Resultados durante la curva de aprendizaje de la exploración laparoscópica de la vía biliar por coledocolitiasis

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Cirugia Espanola Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ciresp.2024.02.004
Marina Vila Tura , Ana Maria Ciscar Bellés , Ainoa Benavides dos Santos , Iva Borisova , Neus Torra , Ernest Bombuy , Sandra López Gordo
{"title":"Resultados durante la curva de aprendizaje de la exploración laparoscópica de la vía biliar por coledocolitiasis","authors":"Marina Vila Tura ,&nbsp;Ana Maria Ciscar Bellés ,&nbsp;Ainoa Benavides dos Santos ,&nbsp;Iva Borisova ,&nbsp;Neus Torra ,&nbsp;Ernest Bombuy ,&nbsp;Sandra López Gordo","doi":"10.1016/j.ciresp.2024.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To analyze the results obtained in terms of efficacy and safety during the learning curve of a surgical team in the technique of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with cholecystectomy (LCBDE<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->LC) using choledochoscopy for the treatment of patients with cholelithiasis and choledocolithiasis (CLD).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Single-center prospective analysis of patients treated with LCBDE<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->LC during the first 4 years of implementation of the technique. A descriptive and comparative analysis was carried out between groups according to the transcystic (TCi) or transcolecocal (TCo) approach, and also evolutionary by periods. The effectiveness of the technique was evaluated using the variable <em>success rate</em> and safety through the analysis of the <em>overall complication rate</em> and the <em>bile leak rate</em> as the most frequent adverse effect.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 78 patients were analyzed. The most frequent approach was TCo (62%). The overall success rate was 92%. The TCi group had a shorter operating time, a lower overall complications rate and a shorter hospital stay. The TCo approach was related to a higher rate of clinically relevant bile leak (8%). Complex cases increased significantly during the learning curve without effect on the overall results.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>LCBDE<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->CL is an effective and safe technique during the learning curve. Its results are comparable to those published by more experienced groups and do not present significant differences related to the evolution during learning period.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50690,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Espanola","volume":"102 5","pages":"Pages 257-264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009739X2400054X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To analyze the results obtained in terms of efficacy and safety during the learning curve of a surgical team in the technique of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with cholecystectomy (LCBDE + LC) using choledochoscopy for the treatment of patients with cholelithiasis and choledocolithiasis (CLD).

Methods

Single-center prospective analysis of patients treated with LCBDE + LC during the first 4 years of implementation of the technique. A descriptive and comparative analysis was carried out between groups according to the transcystic (TCi) or transcolecocal (TCo) approach, and also evolutionary by periods. The effectiveness of the technique was evaluated using the variable success rate and safety through the analysis of the overall complication rate and the bile leak rate as the most frequent adverse effect.

Results

A total of 78 patients were analyzed. The most frequent approach was TCo (62%). The overall success rate was 92%. The TCi group had a shorter operating time, a lower overall complications rate and a shorter hospital stay. The TCo approach was related to a higher rate of clinically relevant bile leak (8%). Complex cases increased significantly during the learning curve without effect on the overall results.

Conclusions

LCBDE + CL is an effective and safe technique during the learning curve. Its results are comparable to those published by more experienced groups and do not present significant differences related to the evolution during learning period.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜胆总管探查术治疗胆总管结石学习曲线期间的成果
方法对采用腹腔镜胆总管探查+胆囊切除术(LCBDE + LC)治疗胆石症和胆总管结石(CLD)患者的外科团队在学习曲线期间获得的疗效和安全性进行单中心前瞻性分析。根据经膀胱(TCi)或经胆囊(TCo)的方法对不同组别进行描述性比较分析,并按时期进行演变。通过可变成功率评估了该技术的有效性,并通过分析总体并发症发生率和最常见的不良反应胆漏率评估了该技术的安全性。最常见的方法是 TCo(62%)。总成功率为 92%。TCi组的手术时间更短、总并发症发生率更低、住院时间更短。TCo方法与临床相关的胆漏发生率较高(8%)有关。在学习曲线期间,复杂病例明显增加,但对总体结果没有影响。在学习曲线期间,LCBDE + CL 是一种有效且安全的技术,其结果与经验更丰富的团体所发表的结果相当,并且与学习期间的演变没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cirugia Espanola
Cirugia Espanola SURGERY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
21.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Cirugía Española, an official body of the Asociación Española de Cirujanos (Spanish Association of Surgeons), will consider original articles, reviews, editorials, special articles, scientific letters, letters to the editor, and medical images for publication; all of these will be submitted to an anonymous external peer review process. There is also the possibility of accepting book reviews of recent publications related to General and Digestive Surgery.
期刊最新文献
Las complicaciones en cirugía. Algo más que una asimetría de género ¿Son los cirujanos la peor parte de la cirugía? Complicaciones postoperatorias tras cirugía inversa hepática. Proyecto RENACI El síndrome de KILT Neumotórax iatrogénico masivo tras neumoperitoneo progresivo preoperatorio
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1