Combinative Hedging: Japan and Russia in the East Asian Contested Hierarchical Order

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1177/23477970241230378
Yohanes Putra Suhito, I. G. W. Wicaksana
{"title":"Combinative Hedging: Japan and Russia in the East Asian Contested Hierarchical Order","authors":"Yohanes Putra Suhito, I. G. W. Wicaksana","doi":"10.1177/23477970241230378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent developments in world politics have demonstrated that East Asia has emerged as a critical locus for great power politics, characterised by the pluralisation of power centres resulting from the competing strategic interests of the United States and China. Indeed, the regional order’s power constellation is moving towards a contested hierarchical model. The first-tier United States seeks to maintain its ‘plural hegemony’ through social compacts, while China fits within the hierarchy as a second-tier state, gradually emerging as an influential actor on the regional and global stage. Third-tier states, such as Japan, the world’s third-largest economy, and Russia, with its abundant energy resources and military prowess, have become potential swing players of influence within the evolving orders— appropriate to their respective capabilities. Observing this dynamic geopolitical environment, our article discusses the relationship between Japan and Russia as they attempt to protect their interests within a pluralising region. We argue that Japan and Russia take a combinative hedge, focusing on flexible collaboration, enabling risk mitigation and maximising short or long-term benefits.","PeriodicalId":42502,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23477970241230378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent developments in world politics have demonstrated that East Asia has emerged as a critical locus for great power politics, characterised by the pluralisation of power centres resulting from the competing strategic interests of the United States and China. Indeed, the regional order’s power constellation is moving towards a contested hierarchical model. The first-tier United States seeks to maintain its ‘plural hegemony’ through social compacts, while China fits within the hierarchy as a second-tier state, gradually emerging as an influential actor on the regional and global stage. Third-tier states, such as Japan, the world’s third-largest economy, and Russia, with its abundant energy resources and military prowess, have become potential swing players of influence within the evolving orders— appropriate to their respective capabilities. Observing this dynamic geopolitical environment, our article discusses the relationship between Japan and Russia as they attempt to protect their interests within a pluralising region. We argue that Japan and Russia take a combinative hedge, focusing on flexible collaboration, enabling risk mitigation and maximising short or long-term benefits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合对冲:东亚有争议的等级秩序中的日本和俄罗斯
世界政治的最新发展表明,东亚已成为大国政治的关键地点,其特点是美国和中国的战略利益竞争导致权力中心多元化。事实上,地区秩序的权力格局正朝着有争议的等级模式发展。第一梯队的美国试图通过社会契约维持其 "多元霸权",而中国则作为第二梯队国家融入这一等级体系,逐渐成为地区和全球舞台上有影响力的角色。第三级国家,如世界第三大经济体日本,以及拥有丰富能源资源和军事实力的俄罗斯,都已成为不断演变的秩序中具有影响力的潜在摇摆者--与其各自的能力相适应。观察到这一动态的地缘政治环境,我们的文章讨论了日本和俄罗斯之间的关系,因为它们试图在一个多元化的地区保护自己的利益。我们认为,日本和俄罗斯应采取组合式对冲,注重灵活协作、降低风险并实现短期或长期利益最大化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Book review: Malti Goel, Science Diplomacy for South Asian Countries: Insights and Breakthroughs Book review: Börje Ljunggren and Dwight H. Perkins (Eds), Vietnam: Navigating a Rapidly Changing Economy, Society and Political Order Book review: Rajesh Basrur, Subcontinental Drift: Domestic Politics and India’s Foreign Policy Book review: Michael A. McDevitt, China as a Twenty-first-century Naval Power: Theory, Practice, and Implications Book review: Sumantra Bose, Kashmir at the Crossroads: Inside India’s 21st-Century Conflict
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1