Subseasonal forecast skill of evaporative demand, soil moisture, and flash drought onset from two dynamic models over the contiguous United States

Kyle Lesinger, Di Tian, Hailan Wang
{"title":"Subseasonal forecast skill of evaporative demand, soil moisture, and flash drought onset from two dynamic models over the contiguous United States","authors":"Kyle Lesinger, Di Tian, Hailan Wang","doi":"10.1175/jhm-d-23-0124.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nFlash droughts are rapid developing subseasonal climate extreme events that are manifested as suddenly decreased soil moisture, driven by increased evaporative demand and/or sustained precipitation deficits. Over each climate region in the contiguous United States (CONUS), we evaluated forecast skill of weekly root-zone soil moisture (RZSM), evaporative demand (ETo), and relevant flash drought (FD) indices derived from two dynamic models (GEOSV2p1 and GEFSv12) in the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) project between years 2000-2019 against three reference datasets: MERRA-2, NLDAS-2, and GEFSv12 reanalysis. ETo and its forcing variables at lead week 1 have moderate to high anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC) skill (~0.70-0.95) except downwelling shortwave radiation, and by weeks 3-4 predictability was low for all forcing variables (ACC <0.5). RZSM (0-100cm) for model GEFSv12 showed high skill at lead week 1 (~0.7-0.85 ACC) in the High Plains, West, Midwest, and South CONUS regions when evaluated against GEFSv12 reanalysis but lower skill against MERRA-2 and NLDAS-2 and ACC skill are still close to 0.5 for lead weeks 3-4, better than ETo forecasts. GEFSv12 analysis has not been evaluated against in situ observations and has substantial RZSM anomaly differences when compared to NLDAS-2 and our analysis identified GEFSv12 reforecast prediction limit, which can maximally achieve ACC ~0.6 for RZSM forecasts between lead weeks 3-4. Analysis of major FD events reveal that GEFSv12 reforecast inconsistently captured the correct location of atmospheric and RZSM anomalies contributing to FD onset, suggesting the needs for improving the dynamic models’ assimilation and initialization procedures to improve subseasonal FD predictability.","PeriodicalId":503314,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-23-0124.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flash droughts are rapid developing subseasonal climate extreme events that are manifested as suddenly decreased soil moisture, driven by increased evaporative demand and/or sustained precipitation deficits. Over each climate region in the contiguous United States (CONUS), we evaluated forecast skill of weekly root-zone soil moisture (RZSM), evaporative demand (ETo), and relevant flash drought (FD) indices derived from two dynamic models (GEOSV2p1 and GEFSv12) in the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) project between years 2000-2019 against three reference datasets: MERRA-2, NLDAS-2, and GEFSv12 reanalysis. ETo and its forcing variables at lead week 1 have moderate to high anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC) skill (~0.70-0.95) except downwelling shortwave radiation, and by weeks 3-4 predictability was low for all forcing variables (ACC <0.5). RZSM (0-100cm) for model GEFSv12 showed high skill at lead week 1 (~0.7-0.85 ACC) in the High Plains, West, Midwest, and South CONUS regions when evaluated against GEFSv12 reanalysis but lower skill against MERRA-2 and NLDAS-2 and ACC skill are still close to 0.5 for lead weeks 3-4, better than ETo forecasts. GEFSv12 analysis has not been evaluated against in situ observations and has substantial RZSM anomaly differences when compared to NLDAS-2 and our analysis identified GEFSv12 reforecast prediction limit, which can maximally achieve ACC ~0.6 for RZSM forecasts between lead weeks 3-4. Analysis of major FD events reveal that GEFSv12 reforecast inconsistently captured the correct location of atmospheric and RZSM anomalies contributing to FD onset, suggesting the needs for improving the dynamic models’ assimilation and initialization procedures to improve subseasonal FD predictability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两个动态模型对美国毗连地区蒸发需求、土壤水分和山洪暴发干旱的次季节预报技能
闪旱是一种快速发展的亚季节性气候极端事件,表现为土壤水分在蒸发需求增加和/或持续降水不足的驱动下突然减少。在美国毗连地区(CONUS)的每个气候区域,我们评估了 2000-2019 年间根区土壤水分(RZSM)、蒸发需求(ETo)和相关闪旱(FD)指数的预测技能,这些预测技能来自亚季节试验(SubX)项目中的两个动态模式(GEOSV2p1 和 GEFSv12),并与三个参考数据集进行了对比:MERRA-2、NLDAS-2 和 GEFSv12 再分析。除下沉短波辐射外,ETo 及其临界变量在第 1 周的异常相关系数(ACC)为中等至高等(~0.70-0.95),而在第 3-4 周,所有临界变量的可预测性都很低(ACC <0.5)。GEFSv12模式的RZSM(0-100厘米)在第1周显示出较高的技能(约0.7-0.85 ACC),与GEFSv12再分析相比,在高平原、西部、中西部和南CONUS地区显示出较高的技能,但与MERRA-2和NLDAS-2相比技能较低,在第3-4周ACC技能仍接近0.5,优于ETo预报。GEFSv12的分析尚未根据实地观测进行评估,与NLDAS-2相比,RZSM异常差异很大,我们的分析确定了GEFSv12再预报的预测极限,在第3-4周的RZSM预报中,它可以最大限度地达到ACC~0.6。对主要FD事件的分析表明,GEFSv12再预报对导致FD发生的大气和RZSM异常的正确位置捕捉不一致,这表明需要改进动力模式的同化和初始化程序,以提高副季性FD的可预报性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding the source and evolution of precipitation stable isotope composition across O‘ahu, Hawai‘i, USA Improving Subseasonal Soil Moisture and Evaporative Stress Index Forecasts through Machine Learning: The Role of Initial Land State versus Dynamical Model Output The Shrinking Great Salt Lake May Exacerbate Droughts by Reducing Local Precipitation: A Case Study In situ observations of rain rate and precipitation microphysics over the coastal area of South China: Perspectives for satellite validation Evaporation driven by Atmospheric Boundary Layer Processes over a Shallow Salt-Water Lagoon in the Altiplano
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1