“Why the Silence?”: Giving a Voice to the Lived Experiences of STEMM Librarians

Amani Magid, A. Torres
{"title":"“Why the Silence?”: Giving a Voice to the Lived Experiences of STEMM Librarians","authors":"Amani Magid, A. Torres","doi":"10.29173/istl2815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"            Inclusion, diversity, belonging, and equity (IDBE) are tenets discussed and developed in many universities and university libraries. Although there were studies on IDBE in libraries in general, the authors of this study were particularly interested in what Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and Medicine (STEMM) librarians were facing or not facing regarding IDBE. We were unable to locate any known study focusing on STEMM librarians' lived experiences regarding IDBE. Thus, our study aimed to explore this area further. A survey consisting of multiple-choice, Likert and short-answer questions was sent to STEMM librarians via specific listservs. In this study, we use a grounded theory approach and analyze three of the questions in the survey. This study would particularly interest librarians who would like to ascertain the climate of IDBE and the intersection with social justice in STEMM Librarianship. Also, we provide strategies to improve the climate and provide a more inclusive, diverse, equitable and belonging environment for STEMM Librarians. Our data analysis shows that STEMM librarians who identify as People of Color encounter negative behaviors, experiences, and attitudes at a much higher rate than STEMM librarians who are white. In addition, many STEMM librarians who identify as white report white privilege awareness.","PeriodicalId":39287,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship","volume":"56 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

            Inclusion, diversity, belonging, and equity (IDBE) are tenets discussed and developed in many universities and university libraries. Although there were studies on IDBE in libraries in general, the authors of this study were particularly interested in what Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and Medicine (STEMM) librarians were facing or not facing regarding IDBE. We were unable to locate any known study focusing on STEMM librarians' lived experiences regarding IDBE. Thus, our study aimed to explore this area further. A survey consisting of multiple-choice, Likert and short-answer questions was sent to STEMM librarians via specific listservs. In this study, we use a grounded theory approach and analyze three of the questions in the survey. This study would particularly interest librarians who would like to ascertain the climate of IDBE and the intersection with social justice in STEMM Librarianship. Also, we provide strategies to improve the climate and provide a more inclusive, diverse, equitable and belonging environment for STEMM Librarians. Our data analysis shows that STEMM librarians who identify as People of Color encounter negative behaviors, experiences, and attitudes at a much higher rate than STEMM librarians who are white. In addition, many STEMM librarians who identify as white report white privilege awareness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"为什么沉默?为 STEMM 图书馆员的生活经历发声
包容、多样性、归属感和公平(IDBE)是许多大学和大学图书馆讨论和发展的信条。尽管有关于图书馆 IDBE 的一般性研究,但本研究的作者对科学、技术、工程、数学和医学 (STEMM)图书馆员在 IDBE 方面面临或不面临的问题特别感兴趣。我们无法找到任何关于 STEMM 图书馆员在 IDBE 方面的生活经验的已知研究。因此,我们的研究旨在进一步探索这一领域。我们通过特定的邮件列表向 STEMM 图书馆员发送了一份调查问卷,其中包括多项选择题、李克特题和简答题。在本研究中,我们采用了基础理论方法,对调查中的三个问题进行了分析。这项研究尤其会引起那些希望确定 IDBE 的氛围以及 STEMM 图书馆学与社会公正的交叉点的图书馆员的兴趣。此外,我们还提供了改善氛围的策略,为 STEMM 图书馆员提供一个更具包容性、多样性、公平性和归属感的环境。我们的数据分析显示,被认定为有色人种的 STEMM 图书馆员遭遇负面行为、经历和态度的比例远远高于白人 STEMM 图书馆员。此外,许多被认定为白人的 STEMM 图书馆员也报告了白人特权意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship
Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
The Value of Faculty Book Donations: A Case Study of Botany Books at Marx Science and Social Science Library, Yale University Librarian Support in Teaching Open Science Research Practices in Higher Education Addressing Equity and Affordability in Digital Study Tools for STEM and the Health Sciences: Possibilities for Library Involvement A Survey of Student Employment and Geospatial Services in Academic Libraries The Use of Preprints in Doctorate Programs: A Citation Analysis Study of Trends in Chemistry and Physics Dissertations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1