Remote sensing-based mapping of structural building damage in the Ahr valley

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Flood Risk Management Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1111/jfr3.12983
Guilherme Samprogna Mohor, Tobias Sieg, Oliver Koch, Aaron Buhrmann, Holger Maiwald, Jochen Schwarz, Annegret H. Thieken
{"title":"Remote sensing-based mapping of structural building damage in the Ahr valley","authors":"Guilherme Samprogna Mohor,&nbsp;Tobias Sieg,&nbsp;Oliver Koch,&nbsp;Aaron Buhrmann,&nbsp;Holger Maiwald,&nbsp;Jochen Schwarz,&nbsp;Annegret H. Thieken","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.12983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Flood damage data are needed for various applications. Structural damage of buildings can reflect not only the economic damage but also the life-threatening condition of a building, which provide crucial information for disaster response and recovery. Since traditional on-site data collection shortly after a disaster is challenging, remote sensing data can be of great help, cover a wider area and be deployed earlier in time than on-site surveys. However, this has its challenges and limitations. We elucidate on that by presenting two case studies from flash floods in Germany. First, we assessed the reliability of an existing flood damage schema, which differentiates from minor (structural) damage to complete building collapse. We compared two on-site raters of the 2016 Braunsbach flood, reaching an excellent level of reliability. Second, we mapped structural building damage after the flood in the Ahr valley in 2021 using a textured 3D mesh and orthophotos. Here, we evaluated the remote sense-based damage mapping done by three raters. Although the heterogeneity of ratings using remote sensing data is larger than among on-site ratings, we consider it fit-for-purpose when compared with on-site mapping, especially for event documentation and as basis for financial damage estimation and less complex numerical modelling.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.12983","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.12983","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flood damage data are needed for various applications. Structural damage of buildings can reflect not only the economic damage but also the life-threatening condition of a building, which provide crucial information for disaster response and recovery. Since traditional on-site data collection shortly after a disaster is challenging, remote sensing data can be of great help, cover a wider area and be deployed earlier in time than on-site surveys. However, this has its challenges and limitations. We elucidate on that by presenting two case studies from flash floods in Germany. First, we assessed the reliability of an existing flood damage schema, which differentiates from minor (structural) damage to complete building collapse. We compared two on-site raters of the 2016 Braunsbach flood, reaching an excellent level of reliability. Second, we mapped structural building damage after the flood in the Ahr valley in 2021 using a textured 3D mesh and orthophotos. Here, we evaluated the remote sense-based damage mapping done by three raters. Although the heterogeneity of ratings using remote sensing data is larger than among on-site ratings, we consider it fit-for-purpose when compared with on-site mapping, especially for event documentation and as basis for financial damage estimation and less complex numerical modelling.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于遥感技术的阿赫尔河谷建筑结构损坏测绘
各种应用都需要洪水破坏数据。建筑物的结构损坏不仅能反映经济损失,还能反映建筑物的生命威胁状况,为灾害响应和恢复提供重要信息。由于传统的灾后现场数据收集工作难度很大,遥感数据可以提供很大的帮助,覆盖更广的区域,而且比现场调查更早部署。然而,这也有其挑战和局限性。我们通过介绍德国山洪暴发时的两个案例来阐明这一点。首先,我们评估了现有洪水损害模式的可靠性,该模式将轻微(结构性)损害与建筑物完全倒塌区分开来。我们比较了 2016 年布劳恩斯巴赫洪水的两位现场评分员,结果显示其可靠性达到了极高的水平。其次,我们使用纹理三维网格和正射影像绘制了 2021 年阿赫河谷洪灾后的建筑结构损坏图。在此,我们对三位测绘人员绘制的基于遥感的损害绘图进行了评估。虽然与现场测绘相比,遥感数据测绘的不一致性较大,但我们认为与现场测绘相比,遥感数据测绘更适合用于事件记录、经济损失估算和不太复杂的数字建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
期刊最新文献
Toward Sustainable Flood Resilience: Assessing Efficacy of Paddy Field Dams to Reduce Floods in Jakarta Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle-Based Multispectral Imagery for River Soil Monitoring Putting the English Flooding of 2019–2021 in the Context of Antecedent Conditions Bridge Collapse in Mutsu, Aomori Prefecture, Japan in 2021 Attribution of Flood Forecasting Errors From a Multi-Model Perspective in Milan Urbanized River Basins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1