A study to assess the prevalence and risk factors for Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in a tertiary care hospital in Northern India

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Laboratory Physicians Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.25259/jlp-2023-3-5-(1657)
U. Ghoshal, Romya Singh, Nidhi Tejan, C. Sahu, Ankita Pandey, U. Ghoshal
{"title":"A study to assess the prevalence and risk factors for Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in a tertiary care hospital in Northern India","authors":"U. Ghoshal, Romya Singh, Nidhi Tejan, C. Sahu, Ankita Pandey, U. Ghoshal","doi":"10.25259/jlp-2023-3-5-(1657)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe prevalence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is on rise among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study sought to describe the prevalence and risk factors of CDI in patients with IBD as compared to non-IBD controls.\n\n\n\nThis was a prospective study conducted at a Department of Microbiology in collaboration with a Department of Gastroenterology. The patients with IBD and controls without IBD presenting with diarrhea were included in the study. The screening test for C. difficile infection was done by glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) assay and toxin detection by enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). Anaerobic culture for C. difficile was done on a selective cycloserine cefoxitin fructose agar and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was done for Toxin A (TcdA) and Toxin B (TcdB) gene detection. C. difficile infection was confirmed if GDH and toxin ELISA or PCR were positive.\n\n\n\nData were analyzed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20.0.The numerical variables were presented by means and standard deviations. Comparison of continuous variables was done using Student’s t-test. Categorical variables were analyzed by Chi square test. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.\n\n\n\nA total of 160 cases and 112 age- and gender-matched control were included in IBD group and nonIBD group, respectively. Only one culture was positive, 12 and six were positive for GDH ELISA and TcdA and TcdB ELISA, respectively, and 7 were positive by PCR for toxin genes. The factors found significantly associated with CDI were proton-pump inhibitors use (P = 0.001), levofloxacin (P =0.001), and azathioprine (P =0.042). Using PCR as a reference method for C. difficile toxin detection, the sensitivity, and specificity of GDH ELISA and ELISA for toxins were 100%, 96.8% and 85.7%, and 100%, respectively.\n\n\n\nThe prevalence of CDI among patients with IBD has been found to be low, that is (only 4.4%) in this study population.\n","PeriodicalId":16149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory Physicians","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory Physicians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jlp-2023-3-5-(1657)","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevalence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is on rise among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study sought to describe the prevalence and risk factors of CDI in patients with IBD as compared to non-IBD controls. This was a prospective study conducted at a Department of Microbiology in collaboration with a Department of Gastroenterology. The patients with IBD and controls without IBD presenting with diarrhea were included in the study. The screening test for C. difficile infection was done by glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) assay and toxin detection by enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). Anaerobic culture for C. difficile was done on a selective cycloserine cefoxitin fructose agar and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was done for Toxin A (TcdA) and Toxin B (TcdB) gene detection. C. difficile infection was confirmed if GDH and toxin ELISA or PCR were positive. Data were analyzed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20.0.The numerical variables were presented by means and standard deviations. Comparison of continuous variables was done using Student’s t-test. Categorical variables were analyzed by Chi square test. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. A total of 160 cases and 112 age- and gender-matched control were included in IBD group and nonIBD group, respectively. Only one culture was positive, 12 and six were positive for GDH ELISA and TcdA and TcdB ELISA, respectively, and 7 were positive by PCR for toxin genes. The factors found significantly associated with CDI were proton-pump inhibitors use (P = 0.001), levofloxacin (P =0.001), and azathioprine (P =0.042). Using PCR as a reference method for C. difficile toxin detection, the sensitivity, and specificity of GDH ELISA and ELISA for toxins were 100%, 96.8% and 85.7%, and 100%, respectively. The prevalence of CDI among patients with IBD has been found to be low, that is (only 4.4%) in this study population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项评估印度北部一家三级医院炎症性肠病患者艰难梭菌感染率和风险因素的研究
艰难梭菌感染(CDI)在炎症性肠病(IBD)患者中的发病率呈上升趋势。本研究旨在描述与非 IBD 对照组相比,IBD 患者中 CDI 的流行率和风险因素。研究对象包括IBD患者和腹泻的非IBD对照组。艰难梭菌感染筛查采用谷氨酸脱氢酶(GDH)检测法,毒素检测采用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)。艰难梭菌厌氧培养在选择性环丝氨酸头孢西丁果糖琼脂上进行,聚合酶链反应(PCR)用于检测毒素 A(TcdA)和毒素 B(TcdB)基因。数据采用社会科学统计软件包 20.0 版进行分析。连续变量的比较采用学生 t 检验。分类变量采用卡方检验。IBD 组和非 IBD 组分别有 160 例病例和 112 例年龄与性别匹配的对照组病例。只有1例培养呈阳性,12例和6例分别在GDH ELISA、TcdA和TcdB ELISA检测中呈阳性,7例在PCR毒素基因检测中呈阳性。发现与 CDI 明显相关的因素是使用质子泵抑制剂(P = 0.001)、左氧氟沙星(P = 0.001)和硫唑嘌呤(P = 0.042)。以 PCR 作为艰难梭菌毒素检测的参考方法,GDH 酶联免疫吸附法和酶联免疫吸附法检测毒素的敏感性和特异性分别为 100%、96.8% 和 85.7%,以及 100%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Laboratory Physicians
Journal of Laboratory Physicians MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊最新文献
Experience of rigorous practice of antimicrobial stewardship program and its impact on antibiotic consumption A new era for Journal of Laboratory Physicians Sensitivity and specificity of newly generated monoclonal antibodies to detect novel antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for the diagnosis of all forms of tuberculosis Martin’s formula is best to calculate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol Performance of modified colistin broth disc elution vis-a-vis broth microdilution method for susceptibility testing of Enterobacterales
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1