Effective interventions to increase representation of under-served groups in randomised trials in UK and Ireland: a scoping literature review

K. Biggs, Caroline Dix, Frances Shiely, Shaun Treweek, V. Shepherd, Athene Lane, Heidi R Green, Talia Isaacs, Andrew Willis, Cindy Cooper
{"title":"Effective interventions to increase representation of under-served groups in randomised trials in UK and Ireland: a scoping literature review","authors":"K. Biggs, Caroline Dix, Frances Shiely, Shaun Treweek, V. Shepherd, Athene Lane, Heidi R Green, Talia Isaacs, Andrew Willis, Cindy Cooper","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13524.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Participants in clinical trials often do not reflect the populations that could benefit from the treatments being investigated. There are known barriers to trial participation for under-served groups, but limited evidence on strategies to alleviate these barriers to improve representation. This scoping review aimed to identify effective interventions and design features that improve the representation `of under-served groups in trials, focusing on the UK and Ireland. Methods We included methodological research studies that reported interventions to improve representation of ethnic minority groups, socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, older people, or those with impaired capacity to consent to randomised controlled trials, conducted in the UK and Ireland, published between 2000–2021. Systematic searches were conducted in November 2021 and data were independently extracted by two authors and narratively synthesised. Results Seven studies were included: one randomised controlled study embedded in five trials, one mixed-methods study, and five studies reporting ‘lessons learnt’ from one trial. We categorised the 47 reported interventions or strategies into nine broad themes: Recruitment sites, recruitment settings, community engagement, and communication with participants, incentives, inclusion criteria, flexibility, patient documentation, and the consent process. Only 28/47 interventions were evaluated, 23 of which were comparison of recruitment pathways. The randomised study found that a £100 incentive mentioned in the invitation letter increased positive responses overall across drug trials in cardiovascular disease and hypertension, but not for older people or those living in the most deprived areas. Invitation letters via GPs and working with communities were reported as successful recruitment pathways in recruiting different under-served populations. Conclusions Interventions aiming to improve the recruitment of under-served groups in the UK and Ireland were reported across seven papers, but their effectiveness was rarely rigorously evaluated. Included studies were context specific. Using a variety of recruitment methods is likely to help achieve a more diverse cohort.","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":" 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13524.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Participants in clinical trials often do not reflect the populations that could benefit from the treatments being investigated. There are known barriers to trial participation for under-served groups, but limited evidence on strategies to alleviate these barriers to improve representation. This scoping review aimed to identify effective interventions and design features that improve the representation `of under-served groups in trials, focusing on the UK and Ireland. Methods We included methodological research studies that reported interventions to improve representation of ethnic minority groups, socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, older people, or those with impaired capacity to consent to randomised controlled trials, conducted in the UK and Ireland, published between 2000–2021. Systematic searches were conducted in November 2021 and data were independently extracted by two authors and narratively synthesised. Results Seven studies were included: one randomised controlled study embedded in five trials, one mixed-methods study, and five studies reporting ‘lessons learnt’ from one trial. We categorised the 47 reported interventions or strategies into nine broad themes: Recruitment sites, recruitment settings, community engagement, and communication with participants, incentives, inclusion criteria, flexibility, patient documentation, and the consent process. Only 28/47 interventions were evaluated, 23 of which were comparison of recruitment pathways. The randomised study found that a £100 incentive mentioned in the invitation letter increased positive responses overall across drug trials in cardiovascular disease and hypertension, but not for older people or those living in the most deprived areas. Invitation letters via GPs and working with communities were reported as successful recruitment pathways in recruiting different under-served populations. Conclusions Interventions aiming to improve the recruitment of under-served groups in the UK and Ireland were reported across seven papers, but their effectiveness was rarely rigorously evaluated. Included studies were context specific. Using a variety of recruitment methods is likely to help achieve a more diverse cohort.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国和爱尔兰为增加服务不足群体在随机试验中的代表性而采取的有效干预措施:范围界定文献综述
背景 临床试验的参与者往往不能反映可从所研究的治疗中受益的人群。众所周知,服务不足群体在参与试验时会遇到一些障碍,但有关减轻这些障碍以提高代表性的策略的证据却很有限。本次范围界定综述旨在以英国和爱尔兰为重点,确定有效的干预措施和设计特点,以提高 "服务不足群体 "在试验中的代表性。方法 我们纳入了 2000-2021 年间在英国和爱尔兰进行的方法学研究,这些研究报道了为提高少数民族群体、社会经济弱势群体、老年人或能力受损者在随机对照试验中的代表性而采取的干预措施。2021 年 11 月进行了系统检索,由两位作者独立提取数据并进行叙述性综合。结果 共纳入七项研究:一项随机对照研究包含在五项试验中,一项混合方法研究,以及五项报告从一项试验中 "吸取教训 "的研究。我们将 47 项报告的干预措施或策略分为九大主题:招募地点、招募环境、社区参与、与参与者的沟通、激励措施、纳入标准、灵活性、患者文件以及同意程序。只有 28/47 项干预措施接受了评估,其中 23 项是对招募途径的比较。随机研究发现,邀请信中提到的 100 英镑奖励措施提高了心血管疾病和高血压药物试验参与者的积极反应,但对于老年人或生活在最贫困地区的人来说,积极反应并不明显。据报道,通过全科医生发出邀请函以及与社区合作是招募不同服务不足人群的成功招募途径。结论 有七篇论文报道了旨在改善英国和爱尔兰服务不足人群招募情况的干预措施,但很少对其有效性进行严格评估。所纳入的研究具有特定的背景。使用各种招募方法可能有助于获得更多样化的群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
improving Pain mAnagement for childreN and young people attendeD by Ambulance (PANDA): protocol for a realist review. Mapping decision-making pathways: Determination of intervention entry points for diagnostic tests in suspected serious infection. Pharmacist-led DE-eSCALation of opioids post-surgical dischargE (DESCALE) - A multi-centre, non-randomised, feasibility study protocol. Pulmonary aspiration during pregnancy or immediately postpartum in the UK: A population-based case-control study. The UK Breast Cancer in Pregnancy (UKBCiP) Study. Incidence, diagnosis, management and short-term outcomes of breast cancer first diagnosed during pregnancy in the United Kingdom: A population-based descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1