Which Tests Should Be Routinely Ordered Prior to Brachial Plexus Reconstruction? Results of a Delphi Panel

Christopher J. Dy, Alison L Antes, Bryan A. Sisk
{"title":"Which Tests Should Be Routinely Ordered Prior to Brachial Plexus Reconstruction? Results of a Delphi Panel","authors":"Christopher J. Dy, Alison L Antes, Bryan A. Sisk","doi":"10.1177/15563316241234336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are notable differences in how adult patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPI) are evaluated and treated. To better understand existing philosophies, we used the Delphi method to measure and foster consensus on routine use of electrodiagnostic testing, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) myelograms prior to surgery. Panelists were 10 peripheral nerve surgeons board certified in their respective specialties at 5 academic medical centers in the United States. We presented 2 cases (1 complete/pan-BPI and 1 upper trunk BPI) to panelists and asked how often they would order the following preoperative diagnostic tests: electrodiagnostic studies; ultrasound of the brachial plexus; MRI of the brachial plexus; CT myelogram. Our Delphi process included an initial survey with videoconference discussion after the first round. A second survey/videoconference round was conducted to further probe the items that did not reach consensus during the first round. Among the 10 surgeons, there was consensus that prior to brachial plexus surgery electrodiagnostic studies and MRI should be routinely ordered and ultrasound of the brachial plexus should not be routinely ordered. The group did not reach consensus on whether CT myelogram should or should not be routinely ordered. Based on our panel’s discussion, future work should focus on comparing the accuracy of CT myelogram and MRI for evaluation of cervical nerve root presence and viability.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316241234336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are notable differences in how adult patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPI) are evaluated and treated. To better understand existing philosophies, we used the Delphi method to measure and foster consensus on routine use of electrodiagnostic testing, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) myelograms prior to surgery. Panelists were 10 peripheral nerve surgeons board certified in their respective specialties at 5 academic medical centers in the United States. We presented 2 cases (1 complete/pan-BPI and 1 upper trunk BPI) to panelists and asked how often they would order the following preoperative diagnostic tests: electrodiagnostic studies; ultrasound of the brachial plexus; MRI of the brachial plexus; CT myelogram. Our Delphi process included an initial survey with videoconference discussion after the first round. A second survey/videoconference round was conducted to further probe the items that did not reach consensus during the first round. Among the 10 surgeons, there was consensus that prior to brachial plexus surgery electrodiagnostic studies and MRI should be routinely ordered and ultrasound of the brachial plexus should not be routinely ordered. The group did not reach consensus on whether CT myelogram should or should not be routinely ordered. Based on our panel’s discussion, future work should focus on comparing the accuracy of CT myelogram and MRI for evaluation of cervical nerve root presence and viability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
臂丛神经重建术前应常规进行哪些检查?德尔菲小组讨论结果
外伤性臂丛神经损伤(BPI)成人患者的评估和治疗方法存在明显差异。为了更好地了解现有的理念,我们采用德尔菲法对手术前常规使用电诊断测试、超声波、磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)髓核造影进行了测量并达成了共识。小组成员由美国 5 家学术医疗中心的 10 位获得各自专业认证的周围神经外科医生组成。我们向专家组成员展示了 2 个病例(1 个完全/泛 BPI 病例和 1 个上躯干 BPI 病例),并询问他们多长时间会要求进行以下术前诊断检查:电诊断检查、臂丛超声波检查、臂丛 MRI 检查和 CT 髓图检查。我们的德尔菲流程包括初步调查和第一轮后的视频会议讨论。我们还进行了第二轮调查/视频会议,以进一步探讨在第一轮中未达成共识的项目。10 位外科医生一致认为,在臂丛神经手术前应常规进行电诊断检查和核磁共振成像,而不应常规进行臂丛神经超声检查。专家组未就是否应常规进行 CT 髓图检查达成共识。根据我们小组的讨论,未来的工作重点应该是比较 CT 髓图和核磁共振成像在评估颈神经根是否存在和存活方面的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial Interventions to Reduce Post operative Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review The Efficacy of Bone Marrow Stem Cell Therapy in Hip Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: Should Surgeons Be Wearing Ear Protection During Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty? Symptomatic Early Rupture of the InSpace Subacromial Balloon Spacer: A Case Report A Nationwide Comparison of Outcomes and Resource Use in Staged vs Simultaneous Cervical and Lumbar Fusions: A Retrospective Database Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1