(PM-06) A RARE CASE OF SCROTAL URETHROCUTANEOUS FISTULA SECONDARY TO EROSION OF PENILE PROSTHESIS CONNECTOR TUBING

S. Garcia, J. Santander, S. Peña Rodríguez, C. Diaz Ritter, D. Pomar, J. Azuero, M. P. Mogollón
{"title":"(PM-06) A RARE CASE OF SCROTAL URETHROCUTANEOUS FISTULA SECONDARY TO EROSION OF PENILE PROSTHESIS CONNECTOR TUBING","authors":"S. Garcia, J. Santander, S. Peña Rodríguez, C. Diaz Ritter, D. Pomar, J. Azuero, M. P. Mogollón","doi":"10.1093/jsxmed/qdae018.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The scrotal urethrocutaneous fistula is an uncommon pathology which can lead to serious complications, such as infections, scrotal abscesses, or even Fournier’s gangrene. We present an unusual case of scrotal urethrocutaneous fistula secondary to erosion of a penile prosthesis tubing in a patient with a history of erectile dysfunction.\n \n \n \n A 68-year-old patient with no previous comorbidities and a history of prostate adenocarcinoma that was treated with radical prostatectomy + lymphadenectomy, without the need for subsequent adjuvant therapy. He was diagnosed with erectile dysfunction after surgery, refractory to intracavernous therapy therefore required a 3-component penile implant placement procedure performed extra-institutionally. Two years after the surgery, he consulted with our institution for scrotal pain and urine leak from the scrotum during micturition. Physical examination shows extrusion of prosthesis tubes in the scrotal area with no signs of infection or exposure of the cylinders. The patient was hospitalized for management with antibiotics and to replace the penile implant.\n A retrograde urethrography with contrast medium was performed during surgery. Fluoroscopy showed a fistulous pathway between the penile urethra and the scrotum. No passage of the contrast to the corpora cavernosa was seen. The urethral lesion and fistula were identified and repaired. A malleable prosthesis was used, considering the amount of scar tissue. The patient had an adequate postoperative period. A urethral catheter and a cystotomy were used for six weeks. After catheter removal, a voiding cystogram was performed, finding no fistulas. The patient was followed for 11 months with no complications.\n \n \n \n Although scrotal urethrocutaneous fistulas are an infrequent complication after penile prosthesis implantation, a timely diagnosis is essential for conservative treatment and to avoid life-threatening complications.\n \n \n \n No conflict.\n","PeriodicalId":377411,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Sexual Medicine","volume":"124 48","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae018.038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The scrotal urethrocutaneous fistula is an uncommon pathology which can lead to serious complications, such as infections, scrotal abscesses, or even Fournier’s gangrene. We present an unusual case of scrotal urethrocutaneous fistula secondary to erosion of a penile prosthesis tubing in a patient with a history of erectile dysfunction. A 68-year-old patient with no previous comorbidities and a history of prostate adenocarcinoma that was treated with radical prostatectomy + lymphadenectomy, without the need for subsequent adjuvant therapy. He was diagnosed with erectile dysfunction after surgery, refractory to intracavernous therapy therefore required a 3-component penile implant placement procedure performed extra-institutionally. Two years after the surgery, he consulted with our institution for scrotal pain and urine leak from the scrotum during micturition. Physical examination shows extrusion of prosthesis tubes in the scrotal area with no signs of infection or exposure of the cylinders. The patient was hospitalized for management with antibiotics and to replace the penile implant. A retrograde urethrography with contrast medium was performed during surgery. Fluoroscopy showed a fistulous pathway between the penile urethra and the scrotum. No passage of the contrast to the corpora cavernosa was seen. The urethral lesion and fistula were identified and repaired. A malleable prosthesis was used, considering the amount of scar tissue. The patient had an adequate postoperative period. A urethral catheter and a cystotomy were used for six weeks. After catheter removal, a voiding cystogram was performed, finding no fistulas. The patient was followed for 11 months with no complications. Although scrotal urethrocutaneous fistulas are an infrequent complication after penile prosthesis implantation, a timely diagnosis is essential for conservative treatment and to avoid life-threatening complications. No conflict.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(pm-06) 阴茎假体连接管侵蚀继发阴囊尿道皮肤瘘的罕见病例
阴囊尿道皮肤瘘是一种不常见的病理现象,可导致严重的并发症,如感染、阴囊脓肿甚至福尼尔坏疽。我们介绍了一例不寻常的阴囊尿道皮肤瘘病例,该病例是继发于阴茎假体管侵蚀的阴囊尿道皮肤瘘,患者有勃起功能障碍病史。 患者现年 68 岁,既往无合并症,曾患前列腺腺癌,接受过前列腺癌根治术+淋巴结切除术,无需后续辅助治疗。术后,他被诊断出患有勃起功能障碍,阴茎海绵体内治疗无效,因此需要在院外进行三部分阴茎植入手术。术后两年,他因阴囊疼痛和排尿时阴囊漏尿到我院就诊。体格检查显示,阴囊部位的假体管被挤出,但没有感染或圆柱体外露的迹象。患者住院接受抗生素治疗,并更换了阴茎假体。手术期间进行了造影剂逆行尿道造影。透视显示阴茎尿道和阴囊之间有一条瘘道。造影剂未进入阴茎海绵体。确定并修复了尿道病变和瘘管。考虑到瘢痕组织较多,使用了可塑性假体。患者术后恢复良好。使用尿道导尿管和膀胱切开术六周。移除导尿管后,进行了排尿膀胱造影,没有发现瘘管。对患者进行了 11 个月的随访,未发现并发症。 虽然阴囊尿道皮肤瘘是阴茎假体植入术后的一种并发症,但及时诊断对于保守治疗和避免危及生命的并发症至关重要。 无冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Delineating patient errors in an intracavernosal injection program. Cosmetic penile enhancement procedures: an SMSNA position statement. The relationship between female orgasmic disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and depression in Dominican women. Associated factors of vaginal laxity and female sexual function: a cross-sectional study. The effect of combination treatment with low-intensity shockwave therapy and daily tadalafil on severe erectile dysfunction: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1