(PM-23) YOGA PRACTICE INTERVENTION AS A COMPLEMENTARY AND INTEGRATIVE TREATMENT FOR COMPULSIVE SEXUAL BEHAVIOR DISORDER: A PILOT STUDY

E. M. Costa, O. H. Takeda, R. Y. Fernandes, W. B. C. Branco, MVPd Cruz, A. G. Guirado, RNdF Vidal, BdO Ferreira, M. Scanavino
{"title":"(PM-23) YOGA PRACTICE INTERVENTION AS A COMPLEMENTARY AND INTEGRATIVE TREATMENT FOR COMPULSIVE SEXUAL BEHAVIOR DISORDER: A PILOT STUDY","authors":"E. M. Costa, O. H. Takeda, R. Y. Fernandes, W. B. C. Branco, MVPd Cruz, A. G. Guirado, RNdF Vidal, BdO Ferreira, M. Scanavino","doi":"10.1093/jsxmed/qdae018.050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Investigate the feasibility of a Yoga Practice intervention (YPI) as an integrative treatment for adult men with compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD) explored through the attendance and adherence treatment protocol, and the functionality of data collection mechanisms.\n \n \n \n For this study, twelve men diagnosed with CSBD and that did not present substance-use, paraphilic, psychotic, current manic or hypomanic, neurocognitive disorders, gender dysphoria, physical limitations, already practiced yoga or started psychotherapy more than six months ago were randomized in a 2-arm, double-blind clinical trial, comparing a Kundalini YPI with a supervised muscle stretching 12-week program. Participants submitted their applications online on baseline, times 1 (4 weeks), 2 (8 weeks) and time 3 (12 weeks) and the proportion of treatment and protocol adherence, teacher adherence, and allocation concealment were estimated.\n \n \n \n The age range was 24 to 47 years old. 58% were single or widower, 41% married or common-law; 75% were caucasians and 25% afro-descendants. The minimum schooling was elementary, (50% finished college). Average family income was $ 1130. There was no statistically significant association between sociodemographic and intervention groups. The patient attendance was 58%, patient adherence to the protocol 30%, professors' adherence to the protocol reached 100%, and the allocation concealment for the double-blind method ensured 100%. The answers of the self-responsive online questionnaires on psychopathologic variables reached 87% of the requested answers, and the daily practices at home 45%.\n \n \n \n Although the YPI evaluated for CSBD was acceptable and functional, this pilot indicates changes in procedures to improve attendance and adherence of patients.\n \n \n \n No conflict.\n","PeriodicalId":377411,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Sexual Medicine","volume":"122 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae018.050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investigate the feasibility of a Yoga Practice intervention (YPI) as an integrative treatment for adult men with compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD) explored through the attendance and adherence treatment protocol, and the functionality of data collection mechanisms. For this study, twelve men diagnosed with CSBD and that did not present substance-use, paraphilic, psychotic, current manic or hypomanic, neurocognitive disorders, gender dysphoria, physical limitations, already practiced yoga or started psychotherapy more than six months ago were randomized in a 2-arm, double-blind clinical trial, comparing a Kundalini YPI with a supervised muscle stretching 12-week program. Participants submitted their applications online on baseline, times 1 (4 weeks), 2 (8 weeks) and time 3 (12 weeks) and the proportion of treatment and protocol adherence, teacher adherence, and allocation concealment were estimated. The age range was 24 to 47 years old. 58% were single or widower, 41% married or common-law; 75% were caucasians and 25% afro-descendants. The minimum schooling was elementary, (50% finished college). Average family income was $ 1130. There was no statistically significant association between sociodemographic and intervention groups. The patient attendance was 58%, patient adherence to the protocol 30%, professors' adherence to the protocol reached 100%, and the allocation concealment for the double-blind method ensured 100%. The answers of the self-responsive online questionnaires on psychopathologic variables reached 87% of the requested answers, and the daily practices at home 45%. Although the YPI evaluated for CSBD was acceptable and functional, this pilot indicates changes in procedures to improve attendance and adherence of patients. No conflict.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(PM-23) 瑜伽练习干预作为强迫性行为障碍的补充和综合治疗:试点研究
调查瑜伽练习干预(YPI)作为一种综合疗法对患有强迫性性行为障碍(CSBD)的成年男性的可行性,并通过出勤和坚持治疗方案以及数据收集机制的功能进行探讨。 在这项研究中,12 名被诊断患有 CSBD 的男性被随机纳入一项双臂、双盲临床试验,比较昆达利尼 YPI 与为期 12 周的肌肉拉伸监督计划。参与者在基线、第1次(4周)、第2次(8周)和第3次(12周)时在线提交申请,并对治疗和方案依从性、教师依从性和分配隐藏性的比例进行估算。 年龄范围为 24 至 47 岁。58%为单身或鳏夫,41%为已婚或同居;75%为白种人,25%为非洲裔。最低学历为小学(50%完成了大学学业)。平均家庭收入为 1130 美元。社会人口学组和干预组之间没有明显的统计学关联。患者出勤率为 58%,患者对治疗方案的依从性为 30%,教授对治疗方案的依从性为 100%,双盲法的分配隐藏率为 100%。关于心理病理变量的在线自答问卷的答案达到了要求答案的 87%,家庭日常实践的答案达到了 45%。 尽管针对 CSBD 的 YPI 评估是可接受的、实用的,但该试点表明,应改变程序以提高患者的出席率和依从性。 无冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Delineating patient errors in an intracavernosal injection program. Cosmetic penile enhancement procedures: an SMSNA position statement. The relationship between female orgasmic disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and depression in Dominican women. Associated factors of vaginal laxity and female sexual function: a cross-sectional study. The effect of combination treatment with low-intensity shockwave therapy and daily tadalafil on severe erectile dysfunction: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1