Global Perspectives on Innovations in Emergency Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed Methods Study

IF 1.2 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.4103/jets.jets_129_23
Timothy Visclosky, Tara Funk, Chinonso B Agubosim, C. Chaou, Prashant Mahajan
{"title":"Global Perspectives on Innovations in Emergency Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed Methods Study","authors":"Timothy Visclosky, Tara Funk, Chinonso B Agubosim, C. Chaou, Prashant Mahajan","doi":"10.4103/jets.jets_129_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n In mid-2020, the Emergency Medicine Education and Research by Global Experts (EMERGE) network surveyed the emergency response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We demonstrated that innovative measures were being generated at unprecedented rates. Our aim was to build on these findings to develop the first theoretical model with utility in assessing and developing emergency innovations.\n \n \n \n Phase 1 of a two-phase, explanatory sequential mixed methods study was a secondary analysis of the original EMERGE survey. Phase 2 involved follow-up interviews of a purposeful sample of 15 of the original survey respondents, representing 12 countries and all 6 World Health Organization regions. Thematic analysis was performed by three members of the research team.\n \n \n \n Innovation is a nonlinear process in which ideas are developed, implemented, refined, and spread. Ideas grew from departmental needs or the spread of successful innovations from other sites. Development was highly localized, influenced by institutional and regional factors. Obtaining buy-in from relevant stakeholders and addressing various barriers were essential to implementation. The majority of innovations then underwent a process of evolution before some were spread to other institutions through a largely unidirectional flow of information.\n \n \n \n This study proposes the first model for emergency innovation processes and highlights multiple areas for improvement. Understanding how to prioritize departmental needs and the barriers may streamline development and implementation. Furthermore, the apparent unidirectional flow of information demonstrated by our participants suggests both an opportunity and a need for improved information systems. We present a framework for further research and an outline for innovation management.\n","PeriodicalId":15692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_129_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In mid-2020, the Emergency Medicine Education and Research by Global Experts (EMERGE) network surveyed the emergency response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We demonstrated that innovative measures were being generated at unprecedented rates. Our aim was to build on these findings to develop the first theoretical model with utility in assessing and developing emergency innovations. Phase 1 of a two-phase, explanatory sequential mixed methods study was a secondary analysis of the original EMERGE survey. Phase 2 involved follow-up interviews of a purposeful sample of 15 of the original survey respondents, representing 12 countries and all 6 World Health Organization regions. Thematic analysis was performed by three members of the research team. Innovation is a nonlinear process in which ideas are developed, implemented, refined, and spread. Ideas grew from departmental needs or the spread of successful innovations from other sites. Development was highly localized, influenced by institutional and regional factors. Obtaining buy-in from relevant stakeholders and addressing various barriers were essential to implementation. The majority of innovations then underwent a process of evolution before some were spread to other institutions through a largely unidirectional flow of information. This study proposes the first model for emergency innovation processes and highlights multiple areas for improvement. Understanding how to prioritize departmental needs and the barriers may streamline development and implementation. Furthermore, the apparent unidirectional flow of information demonstrated by our participants suggests both an opportunity and a need for improved information systems. We present a framework for further research and an outline for innovation management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于 COVID-19 大流行期间急救护理创新的全球视角:混合方法研究
2020 年年中,全球专家急诊医学教育与研究(EMERGE)网络对 COVID-19 大流行病的应急响应进行了调查。我们发现,创新措施正在以前所未有的速度产生。我们的目标是在这些调查结论的基础上,开发出第一个理论模型,用于评估和开发应急创新措施。 这项分两个阶段进行的解释性顺序混合方法研究的第一阶段是对最初的 EMERGE 调查进行二次分析。第二阶段是对原始调查对象中的 15 个样本进行后续访谈,这些样本代表了 12 个国家和世界卫生组织的所有 6 个地区。专题分析由研究小组的三名成员进行。 创新是一个非线性过程,在这个过程中,各种想法不断发展、实施、完善和传播。这些想法来自部门的需求或其他地方成功创新的传播。受机构和地区因素的影响,发展高度本地化。获得相关利益方的支持和解决各种障碍对实施至关重要。随后,大多数创新都经历了一个演变过程,一些创新才通过基本单向的信息流传播到其他机构。 本研究提出了首个应急创新流程模型,并强调了多个有待改进的领域。了解如何确定部门需求的优先次序以及存在的障碍,可简化开发和实施工作。此外,我们的参与者所表现出的明显的单向信息流表明,改进信息系统既是机遇也是需要。我们提出了进一步研究的框架和创新管理的大纲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Case of Spastic Quadriplegia Remaining after Multiple Traumatic Injuries Complicated by Sepsis and Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome, as well as Delayed Multifocal Microbleeds. Acute Myocardial Infarction with Refractory Cardiogenic Shock after High-Voltage Electrocution: An Intriguing Case. Air Everywhere without Bowel Injury. Bed-up-head-elevated Position versus Supine Sniffing Position in Patients Undergoing Rapid Sequence Intubation Using Direct Laryngoscopy in the Emergency Department - A Randomized Controlled Trial. Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Acute Liver Injury in Sepsis Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1