An ecological model of experienced stigma during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study in Malaysia

May Kyi Zay Hta, Rachel Sing-Kiat Ting, Esther Zhen-Mei Ong, Liz Jones
{"title":"An ecological model of experienced stigma during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study in Malaysia","authors":"May Kyi Zay Hta, Rachel Sing-Kiat Ting, Esther Zhen-Mei Ong, Liz Jones","doi":"10.1177/1354067x241242409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we adopted an ecological model and relational cognition framework to decolonize pandemic stigma in a non-WEIRD society. We reconstructed the concept of pandemic stigma in an ex-colonized and multicultural society of Southeast Asia region, by conducting a qualitative study in Malaysia to explore their lived experiences of differential treatment during the COVID-19 Pandemic from 2020 to 2022. We interviewed 30 Malaysians aged 18–64 of diverse ethnicities (Malays, Chinese, Indians, and other minorities) through online semi-structured sessions and coded the transcripts through consensus thematic analysis. Results showed that the interviewees’ lived experiences of stigma could be conceptualized as negative interactions with multiple systems: (1) Kinship, (2) Companionship, (3) Organizations, (4) Societal (5) Political, as well as (6) Internal systems. We found that interviewees attributed their experiences of stigma to (1) Individual (self) reasons, (2) Impact of close relationships, (3) Impact of casual social interactions, and (4) Impact of cultural-political context. Our findings could be translated into culturally responsive and context-specific interventions, which addressed systemic injustice that exacerbated the global polarization during the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":309184,"journal":{"name":"Culture & Psychology","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x241242409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we adopted an ecological model and relational cognition framework to decolonize pandemic stigma in a non-WEIRD society. We reconstructed the concept of pandemic stigma in an ex-colonized and multicultural society of Southeast Asia region, by conducting a qualitative study in Malaysia to explore their lived experiences of differential treatment during the COVID-19 Pandemic from 2020 to 2022. We interviewed 30 Malaysians aged 18–64 of diverse ethnicities (Malays, Chinese, Indians, and other minorities) through online semi-structured sessions and coded the transcripts through consensus thematic analysis. Results showed that the interviewees’ lived experiences of stigma could be conceptualized as negative interactions with multiple systems: (1) Kinship, (2) Companionship, (3) Organizations, (4) Societal (5) Political, as well as (6) Internal systems. We found that interviewees attributed their experiences of stigma to (1) Individual (self) reasons, (2) Impact of close relationships, (3) Impact of casual social interactions, and (4) Impact of cultural-political context. Our findings could be translated into culturally responsive and context-specific interventions, which addressed systemic injustice that exacerbated the global polarization during the pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行期间经历的污名化生态模型:马来西亚的定性研究
在本文中,我们采用了生态模型和关系认知框架,在一个非WEIRD社会中对大流行病成见进行去殖民化。我们在马来西亚开展了一项定性研究,探讨了马来西亚人在 2020 年至 2022 年 COVID-19 大流行期间遭受不同待遇的生活经历,从而在东南亚地区这个前殖民地化和多元文化社会中重建了大流行病蔑视的概念。我们通过在线半结构化会议采访了 30 位年龄在 18-64 岁之间的不同种族(马来人、华人、印度人和其他少数民族)的马来西亚人,并通过共识主题分析对记录誊本进行了编码。结果显示,受访者的污名化生活经历可被概念化为与多个系统的负面互动:(1)亲缘系统;(2)同伴系统;(3)组织系统;(4)社会系统;(5)政治系统;以及(6)内部系统。我们发现,受访者将他们的成见经历归因于(1)个人(自我)原因,(2)亲密关系的影响,(3)偶然的社会交往的影响,以及(4)文化政治背景的影响。我们的研究结果可以转化为符合文化和具体情况的干预措施,从而解决大流行病期间加剧全球两极分化的系统性不公正问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ikigai and saudade, cultural meanings lived through the body From lost to leading: How undocumented student resource centers are transforming student lives Book reviews: A dialogical reviewing process Searching for meaning through conspiracy theories. Considerations on the state of the art of psychological literature and definition of a research agenda from a semiotic dynamic cultural perspective Buffer zones in Wayanad: A social constructivist exploration into farmers’ mental health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1