Assessing the OPRA trial for surgical oncologists: Safety and feasibility of a total neoadjuvant therapy approach in patients with rectal cancer

Wini Zambare , Joao Miranda , Natally Horvat , J. Joshua Smith
{"title":"Assessing the OPRA trial for surgical oncologists: Safety and feasibility of a total neoadjuvant therapy approach in patients with rectal cancer","authors":"Wini Zambare ,&nbsp;Joao Miranda ,&nbsp;Natally Horvat ,&nbsp;J. Joshua Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Organ Preservation in patients with Rectal Adenocarcinoma (OPRA) trial is a randomized, non-blinded, phase II prospective study that investigated total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and a selective “watch-and-wait” (WW) approach in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). It compared two TNT regimens: induction chemotherapy-chemoradiotherapy (INCT-CRT) and chemoradiotherapy-consolidation chemotherapy (CRT-CNCT). Depending on tumor response, patients were offered WW or surgery. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), hypothesizing that patients who underwent TNT with selective WW would have improved DFS compared to historical rates. Secondary endpoints included organ preservation (OP) and overall survival, hypothesizing that differences between INCT-CRT and CRT-CNCT could indicate a superior regimen. Results demonstrated treatment of LARC with TNT and selective WW allows for OP in approximately half of patients without negatively impacting oncologic outcomes such as DFS. The data show that a CRT-CNCT regimen had higher rates of OP, lower rates of tumor regrowth, and similar DFS compared to INCT-CRT. Lastly, DFS does not differ between patients who undergo immediate TME versus TME after regrowth. Thus, patients treated with TNT who achieve a clinical complete response (cCR) can safely undergo WW with the potential for OP. Current research to improve TNT and enhance cCR will expand the utility of the WW approach, including the intensification of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Janus trial), comparing short-course and long-course CRT prior to CNCT (ENSEMBLE and German trials), utilizing fluoropyrimidine-chemotherapy with and without oxaliplatin in the context of WW (CHOW trial), and exploring less invasive operative approaches for early-stage tumors (NEO and NEO-RT trials).</p></div><div><h3>Synopsis</h3><p>The OPRA trial demonstrates treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer using total neoadjuvant therapy with selective “watch-and-wait” allows organ preservation in approximately half of patients without negatively impacting oncologic outcomes. For widespread adoption of “watch-and-wait”, data from accruing prospective trials are needed to demonstrate its viability across diverse clinical settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000525/pdfft?md5=31a05d5057285e38e3e37e8b6861776d&pid=1-s2.0-S2950247024000525-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology Insight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Organ Preservation in patients with Rectal Adenocarcinoma (OPRA) trial is a randomized, non-blinded, phase II prospective study that investigated total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and a selective “watch-and-wait” (WW) approach in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). It compared two TNT regimens: induction chemotherapy-chemoradiotherapy (INCT-CRT) and chemoradiotherapy-consolidation chemotherapy (CRT-CNCT). Depending on tumor response, patients were offered WW or surgery. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), hypothesizing that patients who underwent TNT with selective WW would have improved DFS compared to historical rates. Secondary endpoints included organ preservation (OP) and overall survival, hypothesizing that differences between INCT-CRT and CRT-CNCT could indicate a superior regimen. Results demonstrated treatment of LARC with TNT and selective WW allows for OP in approximately half of patients without negatively impacting oncologic outcomes such as DFS. The data show that a CRT-CNCT regimen had higher rates of OP, lower rates of tumor regrowth, and similar DFS compared to INCT-CRT. Lastly, DFS does not differ between patients who undergo immediate TME versus TME after regrowth. Thus, patients treated with TNT who achieve a clinical complete response (cCR) can safely undergo WW with the potential for OP. Current research to improve TNT and enhance cCR will expand the utility of the WW approach, including the intensification of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Janus trial), comparing short-course and long-course CRT prior to CNCT (ENSEMBLE and German trials), utilizing fluoropyrimidine-chemotherapy with and without oxaliplatin in the context of WW (CHOW trial), and exploring less invasive operative approaches for early-stage tumors (NEO and NEO-RT trials).

Synopsis

The OPRA trial demonstrates treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer using total neoadjuvant therapy with selective “watch-and-wait” allows organ preservation in approximately half of patients without negatively impacting oncologic outcomes. For widespread adoption of “watch-and-wait”, data from accruing prospective trials are needed to demonstrate its viability across diverse clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为肿瘤外科医生评估 OPRA 试验:直肠癌患者全面新辅助治疗方法的安全性和可行性
直肠腺癌患者的器官保护(OPRA)试验是一项随机、非盲法的 II 期前瞻性研究,该研究调查了局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)的全新辅助治疗(TNT)和选择性 "观察-等待"(WW)方法。该研究比较了两种 TNT 方案:诱导化疗-化放疗(INCT-CRT)和化放疗-巩固化疗(CRT-CNCT)。根据肿瘤反应,患者可接受WW或手术治疗。主要终点是无病生存期(DFS),假设接受TNT治疗并选择性接受WW治疗的患者的无病生存期将比以往有所改善。次要终点包括器官保存(OP)和总生存期,假设INCT-CRT和CRT-CNCT之间的差异可能表明治疗方案更优。结果表明,用 TNT 和选择性 WW 治疗 LARC 可使大约一半的患者获得 OP,而不会对 DFS 等肿瘤结果产生负面影响。数据显示,与 INCT-CRT 相比,CRT-CNCT 方案的 OP 率更高,肿瘤生长率更低,DFS 相似。最后,立即接受 TME 与肿瘤生长后接受 TME 的患者的 DFS 没有差异。因此,接受 TNT 治疗并获得临床完全反应(cCR)的患者可以安全地接受 WW 治疗,并有可能获得 OP。目前旨在改善 TNT 和提高 cCR 的研究将扩大 WW 方法的应用范围,包括加强新辅助化疗(Janus 试验)、比较 CNCT 前的短程和长程 CRT(ENSEMBLE 和德国试验)、在 WW 中使用氟嘧啶化疗联合或不联合奥沙利铂(CHOW 试验),以及探索早期肿瘤的微创手术方法(NEO 和 NEO-RT 试验)。简介 OPRA 试验表明,采用选择性 "观察-等待 "新辅助疗法治疗局部晚期直肠癌可保留约半数患者的器官,而不会对肿瘤治疗效果产生负面影响。要想广泛采用 "观察-等待 "疗法,需要从正在进行的前瞻性试验中获得数据,以证明其在不同临床环境中的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combining liver-directed and immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A review and future directions Timing of breast biopsy and axillary ultrasound does not affect the false positive rate of the axillary ultrasound Small bowel cancers: A population-based analysis of epidemiology, treatment and outcomes in Ontario, Canada from 2005-2020 Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Prehabilitation (PrePFPT) for the prevention of low anterior resection syndrome Pepsinogen and Helicobacter pylori: Serum biomarkers for gastric cancer risk in a diverse United States population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1