Combined Serum Albumin and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Predict All-Cause Death in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-03-31 DOI:10.1155/2024/9969628
Hua Zhang, Shaodong Qiu, Fei Chen, Xiaojun Wang
{"title":"Combined Serum Albumin and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Predict All-Cause Death in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease","authors":"Hua Zhang, Shaodong Qiu, Fei Chen, Xiaojun Wang","doi":"10.1155/2024/9969628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To explore the feasibility of serum albumin (Alb) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in predicting all-cause death (ACD) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD). Methods. Patients with SCAD were divided into 4 groups according to their Alb and LVEF levels: Group A: Alb ≤4 g/dL and LVEF > 50%; Group B: Alb ≤4 g/dL and LVEF ≤50%; Group C: Alb >4 g/dL and LVEF ≤50%; Group D: Alb >4 g/dL and LVEF >50%. The K–M curve and log-rank test were used to compare ACD among the four groups over three years. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the efficacy of predicting ACD among the combination of Alb and LVEF and either Alb or LVEF alone. Cox regression analysis identified the influencing factors of ACD in patients with SCAD and detected the correlation between Alb and LVEF. Results. ACD occurred in 18 (8.9%) of 203 patients with SCAD, with an average follow-up of 26.53 ± 14.34 months. In the Kaplan‒Meier analysis, the risk of ACD in the four groups ranged from high to low: Group B (17.6%) > Group A (26.7%) > Group D (0.9%) > Group C (0%, P<0.001). The ROC curve showed that the combination of Alb and LVEF (AUC = 0.888) had better predictive value for ACD than either Alb (AUC = 0.879) or LVEF alone (AUC = 0.651), P<0.001. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that Alb ≤4 g/dL predicted ACD events after adjusting for baseline (HR: 12.16, 95% CI: 1.57 to 94.41; P=0.017) and treatment (HR: 19.36, 95% CI: 2.53–147.78, P=0.004). Alb was positively correlated with LVEF (r = 0.22, P=0.002). Conclusions. Alb combined with LVEF is more effective than a single index in predicting ACD in SCAD and could be used as a new model to judge the prognosis of SCAD.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"72 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9969628","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. To explore the feasibility of serum albumin (Alb) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in predicting all-cause death (ACD) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD). Methods. Patients with SCAD were divided into 4 groups according to their Alb and LVEF levels: Group A: Alb ≤4 g/dL and LVEF > 50%; Group B: Alb ≤4 g/dL and LVEF ≤50%; Group C: Alb >4 g/dL and LVEF ≤50%; Group D: Alb >4 g/dL and LVEF >50%. The K–M curve and log-rank test were used to compare ACD among the four groups over three years. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the efficacy of predicting ACD among the combination of Alb and LVEF and either Alb or LVEF alone. Cox regression analysis identified the influencing factors of ACD in patients with SCAD and detected the correlation between Alb and LVEF. Results. ACD occurred in 18 (8.9%) of 203 patients with SCAD, with an average follow-up of 26.53 ± 14.34 months. In the Kaplan‒Meier analysis, the risk of ACD in the four groups ranged from high to low: Group B (17.6%) > Group A (26.7%) > Group D (0.9%) > Group C (0%, P<0.001). The ROC curve showed that the combination of Alb and LVEF (AUC = 0.888) had better predictive value for ACD than either Alb (AUC = 0.879) or LVEF alone (AUC = 0.651), P<0.001. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that Alb ≤4 g/dL predicted ACD events after adjusting for baseline (HR: 12.16, 95% CI: 1.57 to 94.41; P=0.017) and treatment (HR: 19.36, 95% CI: 2.53–147.78, P=0.004). Alb was positively correlated with LVEF (r = 0.22, P=0.002). Conclusions. Alb combined with LVEF is more effective than a single index in predicting ACD in SCAD and could be used as a new model to judge the prognosis of SCAD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合并血清白蛋白和左心室射血分数可预测稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的全因死亡
目的探讨血清白蛋白(Alb)和左心室射血分数(LVEF)预测稳定型冠状动脉疾病(SCAD)患者全因死亡(ACD)的可行性。研究方法根据 Alb 和 LVEF 水平将 SCAD 患者分为 4 组:A组A组:Alb≤4 g/dL,LVEF>50%;B组:Alb≤4 g/dL,LVEF≤50%;C组:Alb>4 g/dL,LVEF≤50%:白蛋白 >4 g/dL 和 LVEF ≤50%;D 组:白蛋白 >4 g/dL 和 LVEF ≤50%:Alb >4 g/dL 和 LVEF >50%。K-M 曲线和对数秩检验用于比较四组患者三年内的 ACD。接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)用于比较结合 Alb 和 LVEF 与单独 Alb 或 LVEF 预测 ACD 的有效性。Cox 回归分析确定了 SCAD 患者 ACD 的影响因素,并检测了 Alb 与 LVEF 之间的相关性。结果。在203例SCAD患者中,有18例(8.9%)发生了ACD,平均随访时间为(26.53 ± 14.34)个月。在 Kaplan-Meier 分析中,四组患者发生 ACD 的风险从高到低不等:B组(17.6%)>A组(26.7%)>D组(0.9%)>C组(0%,P<0.001)。ROC 曲线显示,Alb 和 LVEF 的组合(AUC = 0.888)比 Alb(AUC = 0.879)或单独 LVEF(AUC = 0.651)对 ACD 有更好的预测价值,P<0.001。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,在调整基线(HR:12.16,95% CI:1.57-94.41;P=0.017)和治疗(HR:19.36,95% CI:2.53-147.78,P=0.004)后,Alb ≤4 g/dL 可预测 ACD 事件。Alb 与 LVEF 呈正相关(r = 0.22,P=0.002)。结论在预测SCAD的ACD方面,Alb结合LVEF比单一指标更有效,可作为判断SCAD预后的新模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Do All Isolated Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhages Need to Be Transferred to a Level 1 Trauma Center?" Proton-Coupled Electron and Energy Transfer in Molecular Triads. Chromenylium and Flavylium Polymethine Fluorophores Light Up the Shortwave Infrared Region Construction and Application of Nucleic Acids-Based Biomolecular Condensates Chemical Editing of Proteins: From a Specific Residue to Functional Domains.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1