Postoperative adhesions in urgent gynecological practice — the analysis of etiological and pathophysiological factors

O. V. Gudz, A. N. Sulima
{"title":"Postoperative adhesions in urgent gynecological practice — the analysis of etiological and pathophysiological factors","authors":"O. V. Gudz, A. N. Sulima","doi":"10.17816/jowd562924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adhesive process in the abdomen in the postoperative period is still a stumbling block for modern medicine. This is due to the fact that surgical activity is increasing, but there is no common solution for precaution. Complications associated with adhesions after urgent gynecological interventions are some of the causes of infertility, which becomes a problem for not only healthcare and society, the patient and their future, but also the government, as it leads to population decline. \nThis review is focused on the study of the adhesive process etiology in surgical gynecology and the pathogenesis traits. We analyzed the literature on the Web of Science, eLibrary, Scopus, and PubMed/Medline using the following keywords: “adhesions,” “adhesive process,” “review,” “operations,” “pathogenesis of formation of adhesions,” and “reproductive dysfunction”. The research included full-text sources and literature reviews on the studied subject. Articles not related directly to the topic of the adhesive process in the postoperative period were excluded from the review. \nThis literature review has demonstrated that despite the ongoing research of scientists all over the world into postoperative adhesion, its etiology and pathogenesis remain not fully understood and disclosed. This dictates the need to continue studying the adhesive process and searching for new solutions in prevention. As far as the attention of surgeons and reproductive specialists is focused on the issues of preventing the adhesive process, we are confident that in the near future, scientists will find a unified solution to this complex problem and practical healthcare specialists will successfully implement it.","PeriodicalId":16623,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/jowd562924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adhesive process in the abdomen in the postoperative period is still a stumbling block for modern medicine. This is due to the fact that surgical activity is increasing, but there is no common solution for precaution. Complications associated with adhesions after urgent gynecological interventions are some of the causes of infertility, which becomes a problem for not only healthcare and society, the patient and their future, but also the government, as it leads to population decline. This review is focused on the study of the adhesive process etiology in surgical gynecology and the pathogenesis traits. We analyzed the literature on the Web of Science, eLibrary, Scopus, and PubMed/Medline using the following keywords: “adhesions,” “adhesive process,” “review,” “operations,” “pathogenesis of formation of adhesions,” and “reproductive dysfunction”. The research included full-text sources and literature reviews on the studied subject. Articles not related directly to the topic of the adhesive process in the postoperative period were excluded from the review. This literature review has demonstrated that despite the ongoing research of scientists all over the world into postoperative adhesion, its etiology and pathogenesis remain not fully understood and disclosed. This dictates the need to continue studying the adhesive process and searching for new solutions in prevention. As far as the attention of surgeons and reproductive specialists is focused on the issues of preventing the adhesive process, we are confident that in the near future, scientists will find a unified solution to this complex problem and practical healthcare specialists will successfully implement it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇科急诊中的术后粘连--病因和病理生理因素分析
术后腹部的粘连过程仍然是现代医学的绊脚石。这是因为手术活动越来越多,但却没有共同的预防方案。妇科紧急干预后与粘连相关的并发症是导致不孕不育的部分原因,这不仅是医疗保健和社会、病人及其未来的问题,也是政府的问题,因为它会导致人口下降。本综述主要研究妇科手术中粘连过程病因及发病特征。我们使用以下关键词对 Web of Science、eLibrary、Scopus 和 PubMed/Medline 上的文献进行了分析:"粘连"、"粘连过程"、"综述"、"手术"、"粘连形成的发病机制 "和 "生殖功能障碍"。研究包括研究主题的全文来源和文献综述。与术后粘连过程这一主题没有直接关系的文章不在综述范围之内。本文献综述表明,尽管全世界的科学家都在对术后粘连进行研究,但对其病因和发病机理仍未完全了解和揭示。因此有必要继续研究粘连过程并寻找新的预防方案。只要外科医生和生殖专家将注意力集中在预防粘连过程的问题上,我们相信,在不久的将来,科学家们将找到解决这一复杂问题的统一方案,而实际的医疗专家们也将成功地实施这一方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases
Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
The role of cervicovaginal microbiota in the occurrence of severe cervical intraepithelial dysplasia Evaluation of the effectiveness of innovative methods of focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization in the treatment of uterine fibroids IGF1R rs907806 and GHSR rs572169 genetic variants in fetal macrosomia Assessment of endometrial and subendometrial three-dimensional power Doppler angiography evaluated by the VOCAL method in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles on hormone replacement therapy Peculiarities of anesthesia for caesarean section in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1