Pushback or Backlash against the European Court of Human Rights?

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Russian Politics Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI:10.30965/24518921-00901007
Agnieszka Kubal, Marcin Mrowicki
{"title":"Pushback or Backlash against the European Court of Human Rights?","authors":"Agnieszka Kubal, Marcin Mrowicki","doi":"10.30965/24518921-00901007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article uses the theoretical model of ‘pushback-backlash’ developed by Madsen, Cebulak and Wiebusch (2018) for a comparative analysis of the differing patterns of reaction to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) by two Eastern European countries – Russia, and Poland. We argue that Russian Constitutional Court’s (RCC) rejection of ECtHR authority, while extraordinary and legislated by the Duma, was in fact self-limiting, as observed in politically motivated cases. The decisions of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal (PCT), by contrast, go further than pushback, as rights enshrined in the Convention may soon become illusory to Polish citizens. Having chosen a country that was expelled from the Convention (Russia), and one that is still a member (Poland), we suggest opening the conceptual binary between ‘pushback’ and ‘backlash’ towards a dynamic continuum.","PeriodicalId":37176,"journal":{"name":"Russian Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/24518921-00901007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article uses the theoretical model of ‘pushback-backlash’ developed by Madsen, Cebulak and Wiebusch (2018) for a comparative analysis of the differing patterns of reaction to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) by two Eastern European countries – Russia, and Poland. We argue that Russian Constitutional Court’s (RCC) rejection of ECtHR authority, while extraordinary and legislated by the Duma, was in fact self-limiting, as observed in politically motivated cases. The decisions of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal (PCT), by contrast, go further than pushback, as rights enshrined in the Convention may soon become illusory to Polish citizens. Having chosen a country that was expelled from the Convention (Russia), and one that is still a member (Poland), we suggest opening the conceptual binary between ‘pushback’ and ‘backlash’ towards a dynamic continuum.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对欧洲人权法院的推崇还是反弹?
本文采用马德森、塞布拉克和维布希(2018)提出的 "推回-反冲 "理论模型,对两个东欧国家--俄罗斯和波兰--对欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)的不同反应模式进行比较分析。我们认为,俄罗斯宪法法院(RCC)拒绝欧洲人权法院的权威,虽然非同寻常并由杜马立法,但事实上是自我限制的,正如在出于政治动机的案件中观察到的那样。相比之下,波兰宪法法庭(PCT)的裁决比回击更进一步,因为对波兰公民而言,《公约》中规定的权利可能很快就会成为泡影。在选择了一个被驱逐出《公约》的国家(俄罗斯)和一个仍然是《公约》成员的国家(波兰)之后,我们建议将 "推回 "和 "反弹 "之间的概念二元对立打开,形成一个动态的连续体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Politics
Russian Politics Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Non-execution of Strasbourg Judgments against Russia: the Case for a Trust Fund Resisting Strasbourg to Reassure Moscow: the Recent Story of the Russian Constitutional Court Pushback or Backlash against the European Court of Human Rights? Authoritarian Sovereignization: Russia’s Way out of the Council of Europe Conservative Jurisprudence and Russia’s Response to ECtHR Judgements on Cases of Domestic Violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1