Potential of intraductal contact lithotripsy with oral cholangioscopy in the treatment of ”complex” choledocholithiasis

S. Budzinsky, M. Anishchenko, S. Shapovalyants, E. A. Vorobyova, E. N. Platonova, E. D. Fedorov, A. S. Melnikova
{"title":"Potential of intraductal contact lithotripsy with oral cholangioscopy in the treatment of ”complex” choledocholithiasis","authors":"S. Budzinsky, M. Anishchenko, S. Shapovalyants, E. A. Vorobyova, E. N. Platonova, E. D. Fedorov, A. S. Melnikova","doi":"10.16931/1995-5464.2024-1-30-38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"   Aim. To evaluate the efficacy of various methods of intraductal contact lithotripsy in “complex” choledocholithiasis.   Materials and methods. From January 2018 to July 2023, 40 patients underwent intraductal contact lithotripsy with oral transpapillary cholangioscopy. Indications for the procedure included failure of mechanical lithotripsy in large choledocholithiasis in 37 patients (92.5 %), impaction of the gallstone during conventional lithoextraction, narrow pancreatic part of common bile duct, intrahepatic localization of gallstones. Contact electrohydraulic lithotripsy was performed in 10 patients (25 %), laser fragmentation by holmium laser in 15 patients (37.5 %), and new thuliumlaser – in 15 patients (37.5 %).   Results. The overall efficacy of contact lithotripsy methods comprised 90%. Laser methods demonstrated comparable results: the overall success rate of lithotripsy with holmium laser accounted for 93.3 %, and with thulium laser – 90 %. Complete sanitation after the first intervention with holmium lithotripsy was achieved in 92.9 % of patients, with thulium laser – in 88.9 %. The efficacy of electrohydraulic lithotripsy was lower: the overall success rate comprised86.7 %, and the success rate after the first procedure accounted for 61.5 % of patients. The average number of interventions required to achieve complete sanitation of the bile ducts amounted to 1.07 for holmium laser lithotripsy,1.1 for thulium laser, and 1.6 for electrohydraulic lithotripsy. In 1 case (2.5 %), perforation of the wall of the common bile duct was noted during the extraction of stone fragments. The complication was corrected during retrograde intervention. No fatal outcomes reported.   Conclusion. Intraductal contact lithotripsy proved to be highly effective and safe. Laser methods demonstrate certain advantages over electrohydraulic lithotripsy.","PeriodicalId":505469,"journal":{"name":"Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery","volume":" 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2024-1-30-38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

   Aim. To evaluate the efficacy of various methods of intraductal contact lithotripsy in “complex” choledocholithiasis.   Materials and methods. From January 2018 to July 2023, 40 patients underwent intraductal contact lithotripsy with oral transpapillary cholangioscopy. Indications for the procedure included failure of mechanical lithotripsy in large choledocholithiasis in 37 patients (92.5 %), impaction of the gallstone during conventional lithoextraction, narrow pancreatic part of common bile duct, intrahepatic localization of gallstones. Contact electrohydraulic lithotripsy was performed in 10 patients (25 %), laser fragmentation by holmium laser in 15 patients (37.5 %), and new thuliumlaser – in 15 patients (37.5 %).   Results. The overall efficacy of contact lithotripsy methods comprised 90%. Laser methods demonstrated comparable results: the overall success rate of lithotripsy with holmium laser accounted for 93.3 %, and with thulium laser – 90 %. Complete sanitation after the first intervention with holmium lithotripsy was achieved in 92.9 % of patients, with thulium laser – in 88.9 %. The efficacy of electrohydraulic lithotripsy was lower: the overall success rate comprised86.7 %, and the success rate after the first procedure accounted for 61.5 % of patients. The average number of interventions required to achieve complete sanitation of the bile ducts amounted to 1.07 for holmium laser lithotripsy,1.1 for thulium laser, and 1.6 for electrohydraulic lithotripsy. In 1 case (2.5 %), perforation of the wall of the common bile duct was noted during the extraction of stone fragments. The complication was corrected during retrograde intervention. No fatal outcomes reported.   Conclusion. Intraductal contact lithotripsy proved to be highly effective and safe. Laser methods demonstrate certain advantages over electrohydraulic lithotripsy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导管内接触碎石术配合口腔胆道镜治疗 "复杂 "胆总管结石的潜力
目的评估各种导管内接触碎石方法对 "复杂 "胆总管结石的疗效。 材料与方法。从 2018 年 1 月到 2023 年 7 月,40 名患者接受了导管内接触性碎石术,并进行了口腔经皮胆道镜检查。手术指征包括37例(92.5%)大胆管结石机械碎石失败、常规碎石过程中胆石嵌顿、胆总管胰腺部分狭窄、胆结石肝内定位。10 名患者(25%)接受了接触式电液碎石术,15 名患者(37.5%)接受了钬激光碎石术,15 名患者(37.5%)接受了新型铥激光碎石术。 结果显示接触式碎石方法的总有效率为 90%。激光方法的效果相当:钬激光碎石的总体成功率为 93.3%,铥激光为 90%。92.9%的患者在首次使用钬激光碎石后实现了完全清洁,88.9%的患者在使用铥激光碎石后实现了完全清洁。电液碎石的疗效较低:总体成功率为86.7%,首次手术后成功率为61.5%。钬激光碎石术、铥激光碎石术和电液碎石术的成功率分别为1.07%、1.1%和1.6%。有 1 例患者(2.5%)在取出结石碎片时发现胆总管壁穿孔。这一并发症在逆行介入治疗中得到了纠正。无死亡病例报告。 结论事实证明,导管内接触式碎石术非常有效和安全。与电液碎石法相比,激光碎石法具有一定优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laser lithotripsy for pancreatic duct stones Long-term outcomes of combined treatment of primary resectable pancreatic head cancer in patients over 70 years Endoscopic classification of major duodenal papilla adenomas Assessment of quality of life in patients after surgery for pancreatic and periampullary malignancies. Systematic review Features of laparoscopic liver resection training after mastering of robot-assisted technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1