A systematic review of business models in healthcare: research directions for emerging and developed economies

Sunil Kumar Yadav, Shiwangi Singh, S. K. Prusty
{"title":"A systematic review of business models in healthcare: research directions for emerging and developed economies","authors":"Sunil Kumar Yadav, Shiwangi Singh, S. K. Prusty","doi":"10.1108/bij-07-2023-0473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeBusiness models (BMs) are becoming increasingly crucial for value creation in the healthcare sector. The study explores the conceptualization and application of BM concepts within the healthcare sector and investigates their evolution in emerging economies (EEs) and developed economies (DEs). This study aims to uncover these two contexts' shared characteristics and unique variances through a comparative analysis.Design/methodology/approachThe paper systematically investigates and consolidates the literature on healthcare by employing the antecedents, decisions and outcomes (ADO) framework and finally examines 71 shortlisted articles published between 2003 and 2022.FindingsThe recognition of the BM within healthcare is increasing, both in EEs and DEs. EEs prioritize value creation and capture through cost efficiency, while DEs focus on innovation. Key theories employed include a resource-based view, the network theory and the theory of innovation. Case studies are commonly used as a methodology. Further research is needed to explore the decisions and outcomes of BMs.Research limitations/implicationsThe study adopts stringent filtration and keyword criteria, potentially excluding relevant research. Future researchers are encouraged to broaden their selection criteria to encompass a more extensive range of relevant studies.Practical implicationsBeyond comparing and highlighting gaps in BMs between EEs and DEs, benchmarking DE's healthcare business models (HBMs) helps healthcare organizations in EEs align their practices, mitigate risks and establish efficient healthcare systems tailored to their specific contexts. The study adopts stringent filtration and keyword criteria, potentially excluding relevant research. Future researchers are encouraged to broaden their selection criteria to encompass a more extensive range of relevant studies.Originality/valueThe study analyzes HBMs using an SLR framework perspective and provides practical implications for academicians and practitioners to enhance their decision-making.","PeriodicalId":502853,"journal":{"name":"Benchmarking: An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benchmarking: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-07-2023-0473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeBusiness models (BMs) are becoming increasingly crucial for value creation in the healthcare sector. The study explores the conceptualization and application of BM concepts within the healthcare sector and investigates their evolution in emerging economies (EEs) and developed economies (DEs). This study aims to uncover these two contexts' shared characteristics and unique variances through a comparative analysis.Design/methodology/approachThe paper systematically investigates and consolidates the literature on healthcare by employing the antecedents, decisions and outcomes (ADO) framework and finally examines 71 shortlisted articles published between 2003 and 2022.FindingsThe recognition of the BM within healthcare is increasing, both in EEs and DEs. EEs prioritize value creation and capture through cost efficiency, while DEs focus on innovation. Key theories employed include a resource-based view, the network theory and the theory of innovation. Case studies are commonly used as a methodology. Further research is needed to explore the decisions and outcomes of BMs.Research limitations/implicationsThe study adopts stringent filtration and keyword criteria, potentially excluding relevant research. Future researchers are encouraged to broaden their selection criteria to encompass a more extensive range of relevant studies.Practical implicationsBeyond comparing and highlighting gaps in BMs between EEs and DEs, benchmarking DE's healthcare business models (HBMs) helps healthcare organizations in EEs align their practices, mitigate risks and establish efficient healthcare systems tailored to their specific contexts. The study adopts stringent filtration and keyword criteria, potentially excluding relevant research. Future researchers are encouraged to broaden their selection criteria to encompass a more extensive range of relevant studies.Originality/valueThe study analyzes HBMs using an SLR framework perspective and provides practical implications for academicians and practitioners to enhance their decision-making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健领域商业模式的系统回顾:新兴经济体和发达经济体的研究方向
目的 商业模式(BM)对于医疗保健行业的价值创造越来越重要。本研究探讨了商业模式概念在医疗保健行业中的概念化和应用,并调查了它们在新兴经济体(EEs)和发达经济体(DEs)中的演变。本文采用前因、决策和结果(ADO)框架,对医疗保健领域的文献进行了系统的研究和整合,最后对 2003 年至 2022 年间发表的 71 篇入围文章进行了研究。EE 优先考虑通过成本效率创造和获取价值,而 DE 则侧重于创新。采用的主要理论包括基于资源的观点、网络理论和创新理论。案例研究通常被用作一种方法。研究局限/影响本研究采用了严格的过滤和关键词标准,可能会排除相关研究。鼓励未来的研究人员拓宽选择标准,以涵盖更广泛的相关研究。实际意义除了比较和强调欧洲经济体与发展中经济体之间在业务管理方面的差距外,基准化发展中经济体的医疗保健业务模式(HBMs)还有助于欧洲经济体的医疗保健组织调整其做法、降低风险并建立适合其具体情况的高效医疗保健系统。本研究采用了严格的过滤和关键词标准,可能会排除相关研究。鼓励未来的研究人员拓宽选择标准,以涵盖更广泛的相关研究。原创性/价值本研究从 SLR 框架的角度分析了 HBM,并为学术界和从业人员加强决策提供了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Humanitarian supply chain resilience: does organizational flexibility matter? Impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) on foreign institutional investments in India: a machine learning perspective Analyzing barriers to sustainable healthcare waste disposal: a hybrid decision-making framework Intrinsic satisfaction and turnover intentions: the moderating roles of collegial and managerial values congruence Unraveling the role of digital leadership in developing digital dynamic capabilities for the digital transformation of firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1