Rehabilitation Professionals’ Perspectives on Human Rights, Disability, and Science: A Qualitative Study

Anne M. Bryden PhD, OTR/L , Kim D. Anderson PhD , Brian Gran PhD, JD
{"title":"Rehabilitation Professionals’ Perspectives on Human Rights, Disability, and Science: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Anne M. Bryden PhD, OTR/L ,&nbsp;Kim D. Anderson PhD ,&nbsp;Brian Gran PhD, JD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the attitudes and knowledge of rehabilitation professionals concerning human rights within the context of disability, science, and technology access.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A qualitative study using in-depth semi-structured interviews.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>A large, urban, academically-affiliated rehabilitation research center.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>We conducted semi-structured interviews with rehabilitation professionals who specialize in spinal cord injury (SCI) care, including 6 physicians, 3 physical therapists, 2 occupational therapists, 2 nurses, 1 rehabilitation engineer, and 1 rehabilitation psychologist (N=15). Participants were purposively recruited through e-mail letters to members of the American Spinal Injury Association. Efforts were made to recruit a diverse cohort of rehabilitation professionals based on profession, sex, age, and race. Interviews were conducted in person during the 2018 annual meeting or by phone after the meeting.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Not applicable.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded to identify emerging themes within and across participants’ content.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Primary findings show that most respondents were unaware of disability-relevant human rights doctrine. None was aware of the right to science as articulated in Article 15 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. Only 2 respondents had previously considered injustices experienced by their clients as human rights violations, yet nearly all were intrigued by framing access difficulties within the right to science paradigm. Overall, participants reported they would find value in implementing human rights in their work.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Rehabilitation professionals are receptive to a human rights framework. Further research is needed to identify actionable steps for implementing principles of human rights to increase access to technology by individuals with SCI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524000260/pdfft?md5=a00b4c821e67f90d0f96fb330cc0a814&pid=1-s2.0-S2590109524000260-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524000260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the attitudes and knowledge of rehabilitation professionals concerning human rights within the context of disability, science, and technology access.

Design

A qualitative study using in-depth semi-structured interviews.

Setting

A large, urban, academically-affiliated rehabilitation research center.

Participants

We conducted semi-structured interviews with rehabilitation professionals who specialize in spinal cord injury (SCI) care, including 6 physicians, 3 physical therapists, 2 occupational therapists, 2 nurses, 1 rehabilitation engineer, and 1 rehabilitation psychologist (N=15). Participants were purposively recruited through e-mail letters to members of the American Spinal Injury Association. Efforts were made to recruit a diverse cohort of rehabilitation professionals based on profession, sex, age, and race. Interviews were conducted in person during the 2018 annual meeting or by phone after the meeting.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded to identify emerging themes within and across participants’ content.

Results

Primary findings show that most respondents were unaware of disability-relevant human rights doctrine. None was aware of the right to science as articulated in Article 15 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. Only 2 respondents had previously considered injustices experienced by their clients as human rights violations, yet nearly all were intrigued by framing access difficulties within the right to science paradigm. Overall, participants reported they would find value in implementing human rights in their work.

Conclusions

Rehabilitation professionals are receptive to a human rights framework. Further research is needed to identify actionable steps for implementing principles of human rights to increase access to technology by individuals with SCI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康复专业人员对人权、残疾和科学的看法:定性研究
目标调查康复专业人员在残疾、科学和技术获取方面对人权的态度和知识。设计采用深入的半结构式访谈进行定性研究。参与者是通过向美国脊柱损伤协会会员发送电子邮件的方式有目的地招募的。我们努力根据职业、性别、年龄和种族招募不同的康复专业人员。访谈在 2018 年年会期间当面进行,或在会后通过电话进行。干预措施不适用。主要结果测量对访谈进行记录、逐字转录和编码,以确定参与者内容内部和之间的新主题。没有人知道《经济、社会、文化权利国际公约》第 15 条中阐述的科学权。只有两名受访者曾将其服务对象遭受的不公正待遇视为对人权的侵犯,但几乎所有受访者都对将获取困难纳入科学权范式的框架感到好奇。总体而言,参与者表示他们会发现在工作中落实人权的价值。需要进一步开展研究,确定实施人权原则的可行步骤,以增加 SCI 患者对技术的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perceived Barriers to Leisure-Time Physical Activity Among Physically Active Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury Psychometrics of Wearable Devices Measuring Physical Activity in Ambulant Children With Gait Abnormalities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Robotic Rigor: Validity of the Kinarm End-Point Robot Visually Guided Reaching Test in Multiple Sclerosis The Effect of Sensory Reweighting on Postural Control and Cortical Activity in Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot Study The Impact of Executive Function on Retention and Compliance in Physical Therapy in Veterans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1