An evaluation of the outcomes associated with peritoneal catheter use in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery: A multicenter study

David M. Kwiatkowski MD, MS , Jeffrey A. Alten MD , Kenneth E. Mah MD , David T. Selewski MD , Tia T. Raymond MD, MBA , Natasha S. Afonso MD, MPH , Joshua J. Blinder MD , Matthew T. Coghill MD , David S. Cooper MD, MPH , Joshua D. Koch MD , Catherine D. Krawczeski MD , David L.S. Morales MD , Tara M. Neumayr MD , A.K.M. Fazlur Rahman PhD , Garrett Reichle MS , Sarah Tabbutt MD, PhD , Tennille N. Webb MD , Santiago Borasino MD
{"title":"An evaluation of the outcomes associated with peritoneal catheter use in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery: A multicenter study","authors":"David M. Kwiatkowski MD, MS ,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Alten MD ,&nbsp;Kenneth E. Mah MD ,&nbsp;David T. Selewski MD ,&nbsp;Tia T. Raymond MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Natasha S. Afonso MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Joshua J. Blinder MD ,&nbsp;Matthew T. Coghill MD ,&nbsp;David S. Cooper MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Joshua D. Koch MD ,&nbsp;Catherine D. Krawczeski MD ,&nbsp;David L.S. Morales MD ,&nbsp;Tara M. Neumayr MD ,&nbsp;A.K.M. Fazlur Rahman PhD ,&nbsp;Garrett Reichle MS ,&nbsp;Sarah Tabbutt MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tennille N. Webb MD ,&nbsp;Santiago Borasino MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The study objective was to determine if intraoperative peritoneal catheter placement is associated with improved outcomes in neonates undergoing high-risk cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This propensity score–matched retrospective study used data from 22 academic pediatric cardiac intensive care units. Consecutive neonates undergoing Society of Thoracic Surgeons–European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery category 3 to 5 cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass at centers participating in the NEonatal and Pediatric Heart Renal Outcomes Network collaborative were studied to determine the association of the use of an intraoperative placed peritoneal catheter for dialysis or passive drainage with clinical outcomes, including the duration of mechanical ventilation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 1490 eligible neonates in the NEonatal and Pediatric Heart Renal Outcomes Network dataset, a propensity-matched analysis was used to compare 395 patients with peritoneal catheter placement with 628 patients without peritoneal catheter placement. Time to extubation and most clinical outcomes were similar. Postoperative length of stay was 5 days longer in the peritoneal catheter placement cohort (17 vs 22 days, <em>P</em> = .001). There was a 50% higher incidence of moderate to severe acute kidney injury in the no-peritoneal catheter cohort (12% vs 18%, <em>P</em> = .02). Subgroup analyses between specific treatments and in highest risk patients yielded similar associations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study does not demonstrate improved outcomes among neonates with placement of a peritoneal catheter during cardiac surgery. Outcomes were similar apart from longer hospital stay in the peritoneal catheter cohort. The no-peritoneal catheter cohort had a 50% higher incidence of moderate to severe acute kidney injury (12% vs 18%). This analysis does not support indiscriminate peritoneal catheter use, although it may support the utility for postoperative fluid removal among neonates at risk for acute kidney injury. A multicenter controlled trial may better elucidate peritoneal catheter effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"19 ","pages":"Pages 275-295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624000688/pdfft?md5=c36f936319a101fe5d6c4b4f8d96cfa9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666273624000688-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624000688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The study objective was to determine if intraoperative peritoneal catheter placement is associated with improved outcomes in neonates undergoing high-risk cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Methods

This propensity score–matched retrospective study used data from 22 academic pediatric cardiac intensive care units. Consecutive neonates undergoing Society of Thoracic Surgeons–European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery category 3 to 5 cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass at centers participating in the NEonatal and Pediatric Heart Renal Outcomes Network collaborative were studied to determine the association of the use of an intraoperative placed peritoneal catheter for dialysis or passive drainage with clinical outcomes, including the duration of mechanical ventilation.

Results

Among 1490 eligible neonates in the NEonatal and Pediatric Heart Renal Outcomes Network dataset, a propensity-matched analysis was used to compare 395 patients with peritoneal catheter placement with 628 patients without peritoneal catheter placement. Time to extubation and most clinical outcomes were similar. Postoperative length of stay was 5 days longer in the peritoneal catheter placement cohort (17 vs 22 days, P = .001). There was a 50% higher incidence of moderate to severe acute kidney injury in the no-peritoneal catheter cohort (12% vs 18%, P = .02). Subgroup analyses between specific treatments and in highest risk patients yielded similar associations.

Conclusions

This study does not demonstrate improved outcomes among neonates with placement of a peritoneal catheter during cardiac surgery. Outcomes were similar apart from longer hospital stay in the peritoneal catheter cohort. The no-peritoneal catheter cohort had a 50% higher incidence of moderate to severe acute kidney injury (12% vs 18%). This analysis does not support indiscriminate peritoneal catheter use, although it may support the utility for postoperative fluid removal among neonates at risk for acute kidney injury. A multicenter controlled trial may better elucidate peritoneal catheter effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对接受心脏手术的新生儿使用腹膜导管的相关结果进行评估:一项多中心研究
研究目的是确定术中腹腔导管置入是否与接受心肺旁路高风险心脏手术的新生儿预后改善有关。方法这项倾向评分匹配回顾性研究使用了来自 22 家学术性儿科心脏重症监护病房的数据。在参与东北产科和儿科心脏肾脏结果网络合作研究的中心,连续有新生儿接受胸外科医师协会-欧洲心胸外科学会 3-5 类心脏手术并进行心肺旁路手术,研究旨在确定术中放置腹膜透析导管或被动引流导管与临床结果(包括机械通气持续时间)之间的关系。结果在东北产科和儿科心脏肾脏结果网络数据集中的1490名符合条件的新生儿中,采用倾向匹配分析比较了395名置入腹膜导管的患者和628名未置入腹膜导管的患者。拔管时间和大多数临床结果相似。腹腔导管置入组患者的术后住院时间延长了 5 天(17 天 vs 22 天,P = .001)。未放置腹膜导管队列中中度至重度急性肾损伤的发生率比放置腹膜导管队列高 50%(12% 对 18%,P = .02)。对特定治疗方法和高风险患者进行亚组分析,也得出了类似的结论。腹腔导管组除了住院时间较长之外,其他结果相似。未使用腹膜导管组的中重度急性肾损伤发生率高出 50%(12% 对 18%)。这项分析并不支持不加选择地使用腹腔导管,不过它可能支持在有急性肾损伤风险的新生儿术后排液时使用腹腔导管。多中心对照试验可更好地阐明腹膜导管的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Repair of acute type A aortic dissection: The simplest solution is not always the best Are there etiology-specific risk factors for adverse outcomes in patients on Impella 5.5 support? Type B aortic dissection in Marfan patients after the David procedure: Insights from patient-specific simulation Reoperation after aortic root replacement and its impact on long-term survival Should we wait until the morning?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1