Bank erosion and erosion processes from dendrogeomorphology in southern U.S. prairie streams

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES River Research and Applications Pub Date : 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1002/rra.4274
Joseph D. White, Peter M. Allen, Stephen G. Norair, Samuel T. Barber, John Dunbar, Jungang Gao
{"title":"Bank erosion and erosion processes from dendrogeomorphology in southern U.S. prairie streams","authors":"Joseph D. White, Peter M. Allen, Stephen G. Norair, Samuel T. Barber, John Dunbar, Jungang Gao","doi":"10.1002/rra.4274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Streambank erosion processes influence the amount of soil material contributed to rivers and sedimentation rates in receiving reservoirs. However, the amount of data on bank erosion rates is limited both in range and extent affecting planning for mitigation and watershed management. Dendrogeomorphology is used to determine the date of wood anatomy changes in annual growth increments of roots exposed by erosion of stream banks that when coupled with measurement of the distance of roots to the channel side can be used to calculate the bank retreat rate. Erosion rates derived from dendrogeomorphology are important because these provide erosion data over longer time scales (decades). Here, we use this method to quantify erosion for three different sized watersheds (4 to 3781 km2) located in the water‐scarce southern U.S. prairies that are heavily reliant on surface water and reservoir storage. From 49 roots from the two smaller drainages, erosion ranged from 1.5 to 25.4. For 19 roots collected from the larger subbasin erosion rates were larger ranging from 7.4 to 325.0 cm/years with the larger values and variance associated with two high‐flow events that occurred a year before sampling. We also found differences in straight and meandering portions of the streams where the distance to bank was strongly and positively correlated with the years since root exposure in straight sections. In contrast, meandering bends also showed a positive but low correlation for root exposure date and distance collected. We attribute this difference to erosional processes (i.e., scour and mass wasting) occurring at these channel locations. When compared with other erosion studies across the southern U.S. prairie, our values were similar in magnitude but with low correlation to drainage area indicating site specificity of erosion mechanisms, and watershed landcover influence for different drainages, despite being in the same ecological region.","PeriodicalId":21513,"journal":{"name":"River Research and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"River Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Streambank erosion processes influence the amount of soil material contributed to rivers and sedimentation rates in receiving reservoirs. However, the amount of data on bank erosion rates is limited both in range and extent affecting planning for mitigation and watershed management. Dendrogeomorphology is used to determine the date of wood anatomy changes in annual growth increments of roots exposed by erosion of stream banks that when coupled with measurement of the distance of roots to the channel side can be used to calculate the bank retreat rate. Erosion rates derived from dendrogeomorphology are important because these provide erosion data over longer time scales (decades). Here, we use this method to quantify erosion for three different sized watersheds (4 to 3781 km2) located in the water‐scarce southern U.S. prairies that are heavily reliant on surface water and reservoir storage. From 49 roots from the two smaller drainages, erosion ranged from 1.5 to 25.4. For 19 roots collected from the larger subbasin erosion rates were larger ranging from 7.4 to 325.0 cm/years with the larger values and variance associated with two high‐flow events that occurred a year before sampling. We also found differences in straight and meandering portions of the streams where the distance to bank was strongly and positively correlated with the years since root exposure in straight sections. In contrast, meandering bends also showed a positive but low correlation for root exposure date and distance collected. We attribute this difference to erosional processes (i.e., scour and mass wasting) occurring at these channel locations. When compared with other erosion studies across the southern U.S. prairie, our values were similar in magnitude but with low correlation to drainage area indicating site specificity of erosion mechanisms, and watershed landcover influence for different drainages, despite being in the same ecological region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从树枝地貌学看美国南部草原溪流的河岸侵蚀和侵蚀过程
河岸侵蚀过程会影响流入河流的土壤物质数量和受水水库的沉积速率。然而,有关河岸侵蚀率的数据量在范围和程度上都很有限,影响了减灾规划和流域管理。树枝地貌学可用于确定因河岸侵蚀而暴露出来的根系年生长增量的木材解剖变化日期,再加上根系到河道边距离的测量值,可用于计算河岸退缩率。从树枝地貌学中得出的侵蚀率非常重要,因为它们提供了更长时间尺度(数十年)的侵蚀数据。在这里,我们使用这种方法来量化美国南部缺水大草原上三个不同大小流域(4 至 3781 平方公里)的侵蚀情况,这些流域严重依赖地表水和水库蓄水。从两个较小流域采集的 49 根树根中,侵蚀程度从 1.5 到 25.4 不等。在较大的子流域采集的 19 根树根中,侵蚀率较大,从 7.4 厘米/年到 325.0 厘米/年不等,较大的侵蚀率值和差异与采样前一年发生的两次高流量事件有关。我们还发现了溪流直线段和蜿蜒段的差异,在直线段,到河岸的距离与根系暴露后的年数呈强烈的正相关。相反,蜿蜒弯曲的河段的根系暴露日期与采集距离也呈正相关,但相关性较低。我们将这种差异归因于在这些河道位置发生的侵蚀过程(即冲刷和大量流失)。与美国南部大草原的其他侵蚀研究相比,我们的数值大小相似,但与流域面积的相关性较低,这表明侵蚀机制具有地点特异性,而且尽管处于同一生态区域,流域土地覆盖也会对不同流域产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
River Research and Applications
River Research and Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: River Research and Applications , previously published as Regulated Rivers: Research and Management (1987-2001), is an international journal dedicated to the promotion of basic and applied scientific research on rivers. The journal publishes original scientific and technical papers on biological, ecological, geomorphological, hydrological, engineering and geographical aspects related to rivers in both the developed and developing world. Papers showing how basic studies and new science can be of use in applied problems associated with river management, regulation and restoration are encouraged as is interdisciplinary research concerned directly or indirectly with river management problems.
期刊最新文献
Scenario Planning Management Actions to Restore Cold Water Stream Habitat: Comparing Mechanistic and Statistical Modeling Approaches Environmental Factors Associated With Fish Reproduction in Regulated Rivers Stream Restoration Effects on Habitat and Abundance of Native Cutthroat Trout Simulation‐Based Assessment of Fine Sediment Transport to Support River Restoration Measures Going to the archives: Combining palaeoecological and contemporary data to support river restoration appraisals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1