Evaluation of soil fertility index in organic, semi-organic, and conventional rice field management systems

IF 1 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Scientia Agropecuaria Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.17268/sci.agropecu.2024.012
S. Suntoro, Ganjar Herdiansyah, Heri Widijanto, S. Minardi, Febridita Sari Dewi
{"title":"Evaluation of soil fertility index in organic, semi-organic, and conventional rice field management systems","authors":"S. Suntoro, Ganjar Herdiansyah, Heri Widijanto, S. Minardi, Febridita Sari Dewi","doi":"10.17268/sci.agropecu.2024.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rice farming in Madiun Regency implements three different management systems, that is organic, semi-organic, and conventional. The different implementation of these rice field management systems impacts soil fertility index and rice productivity. This purpose of this research was to know the effect of rice field management systems on soil fertility index and rice productivity in the Madiun Regency. The research uses an explorative descriptive qualitative method with a survey approach. Soil samples were taken using a random sampling method and 3 types of soil management systems (conventional, semi-organic and organic), and rice production samples were taken using an estimation method. The research results show that the soil fertility index ranges from 0.78 to 0.82, which is high. The highest soil fertility index is in the semi-organic management system and the lowest is in the organic management. The management system of semi-organic gave a response to the highest rice production of 6.89 tons/ha. Management system of semi-organic is a better management for increasing and maintaining soil fertility and crop production than conventional or organic. Farming activities results show that organic management systems increase the highest income, increasing 115.58% and 53.30% in semi-organic compared to conventional. The rice field management system has the effect of increasing the worm population density with the highest in the organic system, namely 4.19 individuals m-2. The Pontoscolex worm type dominates the three management systems. There is a correlation between organic matter content and earthworms.","PeriodicalId":21642,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Agropecuaria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Agropecuaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2024.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rice farming in Madiun Regency implements three different management systems, that is organic, semi-organic, and conventional. The different implementation of these rice field management systems impacts soil fertility index and rice productivity. This purpose of this research was to know the effect of rice field management systems on soil fertility index and rice productivity in the Madiun Regency. The research uses an explorative descriptive qualitative method with a survey approach. Soil samples were taken using a random sampling method and 3 types of soil management systems (conventional, semi-organic and organic), and rice production samples were taken using an estimation method. The research results show that the soil fertility index ranges from 0.78 to 0.82, which is high. The highest soil fertility index is in the semi-organic management system and the lowest is in the organic management. The management system of semi-organic gave a response to the highest rice production of 6.89 tons/ha. Management system of semi-organic is a better management for increasing and maintaining soil fertility and crop production than conventional or organic. Farming activities results show that organic management systems increase the highest income, increasing 115.58% and 53.30% in semi-organic compared to conventional. The rice field management system has the effect of increasing the worm population density with the highest in the organic system, namely 4.19 individuals m-2. The Pontoscolex worm type dominates the three management systems. There is a correlation between organic matter content and earthworms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有机、半有机和常规稻田管理系统的土壤肥力指数评估
马迪恩县的水稻种植采用了三种不同的管理系统,即有机、半有机和常规。这些稻田管理系统的不同实施方式会影响土壤肥力指数和水稻产量。本研究旨在了解马迪恩地区稻田管理系统对土壤肥力指数和水稻生产力的影响。研究采用了探索性描述定性方法和调查方法。土壤样本采用随机抽样法,3 种土壤管理系统(常规、半有机和有机),水稻产量样本采用估算法。研究结果表明,土壤肥力指数在 0.78 至 0.82 之间,属于较高水平。土壤肥力指数最高的是半有机管理系统,最低的是有机管理系统。半有机管理系统的水稻产量最高,达到 6.89 吨/公顷。在提高和保持土壤肥力和作物产量方面,半有机管理系统比常规或有机管理系统更好。农业活动结果表明,有机管理系统的收入增幅最高,与常规相比,半有机增加了 115.58%,有机增加了 53.30%。稻田管理系统具有增加蠕虫种群密度的效果,其中有机系统的蠕虫种群密度最高,为 4.19 个个体 m-2。Pontoscolex 蠕虫类型在三种管理制度中占主导地位。有机质含量与蚯蚓之间存在相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scientia Agropecuaria
Scientia Agropecuaria AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correlations, genetic and phenotypic parameters in quantitative and qualitative traits of Swietenia macrophylla in Ucayali, Peru Un Indicator values for food shelf life prediction: A review Commercial Tara Protein: Functional properties and use to stabilize sacha inchi oil emulsions obtained by ultrasound Influence of high Andean grasslands on landslide reduction in Peru A strategy to optimize soil phosphorus reserve: A study based on native maize of Mexico and genotype selection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1