Comparison of the efficiency of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and manual therapy in children with cerebral palsy with lower urinary system dysfunction- a randomized prospective trial

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Journal of Pediatric Urology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.03.027
Betul Unal , Pelin Pisirici , Aygul Koseoglu Kurt , Halil Tugtepe
{"title":"Comparison of the efficiency of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and manual therapy in children with cerebral palsy with lower urinary system dysfunction- a randomized prospective trial","authors":"Betul Unal ,&nbsp;Pelin Pisirici ,&nbsp;Aygul Koseoglu Kurt ,&nbsp;Halil Tugtepe","doi":"10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.03.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Neurological defects in children with cerebral palsy<span><span> (CP) not only affect their motor skills but also lead to bladder and bowel problems. Although most children with CP have achieved </span>urinary<span><span><span> control, more than 50% of cases experience lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Common LUTS complaints observed in CP include delayed toilet training, </span>urinary incontinence, increased frequency of urination, urgency, </span>urinary hesitancy, and recurrent urinary tract infections.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to prospectively evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two different physiotherapy approaches, sacral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and massage, on lower urinary tract dysfunction in children with CP.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A total of 54 children with CP who had the Dysfunctional Voiding Scoring System (DVISS) of 8.5 or higher were included in the study. Children were randomized to the TENS (TG; n = 27) and Manual Therapy (MG; n = 27) groups. TENS application was performed 2 sessions in a week for 20 min for a total of 12 weeks. The electrodes used during the application were adhered bilaterally to the parasacral region (S2–S4). 4 electrodes of 5 × 5 cm were used. Classical bowel massage was applied to the MG with the friction massage technique twice a week for 12 weeks. Manual therapy applications were performed in the form of abdominal, colon, and friction massage, twice a week for 20 min by the physiotherapist. Massage was applied to the abdominal region between the lower subcostal border and the anterior superior iliac spine.</div><div>Questionnaires were applied before and after treatment interventions: DVISS, functional bladder capacity<span><span> (FBC), frequency of voiding, and urinary incontinence episodes evaluated by bladder diary, Bristol Gaita Scale, and Pediatric Incontinence </span>Quality of Life Scale (PIN-Q) used.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The decrease in the episodes of incontinence was higher in the TG (p = 0.037; p &lt; 0.05). FBC increased after treatment in both groups, but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.683; p &gt; 0.05). Manual therapy was more effective in improving constipation symptoms. In both groups, DVISS and PIN-Q values decreased after treatment, but the decrease in TG was statistically significant in the evaluation made between groups (p = 0.001; p &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both parasacral TENS and massage provided a significant improvement in LUTS, constipation, and quality of life but TENS showed a bigger improvement. We suggest adding these interventions to the treatment of bladder and bowel problems in CP children.<span><div><span><span><p><span>Summary table</span>. <!-->Pre and Post Evaluation Values of The Scales.</p></span></span><div><table><tbody><tr><td>Variables</td><td>Groups</td><td>Pre-intervention</td><td>Post-intervention</td><td>P Value<span><span><sup>a</sup></span></span></td></tr><tr><td>DVISS, mean (SD), (point)</td><td>TG (n = 27)</td><td>14.41(3.52)</td><td>6.81(2.02)</td><td><strong><em>0.001∗∗</em></strong></td></tr><tr><td>MG (n = 27)</td><td>14.67 (3.66)</td><td>9.52 (2.17)</td><td><strong><em>0.001∗∗</em></strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>P Value</strong><span><span><sup>b</sup></span></span></td><td><strong>0.81</strong></td><td><strong><em>0.001∗∗</em></strong></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>PIN-Q, mean (SD), (point)</td><td>TG (n = 27)</td><td>33.07 (6.63)</td><td>15.96 (4.06)</td><td><strong><em>0.001∗∗∗</em></strong></td></tr><tr><td>MG (n = 27)</td><td>29.89 (5.12)</td><td>18.44 (5)</td><td><strong><em>0.001∗∗</em></strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>P Value</strong><span><span><sup>b</sup></span></span></td><td><strong>0.055</strong></td><td><strong><em>0.043∗</em></strong></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><strong><em>Voiding diary</em></strong></th></tr><tr><td>Functional bladder capacity, mean (SD), (mL)<span><span><sup>b</sup></span></span></td><td>TG (n = 27)</td><td>175.74 (68.51)</td><td>208.33 (84.98)</td><td><strong><em>0.001∗∗</em></strong></td></tr><tr><td>MG (n = 27)</td><td>185.19 (61.98)</td><td>202.04 (64.74)</td><td><strong><em>0.001∗∗</em></strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>P Value</strong><span><span><sup>b</sup></span></span></td><td><strong>0.466</strong></td><td><strong>0.683</strong></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Voiding frequency, mean (SD), (number/day)</td><td>TG (n = 27)</td><td>7.65 (1.02)</td><td>6.35 (0.6)</td><td><strong><em>0.001∗∗</em></strong></td></tr><tr><td>MG (n = 27)</td><td>7.43 (1.14)</td><td>6.15 (0.66)</td><td><strong><em>0.001∗∗</em></strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>P Value</strong><span><span><sup>b</sup></span></span></td><td><strong>0.293</strong></td><td><strong>0.208</strong></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Frequency of incontinence episodes, mean (SD), (number/day)</td><td>TG (n = 27)</td><td>4.3 (1.07)</td><td>0.81(1.08)</td><td><strong><em>0.001∗∗∗</em></strong></td></tr><tr><td>MG (n = 27)</td><td>3.78 (0.8)</td><td>1.59 (1.15)</td><td><strong><em>0.001∗∗</em></strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>P Value</strong><span><span><sup>b</sup></span></span></td><td>0.037</td><td><strong><em>0.037∗</em></strong></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Urge symptom, n (%)</td><td>TG (n = 27)</td><td>19 (70.37)</td><td>10 (37.03)</td><td>NA</td></tr><tr><td>MG (n = 27)</td><td>16 (59.25)</td><td>8 (29.62)</td><td>NA</td></tr><tr><td><strong>P Value</strong><span><span><sup>c</sup></span></span></td><td><strong>0.393</strong></td><td><strong>0.999</strong></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></div><div><div>TG: transcutaneous electric stimulation group, MG: manual group, SD: standard deviation, BGS: Bristol gaita score.</div></div><dl><dt>a</dt><dd><div>Wilcoxon test p &lt; 0.01∗∗.</div></dd><dt>b</dt><dd><div>Mann Whitney U test p &lt; 0.05∗.</div></dd><dt>c</dt><dd><div>Chi-square test p &lt; 0.01∗∗∗; NA, not applicable.</div></dd></dl></div></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":16747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","volume":"21 2","pages":"Pages 260-267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477513124001815","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Neurological defects in children with cerebral palsy (CP) not only affect their motor skills but also lead to bladder and bowel problems. Although most children with CP have achieved urinary control, more than 50% of cases experience lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Common LUTS complaints observed in CP include delayed toilet training, urinary incontinence, increased frequency of urination, urgency, urinary hesitancy, and recurrent urinary tract infections.

Objective

This study aimed to prospectively evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two different physiotherapy approaches, sacral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and massage, on lower urinary tract dysfunction in children with CP.

Method

A total of 54 children with CP who had the Dysfunctional Voiding Scoring System (DVISS) of 8.5 or higher were included in the study. Children were randomized to the TENS (TG; n = 27) and Manual Therapy (MG; n = 27) groups. TENS application was performed 2 sessions in a week for 20 min for a total of 12 weeks. The electrodes used during the application were adhered bilaterally to the parasacral region (S2–S4). 4 electrodes of 5 × 5 cm were used. Classical bowel massage was applied to the MG with the friction massage technique twice a week for 12 weeks. Manual therapy applications were performed in the form of abdominal, colon, and friction massage, twice a week for 20 min by the physiotherapist. Massage was applied to the abdominal region between the lower subcostal border and the anterior superior iliac spine.
Questionnaires were applied before and after treatment interventions: DVISS, functional bladder capacity (FBC), frequency of voiding, and urinary incontinence episodes evaluated by bladder diary, Bristol Gaita Scale, and Pediatric Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (PIN-Q) used.

Results

The decrease in the episodes of incontinence was higher in the TG (p = 0.037; p < 0.05). FBC increased after treatment in both groups, but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.683; p > 0.05). Manual therapy was more effective in improving constipation symptoms. In both groups, DVISS and PIN-Q values decreased after treatment, but the decrease in TG was statistically significant in the evaluation made between groups (p = 0.001; p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Both parasacral TENS and massage provided a significant improvement in LUTS, constipation, and quality of life but TENS showed a bigger improvement. We suggest adding these interventions to the treatment of bladder and bowel problems in CP children.

Summary table. Pre and Post Evaluation Values of The Scales.

VariablesGroupsPre-interventionPost-interventionP Valuea
DVISS, mean (SD), (point)TG (n = 27)14.41(3.52)6.81(2.02)0.001∗∗
MG (n = 27)14.67 (3.66)9.52 (2.17)0.001∗∗
P Valueb0.810.001∗∗
PIN-Q, mean (SD), (point)TG (n = 27)33.07 (6.63)15.96 (4.06)0.001∗∗∗
MG (n = 27)29.89 (5.12)18.44 (5)0.001∗∗
P Valueb0.0550.043∗
Voiding diary
Functional bladder capacity, mean (SD), (mL)bTG (n = 27)175.74 (68.51)208.33 (84.98)0.001∗∗
MG (n = 27)185.19 (61.98)202.04 (64.74)0.001∗∗
P Valueb0.4660.683
Voiding frequency, mean (SD), (number/day)TG (n = 27)7.65 (1.02)6.35 (0.6)0.001∗∗
MG (n = 27)7.43 (1.14)6.15 (0.66)0.001∗∗
P Valueb0.2930.208
Frequency of incontinence episodes, mean (SD), (number/day)TG (n = 27)4.3 (1.07)0.81(1.08)0.001∗∗∗
MG (n = 27)3.78 (0.8)1.59 (1.15)0.001∗∗
P Valueb0.0370.037∗
Urge symptom, n (%)TG (n = 27)19 (70.37)10 (37.03)NA
MG (n = 27)16 (59.25)8 (29.62)NA
P Valuec0.3930.999
TG: transcutaneous electric stimulation group, MG: manual group, SD: standard deviation, BGS: Bristol gaita score.
a
Wilcoxon test p < 0.01∗∗.
b
Mann Whitney U test p < 0.05∗.
c
Chi-square test p < 0.01∗∗∗; NA, not applicable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮神经电刺激和手法治疗对伴有下尿路系统功能障碍的脑瘫儿童的疗效比较--随机前瞻性试验
脑瘫儿童的神经系统缺陷不仅影响他们的运动技能,还会导致膀胱和肠道问题。虽然大多数患有CP的儿童已经控制了尿,但超过50%的病例会出现下尿路症状(LUTS)。CP中常见的LUTS主诉包括如厕训练延迟、尿失禁、排尿频率增加、尿急、尿犹豫和反复尿路感染。目的前瞻性评价和比较经皮骶部电神经刺激(TENS)和按摩两种不同的物理治疗方法对CP患儿下尿路功能障碍的治疗效果。方法选择排尿功能障碍评分系统(DVISS) 8.5分及以上的CP患儿54例。儿童随机分为TENS组(TG;n = 27)和手工疗法(MG;N = 27)组。TENS应用每周进行2次,每次20分钟,共12周。应用过程中使用的电极双侧粘附在骶旁区(S2-S4)。采用4个5 × 5 cm的电极。用摩擦按摩手法对大网膜进行经典肠道按摩,每周2次,连续12周。物理治疗师以腹部、结肠和摩擦按摩的形式进行手工治疗,每周两次,每次20分钟。按摩于下肋下缘与髂前上棘之间的腹部区域。在治疗干预前后进行问卷调查:使用膀胱日记、布里斯托尔Gaita量表和儿童失禁生活质量量表(PIN-Q)评估dvis、膀胱功能容量(FBC)、排尿频率和尿失禁发作。结果TG组尿失禁发生率明显降低(p = 0.037;p & lt;0.05)。两组治疗后FBC均升高,但两组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.683;p比;0.05)。手工疗法对改善便秘症状更有效。两组治疗后dvis、PIN-Q值均下降,但TG下降有统计学意义(p = 0.001;p & lt;0.01)。结论骶旁TENS和按摩均能显著改善LUTS、便秘和生活质量,但TENS的改善效果更大。我们建议将这些干预措施添加到CP儿童的膀胱和肠道问题的治疗中。汇总表。量表前后评价值。变量groupspreinterinteronpostinteronp ValueaDVISS, mean (SD),(点)TG (n = 27)14.41(3.52)6.81(2.02)0.001∗∗MG (n = 27)14.67(3.66)9.52(2.17)0.001∗∗P Valueb0.810.001∗∗PIN-Q, mean (SD),(点)TG (n = 27)33.07(6.63)15.96(4.06)0.001∗∗MG (n = 27)29.89(5.12)18.44(5)0.001∗∗P Valueb0.0550.043∗排尿尿功能膀胱容量,mean (SD), (mL)bTG (n = 27)175.74(68.51)208.33(84.98)0.001∗∗MG (n = 27)185.19(61.98)202.04(64.74)0.001∗P valueb0.4660.68排尿频率,平均(SD),(数目/天)TG (n = 27)7.65(1.02)6.35(0.6)0.001∗∗MG (n = 27)7.43(1.14)6.15(0.66)0.001∗∗P valueb0.2930.208失禁发作频率,平均(SD),(数目/天)TG (n = 27)4.3(1.07)0.81(1.08)0.001∗∗MG (n = 27)3.78(0.8)1.59(1.15)0.001∗P Valueb0.0370.037∗冲动症状,n (%)TG (n = 27)19 (70.37)10 (37.03)NAMG (n = 27)16 (59.25)8 (29.62)NAP Valuec0.3930.999TG:经皮电刺激组,MG:手刺激组,SD:标准差,BGS: Bristol gaita评分。威尔考克森试验p <;0.01∗∗。曼惠特尼U测试p <;0.05∗。平方检验p <;0.01∗∗∗;NA,不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Urology
Journal of Pediatric Urology PEDIATRICS-UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Urology publishes submitted research and clinical articles relating to Pediatric Urology which have been accepted after adequate peer review. It publishes regular articles that have been submitted after invitation, that cover the curriculum of Pediatric Urology, and enable trainee surgeons to attain theoretical competence of the sub-specialty. It publishes regular reviews of pediatric urological articles appearing in other journals. It publishes invited review articles by recognised experts on modern or controversial aspects of the sub-specialty. It enables any affiliated society to advertise society events or information in the journal without charge and will publish abstracts of papers to be read at society meetings.
期刊最新文献
How I do it: Single-port serpentine-arm robot in infants pyeloplasty Prophylactic antibiotic in pubertal testicular torsion: Is it Justified? Impact of transfer status, time to operation, and orchiectomy rates in pediatric testicular torsion: A retrospective cohort analysis Factors influencing timely management and outcomes in testicular torsion An international multicenter cohort study of management and outcomes of undescended testis in German-speaking countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1