Study of mindset among learners and educators in an Indian medical school—A questionnaire-based survey

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1661_22
Sujatha Rajaragupathy, Sumitra Govindarajan, Deepika Ponnusamy
{"title":"Study of mindset among learners and educators in an Indian medical school—A questionnaire-based survey","authors":"Sujatha Rajaragupathy, Sumitra Govindarajan, Deepika Ponnusamy","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1661_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Mindset varies along a spectrum of two extremes- fixed and growth. Individuals with growth mindset embrace new challenges readily and believe that intelligence is malleable. Mindset theory has gained focus as a principal underpinning value of health professions education, as it is aligned with the goals of competency-based education. The study aims to assess the mindset of health professional educators and learners.\n \n \n \n A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted in a private medical college in South India. A pre-validated modified version of Dweck’s (2000) Implicit Theories of Intelligence Questionnaire was administered to the study participants. Participants responded to 10 items using a four-point Likert scale, rating the degree to which they agreed or disagreed with each statement. The quantitative data were expressed in means and percentages.\n \n \n \n A total of192 students and 25 faculty participated in the study. Among students, 45.8% (n = 88) had strong growth mindset, 42.1% (n = 81) had growth mindset with some fixed ideas, 10.9% (n = 21) had fixed mindset with some growth ideas, and 1% (n = 2) had strong fixed mindset. Among faculty 4% (n = 1) had fixed mindset with growth ideas, 44% (n = 11) had growth mindset with fixed ideas, and 52% (n = 13) had strong growth mindset.\n \n \n \n In this study, educators and learners of a medical school were found to have predominantly growth mindset. Fostering growth mindset among stakeholders of health professions education is essential for effective teaching and learning in competency-based education.\n","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1661_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mindset varies along a spectrum of two extremes- fixed and growth. Individuals with growth mindset embrace new challenges readily and believe that intelligence is malleable. Mindset theory has gained focus as a principal underpinning value of health professions education, as it is aligned with the goals of competency-based education. The study aims to assess the mindset of health professional educators and learners. A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted in a private medical college in South India. A pre-validated modified version of Dweck’s (2000) Implicit Theories of Intelligence Questionnaire was administered to the study participants. Participants responded to 10 items using a four-point Likert scale, rating the degree to which they agreed or disagreed with each statement. The quantitative data were expressed in means and percentages. A total of192 students and 25 faculty participated in the study. Among students, 45.8% (n = 88) had strong growth mindset, 42.1% (n = 81) had growth mindset with some fixed ideas, 10.9% (n = 21) had fixed mindset with some growth ideas, and 1% (n = 2) had strong fixed mindset. Among faculty 4% (n = 1) had fixed mindset with growth ideas, 44% (n = 11) had growth mindset with fixed ideas, and 52% (n = 13) had strong growth mindset. In this study, educators and learners of a medical school were found to have predominantly growth mindset. Fostering growth mindset among stakeholders of health professions education is essential for effective teaching and learning in competency-based education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度医学院学习者和教育者的心态研究--基于问卷的调查
思维模式有固定思维模式和成长思维模式两个极端。具有成长型思维模式的人乐于接受新的挑战,并相信智力是可塑的。心态理论与能力本位教育的目标相一致,因此作为卫生专业教育的主要支撑价值而备受关注。本研究旨在评估卫生专业教育者和学习者的心态。 在南印度的一所私立医学院进行了一项横向问卷调查。研究人员对 Dweck(2000 年)的内隐智力理论问卷进行了预验证。参与者使用李克特四点量表对 10 个项目进行了回答,并对他们同意或不同意每个陈述的程度进行了评分。定量数据以平均数和百分比表示。 共有 192 名学生和 25 名教师参与了研究。在学生中,45.8%(n = 88)具有强烈的成长型思维模式,42.1%(n = 81)具有成长型思维模式并带有一些固定观念,10.9%(n = 21)具有固定思维模式并带有一些成长观念,1%(n = 2)具有强烈的固定思维模式。在教师中,4%(n = 1)拥有固定型思维模式和成长型思维模式,44%(n = 11)拥有成长型思维模式和固定型思维模式,52%(n = 13)拥有强烈的成长型思维模式。 本研究发现,医学院的教育者和学习者主要具有成长型思维模式。在卫生专业教育的利益相关者中培养成长型思维对于基于能力的教育中的有效教学至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of training nursing process using the concept map on caring self-efficacy of nursing students in pediatric departments. Ethical and moral principles for oncology healthcare workers: A brief report from a Bioethics consortium emphasizing on need for education. Evaluation of antenatal care utilization and its effects on obstetric and newborn outcomes at a public and private hospital of Karnataka: A comparative study. Factors influencing knowledge sharing between scientific specialists in knowledge networks and communities of practice: A systematic literature review. Home-based supportive and health care services based on functional ability in older adults in Iran.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1