Combined Serum Albumin and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Predict All-Cause Death in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-03-31 DOI:10.1155/2024/9969628
Hua Zhang, Shaodong Qiu, Fei Chen, Xiaojun Wang
{"title":"Combined Serum Albumin and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Predict All-Cause Death in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease","authors":"Hua Zhang, Shaodong Qiu, Fei Chen, Xiaojun Wang","doi":"10.1155/2024/9969628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To explore the feasibility of serum albumin (Alb) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in predicting all-cause death (ACD) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD). Methods. Patients with SCAD were divided into 4 groups according to their Alb and LVEF levels: Group A: Alb ≤4 g/dL and LVEF > 50%; Group B: Alb ≤4 g/dL and LVEF ≤50%; Group C: Alb >4 g/dL and LVEF ≤50%; Group D: Alb >4 g/dL and LVEF >50%. The K–M curve and log-rank test were used to compare ACD among the four groups over three years. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the efficacy of predicting ACD among the combination of Alb and LVEF and either Alb or LVEF alone. Cox regression analysis identified the influencing factors of ACD in patients with SCAD and detected the correlation between Alb and LVEF. Results. ACD occurred in 18 (8.9%) of 203 patients with SCAD, with an average follow-up of 26.53 ± 14.34 months. In the Kaplan‒Meier analysis, the risk of ACD in the four groups ranged from high to low: Group B (17.6%) > Group A (26.7%) > Group D (0.9%) > Group C (0%, P<0.001). The ROC curve showed that the combination of Alb and LVEF (AUC = 0.888) had better predictive value for ACD than either Alb (AUC = 0.879) or LVEF alone (AUC = 0.651), P<0.001. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that Alb ≤4 g/dL predicted ACD events after adjusting for baseline (HR: 12.16, 95% CI: 1.57 to 94.41; P=0.017) and treatment (HR: 19.36, 95% CI: 2.53–147.78, P=0.004). Alb was positively correlated with LVEF (r = 0.22, P=0.002). Conclusions. Alb combined with LVEF is more effective than a single index in predicting ACD in SCAD and could be used as a new model to judge the prognosis of SCAD.","PeriodicalId":9494,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9969628","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. To explore the feasibility of serum albumin (Alb) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in predicting all-cause death (ACD) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD). Methods. Patients with SCAD were divided into 4 groups according to their Alb and LVEF levels: Group A: Alb ≤4 g/dL and LVEF > 50%; Group B: Alb ≤4 g/dL and LVEF ≤50%; Group C: Alb >4 g/dL and LVEF ≤50%; Group D: Alb >4 g/dL and LVEF >50%. The K–M curve and log-rank test were used to compare ACD among the four groups over three years. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the efficacy of predicting ACD among the combination of Alb and LVEF and either Alb or LVEF alone. Cox regression analysis identified the influencing factors of ACD in patients with SCAD and detected the correlation between Alb and LVEF. Results. ACD occurred in 18 (8.9%) of 203 patients with SCAD, with an average follow-up of 26.53 ± 14.34 months. In the Kaplan‒Meier analysis, the risk of ACD in the four groups ranged from high to low: Group B (17.6%) > Group A (26.7%) > Group D (0.9%) > Group C (0%, P<0.001). The ROC curve showed that the combination of Alb and LVEF (AUC = 0.888) had better predictive value for ACD than either Alb (AUC = 0.879) or LVEF alone (AUC = 0.651), P<0.001. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that Alb ≤4 g/dL predicted ACD events after adjusting for baseline (HR: 12.16, 95% CI: 1.57 to 94.41; P=0.017) and treatment (HR: 19.36, 95% CI: 2.53–147.78, P=0.004). Alb was positively correlated with LVEF (r = 0.22, P=0.002). Conclusions. Alb combined with LVEF is more effective than a single index in predicting ACD in SCAD and could be used as a new model to judge the prognosis of SCAD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合并血清白蛋白和左心室射血分数可预测稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的全因死亡
目的探讨血清白蛋白(Alb)和左心室射血分数(LVEF)预测稳定型冠状动脉疾病(SCAD)患者全因死亡(ACD)的可行性。研究方法根据 Alb 和 LVEF 水平将 SCAD 患者分为 4 组:A组A组:Alb≤4 g/dL,LVEF>50%;B组:Alb≤4 g/dL,LVEF≤50%;C组:Alb>4 g/dL,LVEF≤50%:白蛋白 >4 g/dL 和 LVEF ≤50%;D 组:白蛋白 >4 g/dL 和 LVEF ≤50%:Alb >4 g/dL 和 LVEF >50%。K-M 曲线和对数秩检验用于比较四组患者三年内的 ACD。接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)用于比较结合 Alb 和 LVEF 与单独 Alb 或 LVEF 预测 ACD 的有效性。Cox 回归分析确定了 SCAD 患者 ACD 的影响因素,并检测了 Alb 与 LVEF 之间的相关性。结果。在203例SCAD患者中,有18例(8.9%)发生了ACD,平均随访时间为(26.53 ± 14.34)个月。在 Kaplan-Meier 分析中,四组患者发生 ACD 的风险从高到低不等:B组(17.6%)>A组(26.7%)>D组(0.9%)>C组(0%,P<0.001)。ROC 曲线显示,Alb 和 LVEF 的组合(AUC = 0.888)比 Alb(AUC = 0.879)或单独 LVEF(AUC = 0.651)对 ACD 有更好的预测价值,P<0.001。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,在调整基线(HR:12.16,95% CI:1.57-94.41;P=0.017)和治疗(HR:19.36,95% CI:2.53-147.78,P=0.004)后,Alb ≤4 g/dL 可预测 ACD 事件。Alb 与 LVEF 呈正相关(r = 0.22,P=0.002)。结论在预测SCAD的ACD方面,Alb结合LVEF比单一指标更有效,可作为判断SCAD预后的新模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology Research and Practice
Cardiology Research and Practice Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies that focus on the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The journal welcomes submissions related to systemic hypertension, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Cycloergometer on Cardiopulmonary Function in Elderly Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Clinical Trial. Inhibiting H2AX Can Ameliorate Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by Regulating P53/JNK Signaling Pathway. Atrial Strain and Strain Rate in a General Population: Do These Measures Improve the Assessment of Elevated NT-proBNP Levels? The Pharmacological Mechanisms Underlying the Protective Effect of Ginsenoside Rg3 against Heart Failure. Beta-Thalassemia Major and Myocardial Iron Overload: A Longitudinal Study with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1