{"title":"Jacques van Ginneken and Significs","authors":"Els Elffers","doi":"10.1075/hl.00139.elf","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the early 1920s, the Dutch linguist Jacques van Ginneken S. J. (1877–1945) was involved in Significs, an\n idealistic-linguistic movement. He joined the group despite his objections against language reform, which was a central signific\n goal. The curious combination of Van Ginneken’s considerable impact on the movement and the tensions between this Jesuit linguist\n and his co-significians, brilliant intellectuals and social idealists, calls for further analysis. In this article, Van Ginneken’s\n contribution to Significs and his complicated role in the movement will be discussed in some detail. Special attention will be\n paid to the position of Van Ginneken and the leading significians in the contemporary multi-faceted transition from linguistic\n psychologism to linguistic anti-psychologism. Both parties adopted a prominently psychologistic program, which entailed some\n shared focuses of interest. However, they combined this with very diverse anti-psychologistic elements, which widened the gap\n between them.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.00139.elf","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the early 1920s, the Dutch linguist Jacques van Ginneken S. J. (1877–1945) was involved in Significs, an
idealistic-linguistic movement. He joined the group despite his objections against language reform, which was a central signific
goal. The curious combination of Van Ginneken’s considerable impact on the movement and the tensions between this Jesuit linguist
and his co-significians, brilliant intellectuals and social idealists, calls for further analysis. In this article, Van Ginneken’s
contribution to Significs and his complicated role in the movement will be discussed in some detail. Special attention will be
paid to the position of Van Ginneken and the leading significians in the contemporary multi-faceted transition from linguistic
psychologism to linguistic anti-psychologism. Both parties adopted a prominently psychologistic program, which entailed some
shared focuses of interest. However, they combined this with very diverse anti-psychologistic elements, which widened the gap
between them.