Biomechanical Analysis of a New Odd-Numbered Strand Suture Technique for Early Active Mobilization After Primary Flexor Tendon Repair

{"title":"Biomechanical Analysis of a New Odd-Numbered Strand Suture Technique for Early Active Mobilization After Primary Flexor Tendon Repair","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The placement of multistrand sutures during flexor tendon repair is complex and challenging. We developed a new, simpler, nine-strand suture, which we term the Tajima nines. The Tajima nines repair method is a new odd-numbered strand tendon technique.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fourteen porcine flexor tendons were transected and repaired using the Tajima nines repair method, without placement of peripheral sutures. This technique is a modification of the Lim and Tsai repair method; it uses a 4-0 monofilament nylon, 3-strand line, and two needles. The repaired tendons were tested for linear, noncyclic, load-to-failure tensile strength. The initial gap, 2-mm gap-formation force, and ultimate strength were measured.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The initial gap-formation force was 27.9 ± 7.5 newtons (N), the 2-mm gap-formation force was 39.2 ± 4.7 N, and the ultimate strength was 76.7 ± 17.2 N. Eight, three, and three of the 14 tendons repaired using the Tajima nines method demonstrated failure because of thread breakage, knot failure, and suture pull-out, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This biomechanical study demonstrated that Tajima nines repair was associated with particularly high initial tension at the repair site; there were minor variations in the initial load and 2-mm gap-formation load. Our results suggest that Tajima nines repair with peripheral suturing allows the repaired flexor tendon to tolerate the stresses encountered during early active mobilization.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><p>This simple nine-strand technique will be particularly useful for inexperienced surgeons who perform early active mobilization after primary flexor tendon repair because the technique is a modification of the Lim and Tsai repair method using a triple strand instead of a double strand.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"6 4","pages":"Pages 488-493"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514124000483/pdfft?md5=576c0f194f2df83bd92ded067da99102&pid=1-s2.0-S2589514124000483-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514124000483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The placement of multistrand sutures during flexor tendon repair is complex and challenging. We developed a new, simpler, nine-strand suture, which we term the Tajima nines. The Tajima nines repair method is a new odd-numbered strand tendon technique.

Methods

Fourteen porcine flexor tendons were transected and repaired using the Tajima nines repair method, without placement of peripheral sutures. This technique is a modification of the Lim and Tsai repair method; it uses a 4-0 monofilament nylon, 3-strand line, and two needles. The repaired tendons were tested for linear, noncyclic, load-to-failure tensile strength. The initial gap, 2-mm gap-formation force, and ultimate strength were measured.

Results

The initial gap-formation force was 27.9 ± 7.5 newtons (N), the 2-mm gap-formation force was 39.2 ± 4.7 N, and the ultimate strength was 76.7 ± 17.2 N. Eight, three, and three of the 14 tendons repaired using the Tajima nines method demonstrated failure because of thread breakage, knot failure, and suture pull-out, respectively.

Conclusions

This biomechanical study demonstrated that Tajima nines repair was associated with particularly high initial tension at the repair site; there were minor variations in the initial load and 2-mm gap-formation load. Our results suggest that Tajima nines repair with peripheral suturing allows the repaired flexor tendon to tolerate the stresses encountered during early active mobilization.

Clinical relevance

This simple nine-strand technique will be particularly useful for inexperienced surgeons who perform early active mobilization after primary flexor tendon repair because the technique is a modification of the Lim and Tsai repair method using a triple strand instead of a double strand.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于初级屈肌腱修复术后早期主动活动的奇数股缝合新技术的生物力学分析
目的在屈肌腱修复过程中,多股缝合线的放置既复杂又具有挑战性。我们开发了一种新的、更简单的九股缝合线,我们称之为田岛九股缝合线。田岛九股缝合线修复法是一种新型奇数股肌腱技术。方法采用田岛九股缝合线修复法横断和修复 14 条猪屈肌腱,无需放置外围缝合线。该技术是对 Lim 和 Tsai 修复方法的改进;它使用 4-0 单丝尼龙、3 股线和两根针。对修复后的肌腱进行了线性、非循环、加载至断裂拉伸强度测试。结果初始间隙形成力为 27.9 ± 7.5 牛顿(N),2 毫米间隙形成力为 39.2 ± 4.7 牛顿(N),极限强度为 76.7 ± 17.2 牛顿(N)。在使用田岛九针法修复的 14 条肌腱中,分别有 8 条、3 条和 3 条因断线、打结失败和缝线拉出而出现失败。我们的研究结果表明,田岛九针修复术采用周边缝合,可使修复后的屈肌腱承受早期主动活动时所遇到的应力。临床意义这种简单的九针技术对于没有经验的外科医生来说特别有用,因为他们在进行初级屈肌腱修复术后要进行早期主动活动,而这种技术是对 Lim 和 Tsai 修复方法的一种改进,使用的是三针而不是双针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Scaphoid Fractures and Nonunion: A Survey-based Review of Hand Surgeon’s Practice and the Evidence Hook of Hamate Regrowth After Surgical Excision: A Report of Two Cases Possible Bupivacaine Induced Hepatitis Following Wide Awake, Local Anesthesia, No Tourniquet Carpal Tunnel Surgery: A Case Report Digital Papillary Adenocarcinoma: A Case Presentation and Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1