Validation of Left Atrial Volume Correction for Single Plane Method on Four-Chamber Cine Cardiac MRI

IF 5.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI:10.3390/tomography10040035
Hosamadin Assadi, Nicholas Sawh, Ciara Bailey, Gareth Matthews, Rui Li, C. Grafton-Clarke, Z. Mehmood, Bahman Kasmai, Peter Swoboda, Andrew J Swift, R. J. V. D. Geest, Pankaj Garg
{"title":"Validation of Left Atrial Volume Correction for Single Plane Method on Four-Chamber Cine Cardiac MRI","authors":"Hosamadin Assadi, Nicholas Sawh, Ciara Bailey, Gareth Matthews, Rui Li, C. Grafton-Clarke, Z. Mehmood, Bahman Kasmai, Peter Swoboda, Andrew J Swift, R. J. V. D. Geest, Pankaj Garg","doi":"10.3390/tomography10040035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Left atrial (LA) assessment is an important marker of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) accurately quantifies LA volume and function based on biplane long-axis imaging. We aimed to validate single-plane-derived LA indices against the biplane method to simplify the post-processing of cine CMR. Methods: In this study, 100 patients from Leeds Teaching Hospitals were used as the derivation cohort. Bias correction for the single plane method was applied and subsequently validated in 79 subjects. Results: There were significant differences between the biplane and single plane mean LA maximum and minimum volumes and LA ejection fraction (EF) (all p < 0.01). After correcting for biases in the validation cohort, significant correlations in all LA indices were observed (0.89 to 0.98). The area under the curve (AUC) for the single plane to predict biplane cutoffs of LA maximum volume ≥ 112 mL was 0.97, LA minimum volume ≥ 44 mL was 0.99, LA stroke volume (SV) ≤ 21 mL was 1, and LA EF ≤ 46% was 1, (all p < 0.001). Conclusions: LA volumetric and functional assessment by the single plane method has a systematic bias compared to the biplane method. After bias correction, single plane LA volume and function are comparable to the biplane method.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"7 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography10040035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Left atrial (LA) assessment is an important marker of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) accurately quantifies LA volume and function based on biplane long-axis imaging. We aimed to validate single-plane-derived LA indices against the biplane method to simplify the post-processing of cine CMR. Methods: In this study, 100 patients from Leeds Teaching Hospitals were used as the derivation cohort. Bias correction for the single plane method was applied and subsequently validated in 79 subjects. Results: There were significant differences between the biplane and single plane mean LA maximum and minimum volumes and LA ejection fraction (EF) (all p < 0.01). After correcting for biases in the validation cohort, significant correlations in all LA indices were observed (0.89 to 0.98). The area under the curve (AUC) for the single plane to predict biplane cutoffs of LA maximum volume ≥ 112 mL was 0.97, LA minimum volume ≥ 44 mL was 0.99, LA stroke volume (SV) ≤ 21 mL was 1, and LA EF ≤ 46% was 1, (all p < 0.001). Conclusions: LA volumetric and functional assessment by the single plane method has a systematic bias compared to the biplane method. After bias correction, single plane LA volume and function are comparable to the biplane method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单平面法左心房容积校正在四腔正交心脏磁共振成像上的验证
背景:左心房(LA)评估是心血管不良后果的重要标志。心血管磁共振(CMR)可根据双平面长轴成像准确量化 LA 的容积和功能。我们的目的是将单平面得出的 LA 指数与双平面方法进行对比验证,以简化 cine CMR 的后处理。方法:本研究以利兹教学医院的 100 名患者为推导队列。对单平面方法进行了偏差校正,随后在 79 名受试者中进行了验证。结果:双平面方法与单平面方法之间存在显著差异:双平面和单平面的平均 LA 最大和最小容积以及 LA 射血分数(EF)之间存在明显差异(均 p <0.01)。在校正验证队列中的偏差后,观察到所有 LA 指数均有显著相关性(0.89 至 0.98)。单平面预测 LA 最大容积≥ 112 mL 的双平面临界值的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.97,LA 最小容积≥ 44 mL 的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.99,LA 搏出量(SV)≤ 21 mL 的曲线下面积(AUC)为 1,LA EF≤ 46% 的曲线下面积(AUC)为 1,(所有 p 均<0.001)。结论:单平面法与双平面法相比,LA容积和功能评估存在系统性偏差。校正偏差后,单平面 LA 容量和功能与双平面法相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Bio Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of biomaterials and biointerfaces including and beyond the traditional biosensing, biomedical and therapeutic applications. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrates knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important bio applications. The journal is specifically interested in work that addresses the relationship between structure and function and assesses the stability and degradation of materials under relevant environmental and biological conditions.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Green Light-Mediated Corneal Cross-Linking on the Delivery of Rose Bengal and Vancomycin in Staphylococcus aureus-Infected Eyes. Low-Cost Nucleic-Acid-Based Radial Flow Assay for the Detection of GSTP1 Promoter DNA Methylation in Prostate Cancer. Structure-Interfacial Property Relationships of Thiolated Chitosan Films on Gold Surfaces for Plasmonic Biosensing. Fabrication of a Silk-Glycerol-Based Flexible Electrode Decorated with WO3 Nanorods for Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Detection of Bacteria. Tuning Hopeite-Phase Dominant Phosphate Coating with Dy-Doped MoS2 for Improved Antibacterial Surface Protection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1