Muzeum dobra wspólnego i dziwne użytki: Solidarny Dom Kultury „Słonecznik”

Q4 Arts and Humanities Czas Kultury Pub Date : 2024-03-31 DOI:10.61269/mtoq8407
Bogna Stefańska
{"title":"Muzeum dobra wspólnego i dziwne użytki: Solidarny Dom Kultury „Słonecznik”","authors":"Bogna Stefańska","doi":"10.61269/mtoq8407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The “Sunflower” Solidarity Community Center has been operating as part of the Museum of Modern Art in Warsaw since the outbreak of the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. The author treats this activist-artist initiative as a litmus test of the possibilities for activist involvement in Polish cultural institutions. Referring to examples of similar activities from recent years and theoretical studies, she analyzes it in terms of questions about activism in the “safe” environment of a public institution, the stability and possibility of long-term sustainment of such cooperation, and the tensions associated with the institutionalization of the activist impulse. The author uses collected interviews with members of the “Sunflower” SCC collective and people working at the Museum of Modern Art in Warsaw, as well as participant observation, to answer questions, such as whether art institutions are able to support activist initiatives without taking away their potential and preying on the efforts of activist individuals; whether they can be a place for what Sara Ahmed describes as “queer uses ,” and what shape “solidarity museology” or a “museum of the common good” can take. Key-words: “Sunflower,” Ukraine, museum of the common good, solidarity museology, queer uses","PeriodicalId":36912,"journal":{"name":"Czas Kultury","volume":"31 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Czas Kultury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61269/mtoq8407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The “Sunflower” Solidarity Community Center has been operating as part of the Museum of Modern Art in Warsaw since the outbreak of the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. The author treats this activist-artist initiative as a litmus test of the possibilities for activist involvement in Polish cultural institutions. Referring to examples of similar activities from recent years and theoretical studies, she analyzes it in terms of questions about activism in the “safe” environment of a public institution, the stability and possibility of long-term sustainment of such cooperation, and the tensions associated with the institutionalization of the activist impulse. The author uses collected interviews with members of the “Sunflower” SCC collective and people working at the Museum of Modern Art in Warsaw, as well as participant observation, to answer questions, such as whether art institutions are able to support activist initiatives without taking away their potential and preying on the efforts of activist individuals; whether they can be a place for what Sara Ahmed describes as “queer uses ,” and what shape “solidarity museology” or a “museum of the common good” can take. Key-words: “Sunflower,” Ukraine, museum of the common good, solidarity museology, queer uses
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同利益和奇特用途博物馆:"向日葵 "团结文化中心
自 2022 年 2 月俄罗斯全面入侵乌克兰以来,"向日葵 "团结社区中心一直作为华沙现代艺术博物馆的一部分运作。作者将这一活动家-艺术家倡议视为检验活动家参与波兰文化机构可能性的试金石。她参考了近年来类似活动的实例和理论研究,从公共机构 "安全 "环境中的激进主义、这种合作的稳定性和长期持续的可能性以及与激进主义冲动制度化相关的紧张关系等方面对其进行了分析。作者通过对 "向日葵 "SCC 小组成员和华沙现代艺术博物馆工作人员的采访,以及参与式观察,回答了一些问题,如艺术机构是否能够支持激进主义行动,而不削弱其潜力和掠夺激进主义个人的努力;艺术机构是否可以成为萨拉-艾哈迈德(Sara Ahmed)所描述的 "同性恋用途 "的场所;"团结博物馆学 "或 "公益博物馆 "可以采取何种形式。关键词"向日葵"、乌克兰、公益博物馆、团结博物馆学、同性恋用途
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Czas Kultury
Czas Kultury Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Aktywizm dający przyjemność: działanie na zasadzie wspólnej zgody, lokalne zakorzenienie i oddolne polityki integracyjne Ekopareneza. Rozpoznania wstępne Paradoks Kasztanki. Fantazmatyczne eksponaty w domach-muzeach Luzowanie ontologii. O wytwarzaniu więcej-niż-ludzkich lokalności na Górnym Śląsku Przez negantropologię do obywatelskiej rewolucji w lokalnościach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1