Health practices, behaviours and quality of life of low-income preschoolers: A community-based cross-sectional comparison study in Singapore

Shang Chee Chong, Ramkumar Aishworiya, Woon Li Seo, Yee Keow Chiong, Gerald Choon-Huat Koh, Jeremy Bingyuan Lin, Lynn Heng, Thahirah Habib Mohd, Young Ern Saw, Yiong Huak Chan, Jing Shi Chua, S. Shorey
{"title":"Health practices, behaviours and quality of life of low-income preschoolers: A community-based cross-sectional comparison study in Singapore","authors":"Shang Chee Chong, Ramkumar Aishworiya, Woon Li Seo, Yee Keow Chiong, Gerald Choon-Huat Koh, Jeremy Bingyuan Lin, Lynn Heng, Thahirah Habib Mohd, Young Ern Saw, Yiong Huak Chan, Jing Shi Chua, S. Shorey","doi":"10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2023168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Children from low-income (LI) families often suffer from poor health, with sub-optimal health practices. This cross-sectional study examined the differences in health habits and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of LI preschool children compared to non-low-income preschool peers (PPG).\n\nMethod: Using data from the social-health Circle of Care-Health Development Screening Programme (CoC-HDSP) in Singapore, 118 LI children and 304 PPG children aged 18 months to 6 years old and their families were recruited from 13 government-funded preschools. Health practices examined included screen time habits, sleep, nutrition, dental health and the children’s HRQoL using PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales.\n\nResults: Majority of the children were aged 4–6 years in kindergarten 1 and 2. There were more Malay children in the LI than the PPG (61.9% versus [vs] 29.3%, P<0.001). Low-income children were more likely to have lower-educated parents (P<0.001). The completed vaccination rate in the LI group was lower than those in PPG (84.7% vs 98.0%, P<0.001). More in the LI group utilised emergency services for acute illnesses (P<0.05). Fewer LI children had ever visited a dentist (47.4% vs 75.4%, P<0.001), and more LI children consumed sweetened drinks daily (33.3% vs 8.6%, P<0.001). The LI group reported poorer-quality sleep (48.3% vs 27.2%, P<0.001), though both groups exceeded the daily recommended screen viewing duration. The LI group scored higher in the social (mean 92.4+12.2 vs 84.3+15.3, P<0.001) and emotional (mean 85.2+15.1 vs 76.6+17.3, P<0.001) domains of the PedsQL 4.0 when compared to PPG.\n\nConclusion: Low-income children have poorer health practices, receive less preventive paediatric care, and utilise more emergency services for acute illnesses. These findings are important for developing interventions that work towards improving the health of LI children.","PeriodicalId":513926,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore","volume":"100 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2023168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Children from low-income (LI) families often suffer from poor health, with sub-optimal health practices. This cross-sectional study examined the differences in health habits and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of LI preschool children compared to non-low-income preschool peers (PPG). Method: Using data from the social-health Circle of Care-Health Development Screening Programme (CoC-HDSP) in Singapore, 118 LI children and 304 PPG children aged 18 months to 6 years old and their families were recruited from 13 government-funded preschools. Health practices examined included screen time habits, sleep, nutrition, dental health and the children’s HRQoL using PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Results: Majority of the children were aged 4–6 years in kindergarten 1 and 2. There were more Malay children in the LI than the PPG (61.9% versus [vs] 29.3%, P<0.001). Low-income children were more likely to have lower-educated parents (P<0.001). The completed vaccination rate in the LI group was lower than those in PPG (84.7% vs 98.0%, P<0.001). More in the LI group utilised emergency services for acute illnesses (P<0.05). Fewer LI children had ever visited a dentist (47.4% vs 75.4%, P<0.001), and more LI children consumed sweetened drinks daily (33.3% vs 8.6%, P<0.001). The LI group reported poorer-quality sleep (48.3% vs 27.2%, P<0.001), though both groups exceeded the daily recommended screen viewing duration. The LI group scored higher in the social (mean 92.4+12.2 vs 84.3+15.3, P<0.001) and emotional (mean 85.2+15.1 vs 76.6+17.3, P<0.001) domains of the PedsQL 4.0 when compared to PPG. Conclusion: Low-income children have poorer health practices, receive less preventive paediatric care, and utilise more emergency services for acute illnesses. These findings are important for developing interventions that work towards improving the health of LI children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低收入学龄前儿童的健康实践、行为和生活质量:新加坡社区横断面比较研究
导言:低收入(LI)家庭的儿童通常健康状况较差,卫生习惯也不够理想。这项横断面研究考察了低收入家庭学龄前儿童与非低收入家庭学龄前儿童在卫生习惯和与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)方面的差异:方法:利用新加坡 "社会保健圈-健康发展筛查计划"(CoC-HDSP)的数据,从 13 所政府资助的学龄前学校招募了 118 名低收入学龄前儿童和 304 名非低收入学龄前儿童及其家庭,他们的年龄在 18 个月至 6 岁之间。调查内容包括屏幕时间习惯、睡眠、营养、牙齿健康以及儿童的 HRQoL(使用 PedsQL 4.0 通用核心量表):大部分儿童年龄为 4-6 岁,就读于幼儿园 1 年级和 2 年级。低收入群体中的马来儿童多于贫困群体(61.9% 对 [vs] 29.3%,P<0.001)。低收入儿童的父母受教育程度较低(P<0.001)。低收入人群中完成疫苗接种的比例低于普通人群(84.7% 对 98.0%,P<0.001)。低收入人群中因急性病而使用急诊服务的人数较多(P<0.05)。少数族裔儿童看牙医的人数较少(47.4% 对 75.4%,P<0.001),少数族裔儿童每天饮用甜饮料的人数较多(33.3% 对 8.6%,P<0.001)。尽管两组儿童每天观看屏幕的时间都超过了建议的时间,但低收入人群的睡眠质量较差(48.3% vs 27.2%,P<0.001)。与 PPG 相比,低收入组在 PedsQL 4.0 的社交(平均 92.4+12.2 vs 84.3+15.3,P<0.001)和情感(平均 85.2+15.1 vs 76.6+17.3,P<0.001)领域得分更高:结论:低收入儿童的卫生习惯较差,接受的儿科预防保健较少,因急性病而使用急诊服务的情况较多。这些发现对于制定干预措施以改善低收入儿童的健康状况非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bridging expertise with machine learning and automated machine learning in clinical medicine Patient’s degree of adherence, challenges & preferences towards medicine taking (PACT) in Singapore The impact of media reporting of suicides on subsequent suicides in Asia: A systematic review HLA-B*5801 testing: Is it time to consider mandatory testing prior to prescribing allopurinol in Singapore? Validating two international warfarin pharmacogenetic dosing algorithms for estimating the maintenance dose for patients in Singapore
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1