Analysis of single umbilical artery with concurrent congenital anomaly: Is it a risk factor for poor prognosis? A cross-sectional study

N. Lee, Hee Joung Choi
{"title":"Analysis of single umbilical artery with concurrent congenital anomaly: Is it a risk factor for poor prognosis? A cross-sectional study","authors":"N. Lee, Hee Joung Choi","doi":"10.18502/ijrm.v22i2.15710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A single umbilical artery (SUA) may coexist with a single anomaly or multiple congenital anomalies. Although anomalies associated with SUA can primarily cause high perinatal mortality, their clinical significance has not been evaluated. \nObjective: We investigated the relationship between the clinical features and the type or number of concurrent anomalies in neonates with SUA. \nMaterials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 104 neonates with SUA were enrolled from January 2000- to December 2020 at Dongsan hospital, Daegu, South Korea. Data on the maternal history and the neonates demographic characteristics, clinical course, chromosomal analysis, and congenital anomalies, were collected. \nResults: Among the neonates with SUA included, 77 (74.0%) had one or more congenital anomalies; 66 (63.5%) were cardiac, 20 (19.2%) were genitourinary, 12 (11.5%) were gastrointestinal, 5 (4.8%) were central nervous system, 12 (11.5%) were skeletal, and 5 (4.8%) were facial anomalies. The number of concurrent anomalies ranged from 0–4. Neonates with SUA and concurrent gastrointestinal anomaly had a high incidence of initial positive ventilation, intubation, and inotropic drug use and lower Apgar score at 1 min and 5 min. 7 (6.7%) neonates with SUA died. Low birth weight (odds ratio = 6.16, p = 0.05), maternal multiparity (2.41, p = 0.13), gastrointestinal anomaly (5.06, p = 0.11), and initial cardiac resuscitation (7.77, p = 0.11) were risk factors for mortality in neonates with SUA. \nConclusion: Neonates with SUA and concurrent gastrointestinal anomaly, low birth weight, maternal multiparity, and initial cardiac resuscitation had poor outcomes. \nKey words: Single umbilical artery, Congenital abnormalities, Perinatal mortality.","PeriodicalId":318611,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine (IJRM)","volume":" 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine (IJRM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v22i2.15710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A single umbilical artery (SUA) may coexist with a single anomaly or multiple congenital anomalies. Although anomalies associated with SUA can primarily cause high perinatal mortality, their clinical significance has not been evaluated. Objective: We investigated the relationship between the clinical features and the type or number of concurrent anomalies in neonates with SUA. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 104 neonates with SUA were enrolled from January 2000- to December 2020 at Dongsan hospital, Daegu, South Korea. Data on the maternal history and the neonates demographic characteristics, clinical course, chromosomal analysis, and congenital anomalies, were collected. Results: Among the neonates with SUA included, 77 (74.0%) had one or more congenital anomalies; 66 (63.5%) were cardiac, 20 (19.2%) were genitourinary, 12 (11.5%) were gastrointestinal, 5 (4.8%) were central nervous system, 12 (11.5%) were skeletal, and 5 (4.8%) were facial anomalies. The number of concurrent anomalies ranged from 0–4. Neonates with SUA and concurrent gastrointestinal anomaly had a high incidence of initial positive ventilation, intubation, and inotropic drug use and lower Apgar score at 1 min and 5 min. 7 (6.7%) neonates with SUA died. Low birth weight (odds ratio = 6.16, p = 0.05), maternal multiparity (2.41, p = 0.13), gastrointestinal anomaly (5.06, p = 0.11), and initial cardiac resuscitation (7.77, p = 0.11) were risk factors for mortality in neonates with SUA. Conclusion: Neonates with SUA and concurrent gastrointestinal anomaly, low birth weight, maternal multiparity, and initial cardiac resuscitation had poor outcomes. Key words: Single umbilical artery, Congenital abnormalities, Perinatal mortality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单脐动脉并发先天性畸形分析:它是预后不良的风险因素吗?一项横断面研究
背景:单脐动脉(SUA)可能与单个异常或多个先天性异常并存。虽然与 SUA 相关的畸形主要会导致较高的围产期死亡率,但其临床意义尚未得到评估。研究目的我们研究了患有 SUA 的新生儿的临床特征与并发畸形的类型或数量之间的关系。材料和方法:在这项横断面研究中,2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,韩国大邱东山医院共收治了 104 例 SUA 新生儿。研究收集了母体病史、新生儿人口学特征、临床过程、染色体分析和先天性畸形等方面的数据。结果77例(74.0%)患有一种或多种先天性畸形,其中66例(63.5%)为心脏畸形,20例(19.2%)为泌尿生殖系统畸形,12例(11.5%)为胃肠道畸形,5例(4.8%)为中枢神经系统畸形,12例(11.5%)为骨骼畸形,5例(4.8%)为面部畸形。并发畸形的数量为 0-4 例。患有 SUA 并同时患有胃肠道畸形的新生儿初始正压通气、插管和肌力药物使用率较高,1 分钟和 5 分钟的 Apgar 评分较低。低出生体重(几率比=6.16,P=0.05)、产妇多胎性(2.41,P=0.13)、胃肠道异常(5.06,P=0.11)和初始心脏复苏(7.77,P=0.11)是SUA新生儿死亡的风险因素。结论患有 SUA 并同时患有胃肠道畸形、低出生体重、多胎妊娠和初次心脏复苏的新生儿预后较差。关键字单脐动脉 先天性畸形 围产儿死亡率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tubal ectopic molar pregnancy: A case report Short-term effects of antenatal betamethasone on fetal cardiovascular and circulation status: A quasi-experimental observational (before-after) study Successful management of pregnancy in Turner syndrome (Monosomy X): A rare condition-based learning experience from Vietnam A new look at the theoretical causes of endometriosis: Narrative review Altered expression of kisspeptin, dynorphin, and related neuropeptides in polycystic ovary syndrome: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1