Nurses’ critical thinking disposition and professional commitment: a cross-sectional study

Mahtab Allah Tavakoli, G. Foroughameri, Jamileh Farokhzadian, Sedigheh Khodabandeh Shahraki
{"title":"Nurses’ critical thinking disposition and professional commitment: a cross-sectional study","authors":"Mahtab Allah Tavakoli, G. Foroughameri, Jamileh Farokhzadian, Sedigheh Khodabandeh Shahraki","doi":"10.2478/fon-2024-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n High-quality and successful nursing care delivery in a variety of situations requires critical thinking training and professional commitment. The present study aimed to investigate critical thinking disposition, professional commitment, and the relationship between these 2 variables among nurses.\n \n \n \n As a result of stratified random sampling, 201 nurses were enrolled in the present cross-sectional study. Data were gathered using a socio-demographic form, the Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CTDI), and the Nurses’ Professional Commitment Scale (NPCS).\n \n \n \n Although the critical thinking disposition scores were at a moderate level (115.70 ± 13.55), the mean score for professional commitment was high (91.37 ± 11.77). A positive correlation was found between critical thinking disposition and professional commitment (r = 0.67, P = 0.001).\n \n \n \n Nursing managers are urged to employ strategies to enhance nurses’ critical thinking disposition and professional commitment.\n","PeriodicalId":510754,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Nursing","volume":"9 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2024-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-quality and successful nursing care delivery in a variety of situations requires critical thinking training and professional commitment. The present study aimed to investigate critical thinking disposition, professional commitment, and the relationship between these 2 variables among nurses. As a result of stratified random sampling, 201 nurses were enrolled in the present cross-sectional study. Data were gathered using a socio-demographic form, the Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CTDI), and the Nurses’ Professional Commitment Scale (NPCS). Although the critical thinking disposition scores were at a moderate level (115.70 ± 13.55), the mean score for professional commitment was high (91.37 ± 11.77). A positive correlation was found between critical thinking disposition and professional commitment (r = 0.67, P = 0.001). Nursing managers are urged to employ strategies to enhance nurses’ critical thinking disposition and professional commitment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士的批判性思维倾向与职业承诺:一项横断面研究
在各种情况下提供高质量和成功的护理服务需要批判性思维训练和职业承诺。本研究旨在调查护士的批判性思维倾向、职业承诺以及这两个变量之间的关系。 通过分层随机抽样,201 名护士被纳入本横断面研究。研究使用社会人口学表格、批判性思维倾向量表(CTDI)和护士职业承诺量表(NPCS)收集数据。 尽管批判性思维处置得分处于中等水平(115.70 ± 13.55),但专业承诺的平均得分较高(91.37 ± 11.77)。研究发现,批判性思维处置与专业承诺之间存在正相关(r = 0.67,P = 0.001)。 我们呼吁护理管理者采取相应策略,提高护士的批判性思维处置能力和专业承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors influencing discharge readiness among patients with mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke: a cross-sectional study Nurses’ attitude toward patients’ safety climate during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study† Relationship between sleep quality and blood pressure level in nurses performing shift work Clinical competency: perceptions of nursing interns and clinical mentors Irregular dietary habits as a predictor of stunting occurrence among children under 5 years of age: a literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1