Quality of life of patients with an advanced stage of proliferative diabetic retinopathy after application of various vitrectomy technologies

A. F. Teshev, A. V. Malyshev
{"title":"Quality of life of patients with an advanced stage of proliferative diabetic retinopathy after application of various vitrectomy technologies","authors":"A. F. Teshev, A. V. Malyshev","doi":"10.21516/2072-0076-2024-17-1-68-73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: A comparative assessment of quality of life (QL) after the use of various vitrectomy (VE) technologies in patients with an advanced stage of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (ASPDR).Material and methods. We examined 132 patients aged 42 to 76 (average age 62.8 ± 2.4 years) who met the classification criteria of ASPDR: impossibility to estimate the area of neovascularization; the fundus of the eye in the posterior pole cannot be seen or can only partialy be seen using an ophthalmoscope; evidence of preretinal or vitreal hemorrhage in the posterior pole with an area of more than 4 optic discs and retinoschisis in the macular zone. All patients were divided into two groups, comparable in age, gender and visual status of the “healthy” eye: the main group (69 eyes), in which VE was performed according to the technique developed by the authors, and the control (63 eyes), in which the traditional VE technique was used. QL was assessed before surgery and 3 months after it using the VFQ-25 and QL-20 questionnaires.Results. QL was found to be higher when the new surgery technique was used: the data of VFA-25 showed a 12.9% increase (p < 0.05) and QL-20 showed a 29.2% increase (p < 0.01), which points to a higher clinical effectiveness of the newly developed surgical treatment technique than that of the traditional technique.Conclusion. The results obtained are related to the ophthalmological features of the developed surgical treatment of ASPDR: combined (phacoemulsification of cataracts + IOL + vitrectomy) one-stage intervention, lack of drainage of subretinal fluid, etc.), medication support (preliminary intravitreal administration of an angiogenesis inhibitor) and anesthesia (intervention under local anesthesia with intravenous sedation). The differences are most effectively identified using the special QL-20 questionnaire.","PeriodicalId":21436,"journal":{"name":"Russian Ophthalmological Journal","volume":" 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Ophthalmological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2024-17-1-68-73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A comparative assessment of quality of life (QL) after the use of various vitrectomy (VE) technologies in patients with an advanced stage of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (ASPDR).Material and methods. We examined 132 patients aged 42 to 76 (average age 62.8 ± 2.4 years) who met the classification criteria of ASPDR: impossibility to estimate the area of neovascularization; the fundus of the eye in the posterior pole cannot be seen or can only partialy be seen using an ophthalmoscope; evidence of preretinal or vitreal hemorrhage in the posterior pole with an area of more than 4 optic discs and retinoschisis in the macular zone. All patients were divided into two groups, comparable in age, gender and visual status of the “healthy” eye: the main group (69 eyes), in which VE was performed according to the technique developed by the authors, and the control (63 eyes), in which the traditional VE technique was used. QL was assessed before surgery and 3 months after it using the VFQ-25 and QL-20 questionnaires.Results. QL was found to be higher when the new surgery technique was used: the data of VFA-25 showed a 12.9% increase (p < 0.05) and QL-20 showed a 29.2% increase (p < 0.01), which points to a higher clinical effectiveness of the newly developed surgical treatment technique than that of the traditional technique.Conclusion. The results obtained are related to the ophthalmological features of the developed surgical treatment of ASPDR: combined (phacoemulsification of cataracts + IOL + vitrectomy) one-stage intervention, lack of drainage of subretinal fluid, etc.), medication support (preliminary intravitreal administration of an angiogenesis inhibitor) and anesthesia (intervention under local anesthesia with intravenous sedation). The differences are most effectively identified using the special QL-20 questionnaire.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用各种玻璃体切割技术后增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变晚期患者的生活质量
目的:对增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(ASPDR)晚期患者使用各种玻璃体切割(VE)技术后的生活质量(QL)进行比较评估。我们对 132 名年龄在 42 岁至 76 岁(平均年龄为 62.8 ± 2.4 岁)的患者进行了检查,这些患者均符合 ASPDR 的分类标准:无法估计新生血管的面积;使用眼底镜无法看到或只能部分看到后极部的眼底;有证据表明后极部有视盘前出血或玻璃体出血,且出血面积超过 4 个视盘,黄斑区有视网膜裂孔。所有患者被分为年龄、性别和 "健康 "眼视力状况相当的两组:主组(69 眼)和对照组(63 眼),前者根据作者开发的技术进行 VE,后者则使用传统的 VE 技术。术前和术后 3 个月使用 VFQ-25 和 QL-20 问卷对患者的生活质量进行评估。结果发现,使用新手术技术时,QL更高:VFA-25数据显示提高了12.9%(P < 0.05),QL-20显示提高了29.2%(P < 0.01),这表明新开发的手术治疗技术的临床疗效高于传统技术。所获得的结果与所开发的 ASPDR 手术治疗方法的眼科特点有关:联合(白内障超声乳化+人工晶体+玻璃体切割)一步介入、不引流视网膜下积液等)、药物支持(初步在玻璃体内注射血管生成抑制剂)和麻醉(在局部麻醉和静脉镇静的情况下介入)。使用特殊的 QL-20 问卷可以最有效地确定这些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Endothelial keratoplasty in integrity-damaged iridolenticular diaphragm Scleral collagen crosslinking as a promising direction of sclera-strengthening treatment of progressive myopia Is microbiota a factor in the mechanism of glaucoma development? The effect of silicone oil on the anatomical and functional parameters of the retina during surgery of regmatogenic retinal detachment In memoriam of Abdul-Hamid Davudovich Aliyev
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1