Single position, prone oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF)—case illustration and technical considerations

TianYi Wu, Q. Yeo, J. Oh
{"title":"Single position, prone oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF)—case illustration and technical considerations","authors":"TianYi Wu, Q. Yeo, J. Oh","doi":"10.21037/jss-23-95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is a powerful method to treat various spinal conditions and is frequently combined with posterior instrumentation. This is traditionally performed in dual positions, with the patient first in lateral then turned prone. Single position lateral surgery (SPS-L) has been studied in a bid to improve surgical efficiency and reduce operative costs, but various limitations have been identified. More recently, the single position prone surgery (SPS-P) has been described as an alternative to address some of these limitations. This case illustrates a patient who underwent SPS-P using an OLIF corridor with subsequent posterior decompression and instrumentation. The benefits and limitations of this procedure compared to the conventional techniques are highlighted in this case. We present the case of a 75-year-old female presenting with thoracic myelopathy over T11/12 and concurrent L2–4 spinal stenosis. She underwent OLIF of L2/3 and L3/4, posterior decompression of T11/12 and L2/3, and posterior instrumented fusion from T10–L4 via a single prone position. We aim to describe the advantages of this approach and the challenges encountered through our experience. SPS-P offers numerous benefits compared to the already powerful SPS-L. In the upper levels of the lumbar spine, a pre-psoas approach may also be feasible. However, the prone lateral technique does not replace all patients suited for a lateral interbody fusion but should be seen as a viable option for selected cases such as those with previous fusion at the L5/S1 with adjacent degeneration requiring extension and posterior fixation.","PeriodicalId":509805,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-23-95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is a powerful method to treat various spinal conditions and is frequently combined with posterior instrumentation. This is traditionally performed in dual positions, with the patient first in lateral then turned prone. Single position lateral surgery (SPS-L) has been studied in a bid to improve surgical efficiency and reduce operative costs, but various limitations have been identified. More recently, the single position prone surgery (SPS-P) has been described as an alternative to address some of these limitations. This case illustrates a patient who underwent SPS-P using an OLIF corridor with subsequent posterior decompression and instrumentation. The benefits and limitations of this procedure compared to the conventional techniques are highlighted in this case. We present the case of a 75-year-old female presenting with thoracic myelopathy over T11/12 and concurrent L2–4 spinal stenosis. She underwent OLIF of L2/3 and L3/4, posterior decompression of T11/12 and L2/3, and posterior instrumented fusion from T10–L4 via a single prone position. We aim to describe the advantages of this approach and the challenges encountered through our experience. SPS-P offers numerous benefits compared to the already powerful SPS-L. In the upper levels of the lumbar spine, a pre-psoas approach may also be feasible. However, the prone lateral technique does not replace all patients suited for a lateral interbody fusion but should be seen as a viable option for selected cases such as those with previous fusion at the L5/S1 with adjacent degeneration requiring extension and posterior fixation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单体位、俯卧位斜侧椎间融合术(OLIF)--病例说明和技术注意事项
斜外侧椎体间融合术(OLIF)是治疗各种脊柱疾病的有效方法,经常与后路器械结合使用。这种手术传统上采用双体位,患者先侧卧,然后俯卧。为了提高手术效率和降低手术成本,人们对单侧位手术(SPS-L)进行了研究,但也发现了各种局限性。最近,单体位俯卧手术(SPS-P)作为一种替代方案被描述出来,以解决其中的一些局限性。本病例展示了一位使用 OLIF 通道进行单体位俯卧位手术(SPS-P)的患者,该手术随后进行了后路减压和器械植入。与传统技术相比,该手术的优点和局限性在本病例中得到了强调。我们介绍了一例 75 岁女性的病例,她患有 T11/12 以上的胸椎脊髓病,并同时伴有 L2-4 椎管狭窄。她接受了 L2/3 和 L3/4 的 OLIF、T11/12 和 L2/3 的后路减压以及 T10-L4 的后路器械融合术。我们的目的是通过我们的经验来描述这种方法的优势和遇到的挑战。与功能强大的 SPS-L 相比,SPS-P 具有诸多优势。在腰椎的高位,也可以采用预腰椎侧凸入路。然而,俯卧侧位技术并不能取代所有适合侧位椎体间融合术的患者,但对于一些经过选择的病例,如曾在L5/S1进行过融合术,但邻近部位出现退变,需要进行延伸和后路固定的病例,俯卧侧位技术应被视为一种可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Expandable cages that expand both height and lordosis provide improved immediate effect on sagittal alignment and short-term clinical outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) Paired and matched analysis of neurological outcomes in revision surgery for cervical myelopathy following delayed neurological decline The use of carbon fiber/polyetheretherketone (CF/PEEK) in pedicle screw fixation for spinal neoplasms—potential advantages in postoperative imaging and radiotherapy planning A case report of lobular intradural extramedullary capillary hemangioma in a 14-year-old patient: resection and reconstruction A clinical review of hand manifestations of cervical myelopathy, cervical radiculopathy, radial, ulnar, and median nerve neuropathies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1