Payments for environmental services and economic growth: A theoretical model

Q3 Social Sciences Environmental Economics Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.21511/ee.15(1).2024.06
Dickens Liwono Moba, N. Piluso
{"title":"Payments for environmental services and economic growth: A theoretical model","authors":"Dickens Liwono Moba, N. Piluso","doi":"10.21511/ee.15(1).2024.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the global climate emergency and the complex financing problems facing developing countries, some economists are advocating the introduction of payments for environmental services. The question is whether payments for environmental services will enable developing countries to make the ecological transition compatible with the economic growth they need to develop. This study presents a theoretical analysis of the economic and ecological efficiency of such a mechanism, and aims to determine whether it has any recessionary or disincentive effects. In other words, it determines whether, from a theoretical point of view, the environmental services provided by developing countries are compatible with continued growth. The study introduces a “payments for environmental services” procedure into a general equilibrium model (with involuntary unemployment) composed of multinational firms in developed and developing economies. This theoretical model yields the following results. Firstly, higher ecological taxes can directly increase environmental services without any recessionary effect. The system of payments for environmental services means that green investment is not necessarily incompatible with growth and development in developing countries. On the other hand, services in return for environmental payments can lead to a rebound effect from polluting activities, which is why such programs need to be accompanied by more radical environmental policies. In conclusion, while payments for environmental services can promote both ecological transition and growth in developing countries, it is necessary to control the rebound effect arising from the development of economic activity.","PeriodicalId":52974,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Economics","volume":"121 49","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.15(1).2024.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the global climate emergency and the complex financing problems facing developing countries, some economists are advocating the introduction of payments for environmental services. The question is whether payments for environmental services will enable developing countries to make the ecological transition compatible with the economic growth they need to develop. This study presents a theoretical analysis of the economic and ecological efficiency of such a mechanism, and aims to determine whether it has any recessionary or disincentive effects. In other words, it determines whether, from a theoretical point of view, the environmental services provided by developing countries are compatible with continued growth. The study introduces a “payments for environmental services” procedure into a general equilibrium model (with involuntary unemployment) composed of multinational firms in developed and developing economies. This theoretical model yields the following results. Firstly, higher ecological taxes can directly increase environmental services without any recessionary effect. The system of payments for environmental services means that green investment is not necessarily incompatible with growth and development in developing countries. On the other hand, services in return for environmental payments can lead to a rebound effect from polluting activities, which is why such programs need to be accompanied by more radical environmental policies. In conclusion, while payments for environmental services can promote both ecological transition and growth in developing countries, it is necessary to control the rebound effect arising from the development of economic activity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境服务付费与经济增长:一个理论模型
鉴于全球气候紧急状况和发展中国家面临的复杂融资问题,一些经济学家主张引入环境服务付费。问题是,为环境服务付费是否能使发展中国家在实现生态转型的同时,实现其发展所需的经济增长。本研究对这种机制的经济和生态效率进行了理论分析,旨在确定这种机制是否会产生衰退或抑制作用。换句话说,它从理论角度确定了发展中国家提供的环境服务是否与持续增长相匹配。研究将 "环境服务付费 "程序引入了一个由发达经济体和发展中经济体的跨国公司组成的一般均衡模型(有非自愿失业)。该理论模型得出以下结果。首先,提高生态税可以直接增加环境服务,而不会产生任何衰退效应。环境服务付费制度意味着绿色投资不一定与发展中国家的增长和发展相抵触。另一方面,以服务换取环境付款可能会导致污染活动的反弹效应,这就是为什么此类计划需要辅以更激进的环境政策。总之,虽然环境服务付费可以促进发展中国家的生态转型和增长,但有必要控制经济活动发展带来的反弹效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Economics
Environmental Economics Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Decarbonization in the maritime industry: Factors to create an efficient transition strategy Governmental approaches to food security management: A bibliometric analysis Implementation of eco-control system by Indonesian manufacturing firms: Understanding the mediating role of organizational culture Is corporate social responsibility effective in improving environmental quality? Literature review Evaluating the efficiency of public expenditure in municipal waste collection: A comparative study of Portuguese municipalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1