Explaining answers generated by knowledge graph embeddings

IF 3.2 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE International Journal of Approximate Reasoning Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ijar.2024.109183
Andrey Ruschel , Arthur Colombini Gusmão , Fabio Gagliardi Cozman
{"title":"Explaining answers generated by knowledge graph embeddings","authors":"Andrey Ruschel ,&nbsp;Arthur Colombini Gusmão ,&nbsp;Fabio Gagliardi Cozman","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2024.109183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Completion of large-scale knowledge bases, such as DBPedia or Freebase, often relies on embedding models that turn symbolic relations into vector-based representations. Such embedding models are rather opaque to the human user. Research in interpretability has emphasized non-relational classifiers, such as deep neural networks, and has devoted less effort to opaque models extracted from relational structures, such as knowledge graph embeddings. We introduce techniques that produce explanations, expressed as logical rules, for predictions based on the embeddings of knowledge graphs. Algorithms build explanations out of paths in an input knowledge graph, searched through contextual and heuristic cues.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13842,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 109183"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X24000707","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Completion of large-scale knowledge bases, such as DBPedia or Freebase, often relies on embedding models that turn symbolic relations into vector-based representations. Such embedding models are rather opaque to the human user. Research in interpretability has emphasized non-relational classifiers, such as deep neural networks, and has devoted less effort to opaque models extracted from relational structures, such as knowledge graph embeddings. We introduce techniques that produce explanations, expressed as logical rules, for predictions based on the embeddings of knowledge graphs. Algorithms build explanations out of paths in an input knowledge graph, searched through contextual and heuristic cues.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解释由知识图谱嵌入生成的答案
大型知识库(如 DBPedia 或 Freebase)的完成通常依赖于将符号关系转化为基于向量的表示的嵌入模型。这种嵌入模型对人类用户来说相当不透明。可解释性研究强调的是深度神经网络等非关系分类器,而对知识图嵌入等从关系结构中提取的不透明模型的研究则较少。我们介绍的技术可以为基于知识图嵌入的预测提供解释,并以逻辑规则的形式表达。算法根据输入知识图谱中的路径建立解释,并通过上下文和启发式线索进行搜索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
170
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Approximate Reasoning is intended to serve as a forum for the treatment of imprecision and uncertainty in Artificial and Computational Intelligence, covering both the foundations of uncertainty theories, and the design of intelligent systems for scientific and engineering applications. It publishes high-quality research papers describing theoretical developments or innovative applications, as well as review articles on topics of general interest. Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, probabilistic reasoning and Bayesian networks, imprecise probabilities, random sets, belief functions (Dempster-Shafer theory), possibility theory, fuzzy sets, rough sets, decision theory, non-additive measures and integrals, qualitative reasoning about uncertainty, comparative probability orderings, game-theoretic probability, default reasoning, nonstandard logics, argumentation systems, inconsistency tolerant reasoning, elicitation techniques, philosophical foundations and psychological models of uncertain reasoning. Domains of application for uncertain reasoning systems include risk analysis and assessment, information retrieval and database design, information fusion, machine learning, data and web mining, computer vision, image and signal processing, intelligent data analysis, statistics, multi-agent systems, etc.
期刊最新文献
Incremental attribute reduction with α,β-level intuitionistic fuzzy sets Anomaly detection based on improved k-nearest neighbor rough sets Fuzzy centrality measures in social network analysis: Theory and application in a university department collaboration network Editorial Board Inner product reduction for fuzzy formal contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1