Socioeconomic support, quality of life, and prognosis of frailty among the older adults

Huai-Yu Wang, Yuming Huang, Meng-Ru Zhou, Hao-Yue Jiang, Yu-Han Zong, Xi-Huan Zhu, Xiaojing Sun
{"title":"Socioeconomic support, quality of life, and prognosis of frailty among the older adults","authors":"Huai-Yu Wang,&nbsp;Yuming Huang,&nbsp;Meng-Ru Zhou,&nbsp;Hao-Yue Jiang,&nbsp;Yu-Han Zong,&nbsp;Xi-Huan Zhu,&nbsp;Xiaojing Sun","doi":"10.1002/hcs2.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Although socioeconomic support is recommended for frailty management, its association with the prognosis of frailty is unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using data from participants aged ≥65 years in the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (2008–2018), the associations between socioeconomic support (source of income, medical insurance, community support, living status), onset of prefrailty/frailty, and worsening of prefrailty, were analyzed using multinominal logistic regression models. The associations between self-reported low quality of life (QoL) and reversion of prefrailty/frailty were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression models. Associations with mortality risk were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 13,859 participants (mean age: 85.8 ± 11.1 years) containing 2056 centenarians were included. Financial dependence was a risk factor for low QoL among prefrail/frail individuals, but not among robust individuals. Having commercial or other insurance, and receiving social support from the community were protective factors for low QoL among prefrail/frail individuals and for the worsening of prefrailty. Continuing to work was a risk factor for low QoL, but a protective factor for worsening of prefrailty. A negative association between continuing to work and mortality existed in prefrail individuals aged &lt;85 years and ≥85 years. Living alone was a risk factor for low QoL, but was not significantly associated with frailty prognosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Prefrail and frail individuals were vulnerable to changes in socioeconomic support and more sensitive to it compared with robust individuals. Preferential policies regarding financial support, social support, and medical insurance should be developed for individuals with frailty.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100601,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Science","volume":"3 2","pages":"101-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hcs2.88","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hcs2.88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although socioeconomic support is recommended for frailty management, its association with the prognosis of frailty is unclear.

Methods

Using data from participants aged ≥65 years in the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (2008–2018), the associations between socioeconomic support (source of income, medical insurance, community support, living status), onset of prefrailty/frailty, and worsening of prefrailty, were analyzed using multinominal logistic regression models. The associations between self-reported low quality of life (QoL) and reversion of prefrailty/frailty were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression models. Associations with mortality risk were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression models.

Results

A total of 13,859 participants (mean age: 85.8 ± 11.1 years) containing 2056 centenarians were included. Financial dependence was a risk factor for low QoL among prefrail/frail individuals, but not among robust individuals. Having commercial or other insurance, and receiving social support from the community were protective factors for low QoL among prefrail/frail individuals and for the worsening of prefrailty. Continuing to work was a risk factor for low QoL, but a protective factor for worsening of prefrailty. A negative association between continuing to work and mortality existed in prefrail individuals aged <85 years and ≥85 years. Living alone was a risk factor for low QoL, but was not significantly associated with frailty prognosis.

Conclusions

Prefrail and frail individuals were vulnerable to changes in socioeconomic support and more sensitive to it compared with robust individuals. Preferential policies regarding financial support, social support, and medical insurance should be developed for individuals with frailty.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人的社会经济支持、生活质量和虚弱预后
利用中国健康长寿纵向调查(2008-2018年)中年龄≥65岁的参与者的数据,采用多项式逻辑回归模型分析了社会经济支持(收入来源、医疗保险、社区支持、生活状况)、虚弱前期/虚弱的发生以及虚弱前期恶化之间的关系。使用多变量逻辑回归模型分析了自我报告的低生活质量(QoL)与虚弱前期/虚弱期恢复之间的关系。共纳入 13859 名参与者(平均年龄:85.8 ± 11.1 岁),其中包括 2056 名百岁老人。经济依赖是导致预衰老/衰老者生活质量低的一个风险因素,但在健壮者中并非如此。拥有商业保险或其他保险以及从社区获得社会支持是导致早老/衰老者低生活质量和早老恶化的保护因素。继续工作是导致低 QoL 的风险因素,但却是导致体弱前期恶化的保护因素。在年龄小于 85 岁和大于 85 岁的体弱多病者中,继续工作与死亡率之间存在负相关。独居是导致低生活质量的一个风险因素,但与虚弱预后并无显著关联。与体格健壮的人相比,虚弱前期和虚弱的人容易受到社会经济支持变化的影响,而且对这种变化更加敏感。应为体弱者制定经济支持、社会支持和医疗保险方面的优惠政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study protocol: A national cross-sectional study on psychology and behavior investigation of Chinese residents in 2023. Caregiving in Asia: Priority areas for research, policy, and practice to support family caregivers. Innovative public strategies in response to COVID-19: A review of practices from China. Sixty years of ethical evolution: The 2024 revision of the Declaration of Helsinki (DoH). A novel ensemble ARIMA-LSTM approach for evaluating COVID-19 cases and future outbreak preparedness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1