Severe asthma care trajectories: the French RAMSES cohort

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00837-2023
Jeanne-Marie Perotin, Lisa Gauquelin, Nicolas Just, Gilles Devouassoux, Cécile Chenivesse, Arnaud Bourdin, Gilles Garcia, Christel Saint Raymond, Amel Boudjemaa, Philippe Bonniaud, Pascal Chanez, Cindy Barnig, Antoine Beurnier, Cyril Maurer, Nathalie Freymond, Toufik Didi, C. Tcherakian, M. Russier, Mélanie Drucbert, Sylvie Guillo, Candice Estellat, Camille Taillé
{"title":"Severe asthma care trajectories: the French RAMSES cohort","authors":"Jeanne-Marie Perotin, Lisa Gauquelin, Nicolas Just, Gilles Devouassoux, Cécile Chenivesse, Arnaud Bourdin, Gilles Garcia, Christel Saint Raymond, Amel Boudjemaa, Philippe Bonniaud, Pascal Chanez, Cindy Barnig, Antoine Beurnier, Cyril Maurer, Nathalie Freymond, Toufik Didi, C. Tcherakian, M. Russier, Mélanie Drucbert, Sylvie Guillo, Candice Estellat, Camille Taillé","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00837-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The French RAMSES study is an observational prospective multicentre real-life cohort including severe asthmatics. The objective of the study was to compare the characteristics of patients, in terms of phenotype and asthma care trajectories, between those managed by tertiary referral centres (TRC) or secondary care centres (SCC).Patients were prospectively recruited and enrolled for a 5-year follow-up. Patients’ characteristics were analysed at inclusion and compared between TRC and SCC.Fifty-two centres (24 TRC, 28 SCC) included 2046 patients: 1502 (73.4%) were included by a TRC and 544 (26.6%) by a SCC. Patients were mainly women (62%), 53±15 yr old, 67% with Asthma control test <20, 14% received at inclusion oral corticosteroids and 66% biologics. Compared with SCC, the TRC group had more frequent comorbidities, and lower blood eosinophil count (262/mm3versus340/mm3, p=0.0036). OCS and biologics use did not differ between groups but patients in the TRC group benefited more frequently from an educational program (26%versus18%, p=0.0008), and received more frequently ≥2 sequential lines of biologics (33%versus24%, p=0.0105). In-depth investigations were more frequently performed in the TRC group (allergy tests: 74%versus62%, p<0.0001; FeNO: 56%versus21%, p<0.0001; induced sputum: 6%versus3%, p=0.0390).Phenotypes and care trajectories differed in the RAMSES cohort between SCC and TRC, probably related to different levels of asthma severity and differences in medical resources and practices among centres. This highlights the need for standardisation of severe asthma care.","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00837-2023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The French RAMSES study is an observational prospective multicentre real-life cohort including severe asthmatics. The objective of the study was to compare the characteristics of patients, in terms of phenotype and asthma care trajectories, between those managed by tertiary referral centres (TRC) or secondary care centres (SCC).Patients were prospectively recruited and enrolled for a 5-year follow-up. Patients’ characteristics were analysed at inclusion and compared between TRC and SCC.Fifty-two centres (24 TRC, 28 SCC) included 2046 patients: 1502 (73.4%) were included by a TRC and 544 (26.6%) by a SCC. Patients were mainly women (62%), 53±15 yr old, 67% with Asthma control test <20, 14% received at inclusion oral corticosteroids and 66% biologics. Compared with SCC, the TRC group had more frequent comorbidities, and lower blood eosinophil count (262/mm3versus340/mm3, p=0.0036). OCS and biologics use did not differ between groups but patients in the TRC group benefited more frequently from an educational program (26%versus18%, p=0.0008), and received more frequently ≥2 sequential lines of biologics (33%versus24%, p=0.0105). In-depth investigations were more frequently performed in the TRC group (allergy tests: 74%versus62%, p<0.0001; FeNO: 56%versus21%, p<0.0001; induced sputum: 6%versus3%, p=0.0390).Phenotypes and care trajectories differed in the RAMSES cohort between SCC and TRC, probably related to different levels of asthma severity and differences in medical resources and practices among centres. This highlights the need for standardisation of severe asthma care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
严重哮喘护理轨迹:法国 RAMSES 队列
法国 RAMSES 研究是一项观察性前瞻性多中心现实生活队列研究,研究对象包括重症哮喘患者。该研究的目的是比较由三级转诊中心(TRC)或二级医疗中心(SCC)管理的患者在表型和哮喘治疗轨迹方面的特征。52个中心(24个三级转诊中心,28个二级转诊中心)共纳入了2046名患者:52个中心(24个TRC和28个SCC)共纳入了2046名患者:其中1502名(73.4%)由TRC纳入,544名(26.6%)由SCC纳入。患者以女性为主(62%),年龄为 53±15 岁,67% 的患者哮喘控制测试结果小于 20,14% 的患者在纳入时接受了口服皮质类固醇治疗,66% 的患者接受了生物制剂治疗。与 SCC 相比,TRC 组合并症更多,血液中嗜酸性粒细胞计数更低(262/mm3 对 340/mm3,P=0.0036)。OCS和生物制剂的使用在组间无差异,但TRC组患者更常受益于教育计划(26%对18%,P=0.0008),更常连续使用≥2种生物制剂(33%对24%,P=0.0105)。TRC组进行深入检查的频率更高(过敏试验:74%对62%,P=0.0105):在 RAMSES 队列中,SCC 和 TRC 的表型和护理轨迹有所不同,这可能与哮喘严重程度不同以及各中心的医疗资源和实践不同有关。这凸显了重症哮喘护理标准化的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
期刊最新文献
Assessing post-COVID-19 respiratory dynamics: a comprehensive analysis of pulmonary function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and bronchodilator response. Cognitive interference of respiratory versus limb muscle dual tasking in healthy adults. Corticosteroid therapy in fibrotic interstitial lung disease: a modified Delphi survey. Development and validation of a machine learning-based model for post-sepsis frailty. High-flow humidified oxygen as an early intervention in children with acute severe asthma: a feasibility randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1