Challenge‐based learning implementation in engineering education: A systematic literature review

K. Doulougeri, J. Vermunt, G. Bombaerts, Michael Bots
{"title":"Challenge‐based learning implementation in engineering education: A systematic literature review","authors":"K. Doulougeri, J. Vermunt, G. Bombaerts, Michael Bots","doi":"10.1002/jee.20588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Challenge‐based learning (CBL) is a pedagogical approach increasingly adopted in engineering education. Despite its growing practice, there is little consensus in the literature about how CBL is implemented in engineering curricula and what experiences teachers and students have in relation to it.To address this gap, the following research questions guided the study: How is CBL currently implemented in engineering education? What difficulties and lessons learned are associated with the implementation of CBL?We systematically reviewed the empirical literature published between 2010 and 2021. Forty‐eight empirical studies describing CBL implementation were analyzed using the curricular spider‐web framework.The review shows the variation in CBL implementation at the course and project levels. CBL courses and projects shared the use of open‐ended, real‐world challenges as a starting point for student learning. However, they differed in the embeddedness of a challenge in specific courses and the focus of the learning, which ranged across knowledge acquisition, knowledge application, and development of transversal skills. CBL experiences also varied in terms of challenge characteristics, such as the link with global societal challenges, stakeholders' involvement, and multidisciplinarity. Similar difficulties and lessons learned were reported by teachers and students across the different examples of CBL implementation.CBL as a pedagogical approach in engineering education can promote student engagement with complex societal challenges within a real‐world context. However, there are limitations to the review and implications of the findings for educational research and practice.","PeriodicalId":507669,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Challenge‐based learning (CBL) is a pedagogical approach increasingly adopted in engineering education. Despite its growing practice, there is little consensus in the literature about how CBL is implemented in engineering curricula and what experiences teachers and students have in relation to it.To address this gap, the following research questions guided the study: How is CBL currently implemented in engineering education? What difficulties and lessons learned are associated with the implementation of CBL?We systematically reviewed the empirical literature published between 2010 and 2021. Forty‐eight empirical studies describing CBL implementation were analyzed using the curricular spider‐web framework.The review shows the variation in CBL implementation at the course and project levels. CBL courses and projects shared the use of open‐ended, real‐world challenges as a starting point for student learning. However, they differed in the embeddedness of a challenge in specific courses and the focus of the learning, which ranged across knowledge acquisition, knowledge application, and development of transversal skills. CBL experiences also varied in terms of challenge characteristics, such as the link with global societal challenges, stakeholders' involvement, and multidisciplinarity. Similar difficulties and lessons learned were reported by teachers and students across the different examples of CBL implementation.CBL as a pedagogical approach in engineering education can promote student engagement with complex societal challenges within a real‐world context. However, there are limitations to the review and implications of the findings for educational research and practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在工程教育中实施基于挑战的学习:系统文献综述
基于挑战的学习(CBL)是工程教育中越来越多采用的一种教学方法。尽管其实践越来越多,但关于 CBL 如何在工程学课程中实施以及教师和学生的相关经验,文献中几乎没有共识:目前在工程学教育中是如何实施 CBL 的?与实施 CBL 相关的困难和经验教训有哪些?我们系统地回顾了 2010 年至 2021 年间发表的实证文献。我们使用课程蛛网框架分析了 48 项描述 CBL 实施情况的实证研究。CBL 课程和项目共同使用开放式的真实世界挑战作为学生学习的起点。然而,它们在将挑战嵌入具体课程和学习重点方面有所不同,学习重点包括知识获取、知识应用和横向技能发展。CBL 经验在挑战的特点方面也各不相同,如与全球社会挑战的联系、利益相关者的参与和多学科性。在实施 CBL 的不同实例中,教师和学生都报告了类似的困难和经验教训。CBL 作为工程教育的一种教学方法,可以促进学生在真实世界背景下参与应对复杂的社会挑战。然而,这项研究的局限性以及研究结果对教育研究和实践的影响也是存在的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
(Mis)alignments between postdoctoral and supervisors' perceptions of mentorship competencies in engineering and computer science Exploring experiences that foster recognition in engineering across race and gender Challenge‐based learning implementation in engineering education: A systematic literature review Achievement goal theory in STEM education: A systematic review What engineering employers want: An analysis of technical and professional skills in engineering job advertisements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1