Modified elastic intramedullary nail internal fixation for distal tibial metaphyseal junction fracture

Wanlin Liu, Zhenqun Zhao, R. Bai, C. Meng
{"title":"Modified elastic intramedullary nail internal fixation for distal tibial metaphyseal junction fracture","authors":"Wanlin Liu, Zhenqun Zhao, R. Bai, C. Meng","doi":"10.1177/18632521241242251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To investigate the application of modified elastic intramedullary nail and the outcomes between modified elastic stable intramedullary nailing and traditional elastic stable intramedullary nailing in children with distal tibial metaphyseal junction fracture. A retrospective study was conducted. From January 2018 to January 2021, a total of 36 children with distal tibial metaphyseal junction fracture were treated in our hospital. All of them were treated with closed reduction and elastic stable intramedullary nailing internal fixation. A total of 18 children were treated by modified elastic stable intramedullary nailing and 18 children were treated by traditional elastic stable intramedullary nailing. Postoperative imaging, clinical efficacy, and complications were analyzed. The mean follow-up time was 20 (15–36) months in modified group and 22 (16–33) months in traditional group. There were no complications such as infection, loss of reduction, and unequal length of lower limbs in modified group while loss of reduction occurred in two cases in traditional group. In these two cases of loss of reduction, we preformed manual reduction and replacement of long leg casts, and there was no loss of reduction, and the patient achieved a good prognosis. In the last follow-up, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score was used. In modified group, excellent outcome achieved in 17 cases, good outcome achieved in 1 case, and satisfactory therapeutic effect was achieved. In traditional elastic stable intramedullary nailing group, excellent outcome achieved in 14 cases, and good outcome achieved in 4 cases. There was no statistical difference in the scores between the two groups. It was concluded that modified elastic stable intramedullary nailing fixation is a safe and effective treatment.","PeriodicalId":138259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics","volume":"24 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521241242251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the application of modified elastic intramedullary nail and the outcomes between modified elastic stable intramedullary nailing and traditional elastic stable intramedullary nailing in children with distal tibial metaphyseal junction fracture. A retrospective study was conducted. From January 2018 to January 2021, a total of 36 children with distal tibial metaphyseal junction fracture were treated in our hospital. All of them were treated with closed reduction and elastic stable intramedullary nailing internal fixation. A total of 18 children were treated by modified elastic stable intramedullary nailing and 18 children were treated by traditional elastic stable intramedullary nailing. Postoperative imaging, clinical efficacy, and complications were analyzed. The mean follow-up time was 20 (15–36) months in modified group and 22 (16–33) months in traditional group. There were no complications such as infection, loss of reduction, and unequal length of lower limbs in modified group while loss of reduction occurred in two cases in traditional group. In these two cases of loss of reduction, we preformed manual reduction and replacement of long leg casts, and there was no loss of reduction, and the patient achieved a good prognosis. In the last follow-up, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score was used. In modified group, excellent outcome achieved in 17 cases, good outcome achieved in 1 case, and satisfactory therapeutic effect was achieved. In traditional elastic stable intramedullary nailing group, excellent outcome achieved in 14 cases, and good outcome achieved in 4 cases. There was no statistical difference in the scores between the two groups. It was concluded that modified elastic stable intramedullary nailing fixation is a safe and effective treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良弹性髓内钉内固定治疗胫骨远端骺端交界处骨折
研究改良弹性髓内钉在胫骨远端骺板交界处骨折患儿中的应用,以及改良弹性稳定髓内钉与传统弹性稳定髓内钉的疗效。本研究为回顾性研究。自2018年1月至2021年1月,我院共收治了36例胫骨远端骺板交界处骨折患儿。所有患儿均采用闭合复位、弹性稳定髓内钉内固定治疗。其中18例采用改良弹性稳定髓内钉治疗,18例采用传统弹性稳定髓内钉治疗。对术后成像、临床疗效和并发症进行了分析。改良组的平均随访时间为20(15-36)个月,传统组为22(16-33)个月。改良组未出现感染、截骨不全和下肢不等长等并发症,而传统组有两例截骨不全。在这两例截骨不全的病例中,我们进行了人工截骨并更换了长腿石膏,截骨不全的情况没有发生,患者预后良好。在最后一次随访中,我们采用了美国骨科足踝协会评分。在改良组中,17 例达到优,1 例达到良,取得了满意的疗效。传统弹性稳定髓内钉组 14 例疗效优,4 例疗效良。两组的评分无统计学差异。结论是改良弹性稳定髓内钉固定是一种安全有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Three-dimensional-printing-guided preoperative planning of upper and lower extremity pediatric orthopedic surgeries: A systematic review of surgical outcomes The perspectives of caregivers and health service providers on barriers to clubfoot management in Puri-Urban health facility in Ghana What’s new in pediatric lower limb reconstruction? Management of osteonecrosis of the humeral head in the pediatric population: A systematic review Temporary hemi-epiphysiodesis with tension band plates in skeletally immature patients with genu valgum: Faster correction in patients with more than 2 years of expected time of growth remaining
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1