Penerapan BEPS Action Plan 4 sebagai Penangkal Penghindaran Pajak melalui Pembebanan Biaya Pinjaman

Owner Pub Date : 2024-03-31 DOI:10.33395/owner.v8i2.2043
Havidz Ibrahim, D. Sari
{"title":"Penerapan BEPS Action Plan 4 sebagai Penangkal Penghindaran Pajak melalui Pembebanan Biaya Pinjaman","authors":"Havidz Ibrahim, D. Sari","doi":"10.33395/owner.v8i2.2043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2015, the government has enacted an interest limitation rule to prevent excessive interest deduction and tax avoidance. However, this regulation is not aligned with the BEPS Action Plan 4 released by the OECD. Previous research had been conducted quantitatively to measure the effectiveness of the current interest limitation rule in Indonesia. However, the result still inconclusive. Some research concluded that the current interest limitation rule is effectively impacted the tax avoidance, while other research concluded otherwise. Furthermore, previous research suggested the importance of future research concerning the BEPS Action Plan 4 implementation in Indonesia. In order to fill the gap, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the current regulation in Indonesia and provide ideal recommendations for implementing the BEPS Action Plan 4 to prevent tax avoidance. The research uses qualitative methods, including case studies and data acquisition techniques like interviews and document analysis. The study found that the current interest limitation rule in Indonesia is not effective in preventing tax avoidance. The OECD's BEPS Action Plan 4 recommendations are considered more effective as an anti-tax avoidance model. The ideal approach for implementation in Indonesia is the mandatory fixed ratio rule method based on EBITDA, with a de minimis threshold. The recommended ratio aligns with the OECD's recommendations, but should be periodically updated according to economic conditions. This approach should apply to both single entities and taxpayers who are group members.","PeriodicalId":124624,"journal":{"name":"Owner","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Owner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v8i2.2043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2015, the government has enacted an interest limitation rule to prevent excessive interest deduction and tax avoidance. However, this regulation is not aligned with the BEPS Action Plan 4 released by the OECD. Previous research had been conducted quantitatively to measure the effectiveness of the current interest limitation rule in Indonesia. However, the result still inconclusive. Some research concluded that the current interest limitation rule is effectively impacted the tax avoidance, while other research concluded otherwise. Furthermore, previous research suggested the importance of future research concerning the BEPS Action Plan 4 implementation in Indonesia. In order to fill the gap, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the current regulation in Indonesia and provide ideal recommendations for implementing the BEPS Action Plan 4 to prevent tax avoidance. The research uses qualitative methods, including case studies and data acquisition techniques like interviews and document analysis. The study found that the current interest limitation rule in Indonesia is not effective in preventing tax avoidance. The OECD's BEPS Action Plan 4 recommendations are considered more effective as an anti-tax avoidance model. The ideal approach for implementation in Indonesia is the mandatory fixed ratio rule method based on EBITDA, with a de minimis threshold. The recommended ratio aligns with the OECD's recommendations, but should be periodically updated according to economic conditions. This approach should apply to both single entities and taxpayers who are group members.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施 BEPS 行动计划 4 作为通过贷款冲销避税的解毒剂
自 2015 年起,政府颁布了利息限制规则,以防止过度扣除利息和避税。然而,该法规与经合组织发布的 BEPS 行动计划 4 并不一致。以前曾进行过量化研究,以衡量印尼现行利息限制规则的有效性。然而,结果仍无定论。一些研究认为现行利息限制规则有效地影响了避税行为,而另一些研究则得出了相反的结论。此外,以往的研究表明,未来有关 BEPS 行动计划 4 在印尼实施情况的研究十分重要。为了填补这一空白,本研究旨在评估印尼现行法规的有效性,并为实施 BEPS 行动计划 4 以防止避税提供理想建议。研究采用定性方法,包括案例研究以及访谈和文件分析等数据采集技术。研究发现,印尼现行的利息限制规则不能有效防止避税。经合组织的 BEPS 行动计划 4 建议被认为是更有效的反避税模式。在印尼实施的理想方法是以息税折旧摊销前利润为基础的强制性固定比率规则方法,并设定最低门槛。建议的比率与经合组织的建议一致,但应根据经济状况定期更新。这种方法既适用于单一实体,也适用于作为集团成员的纳税人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Dapat Mempengaruhi Tax Avoidance Dengan Kepemilikan Institusional Sebagai Variabel Moderasi Optimalisasi Tarif Layanan dengan Memperbaiki dan Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan di Loka Litbangkes Pangandaran Pengaruh Persepsi Pelaku Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah Tentang Penyusunan Laporan Keuangan UMKM Berdasarkan SAK – EMKM Terhadap Penggunaan Informasi akuntansi perpajakan (Studi Kasus Pelaku UMKM di Desa Perkebunan Ramunia) Pengaruh Insentif, Digitalisasi Dan Relawan Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Dengan Kualitas Pelayanan Sebagai Variabel Moderasi Faktor Determinan Kualitas Laba dengan Profitabilitas sebagai Variabel Moderasi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1