risk of treatment failure. Preoperative detrusor overactivity and urinary catheterization are associated with more favorable surgical outcomes. Consequently, active deobstructive surgery should be considered for patients with DU who are experiencing urinary retention.","PeriodicalId":14466,"journal":{"name":"International Neurourology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Neurourology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.2346252.126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of bladder outlet surgery in patients with detrusor underactivity (DU) and to identify factors associated with successful outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of men diagnosed with DU in urodynamic studies who underwent bladder outlet surgery for lower urinary tract symptoms between May 2018 and April 2023. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire, uroflowmetry (UFM), and multichannel urodynamic studies were administered. Successful treatment outcomes were defined as either an IPSS improvement of at least 50% or the regaining of spontaneous voiding in patients urethral catheterization prior to surgery. Results The study included 93 male patients. Men diagnosed with significant or equivocal bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) experienced significant postoperative improvements in IPSS (from 20.6 to 6.0 and from 17.4 to 6.5, respectively), maximum urine flow rate (from 5.0 mL/sec to 14.4 mL/sec and from 8.8 mL/sec to 12.2 mL/sec, respectively) and voiding efficiency (from 48.8% to 86.0% and from 61.2% to 85.1%, respectively). However, in the group without obstruction, the improvements in IPSS and UFM results were not significant. The presence of detrusor overactivity (odds ratio [OR], 3.152; P=0.025) and preoperative urinary catheterization (OR, 2.756; P=0.040) were associated with favorable treatment outcomes. Conversely, an unobstructed bladder outlet was identified as a negative prognostic factor. Conclusions In men with DU accompanied by equivocal or significant BOO, surgical intervention to alleviate the obstruction may enhance the IPSS, quality of life, and UFM results. However, those with DU and an unobstructed bladder outlet face a comparatively high risk of treatment failure. Preoperative detrusor overactivity and urinary catheterization are associated with more favorable surgical outcomes. Consequently, active deobstructive surgery should be considered for patients with DU who are experiencing urinary retention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受膀胱出口梗阻手术的逼尿肌活动不足患者的手术效果和预测因素
目的 本研究旨在评估膀胱出口手术对逼尿肌活动不足(DU)患者的疗效,并确定与成功结果相关的因素。方法 我们对2018年5月至2023年4月期间在尿动力学研究中被诊断为DU并因下尿路症状接受膀胱出口手术的男性进行了回顾性研究。我们进行了国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)问卷调查、尿流率测定(UFM)和多通道尿动力学研究。成功治疗结果的定义是 IPSS 改善至少 50%,或手术前接受尿道导管检查的患者恢复自主排尿。结果 该研究包括 93 名男性患者。被诊断出患有明显或等效膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)的男性患者在术后IPSS(分别从20.6降至6.0和从17.4降至6.5)、最大尿流率(分别从5.0毫升/秒增至14.4毫升/秒和从8.8毫升/秒增至12.2毫升/秒)和排尿效率(分别从48.8%增至86.0%和从61.2%增至85.1%)均有显著改善。然而,在无梗阻组中,IPSS 和 UFM 结果的改善并不显著。存在逼尿肌过度活动(几率比 [OR],3.152;P=0.025)和术前导尿(OR,2.756;P=0.040)与良好的治疗效果相关。相反,膀胱出口不通畅则是一个负面预后因素。结论 对于患有膀胱尿失禁并伴有等效或明显膀胱尿失禁的男性患者,通过手术治疗缓解梗阻可提高 IPSS、生活质量和 UFM 结果。然而,那些患有膀胱尿道梗阻且膀胱出口未阻塞的患者面临的治疗失败风险相对较高。术前逼尿肌过度活动和导尿与更有利的手术效果相关。因此,对于出现尿潴留的 DU 患者,应考虑进行积极的去梗阻手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Neurourology Journal
International Neurourology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
41
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Neurourology Journal (Int Neurourol J, INJ) is a quarterly international journal that publishes high-quality research papers that provide the most significant and promising achievements in the fields of clinical neurourology and fundamental science. Specifically, fundamental science includes the most influential research papers from all fields of science and technology, revolutionizing what physicians and researchers practicing the art of neurourology worldwide know. Thus, we welcome valuable basic research articles to introduce cutting-edge translational research of fundamental sciences to clinical neurourology. In the editorials, urologists will present their perspectives on these articles. The original mission statement of the INJ was published on October 12, 1997. INJ provides authors a fast review of their work and makes a decision in an average of three to four weeks of receiving submissions. If accepted, articles are posted online in fully citable form. Supplementary issues will be published interim to quarterlies, as necessary, to fully allow berth to accept and publish relevant articles.
期刊最新文献
Public Perceptions of Enuresis: Insights From Online Communities in South Korea and the United States. Serious Games as a Therapeutic Tool in Pediatric Urology: A Review of Current Applications and Future Directions. The Integral Theory, Pelvic Floor Biomechanics, and Binary Innervation. The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form as a Substitute for 1-Hour Pad Weight Testing in the Evaluation of Urinary Incontinence in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Undergoing Surgery. Urodynamic and Frequency-Volume Chart Parameters Influencing Anticholinergic Resistance in Patients With Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1