YOLO vs. CNN Algorithms: A Comparative Study in Masked Face Recognition

Muhammad Ridho Dewanto, M. Farid, Muhammad Abby Rafdi Syah, Aji Akbar Firdaus, Hamzah Arof
{"title":"YOLO vs. CNN Algorithms: A Comparative Study in Masked Face Recognition","authors":"Muhammad Ridho Dewanto, M. Farid, Muhammad Abby Rafdi Syah, Aji Akbar Firdaus, Hamzah Arof","doi":"10.15294/sji.v11i1.48723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This research investigates the effectiveness of YOLO (You Only Look Once) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) in real-time face mask recognition, addressing the challenges posed by mask-wearing in infectious disease prevention.Method: Utilizing a diverse dataset and employing YOLO's object detection and a combined Haar Cascade Algorithm with CNN, the study evaluated key performance indicators, including accuracy, framerate, and F1 Score.Results: Results indicated that CNN outperformed YOLO in accuracy (99.3% vs. 79.3%) but operated at a slightly lower framerate. YOLO excelled in recall and precision, presenting a compelling choice for specific application needs. The research underscores the importance of considering factors beyond accuracy for informed decision-making in the realm of face mask recognition.Novelty: This research evaluates the real-time performance of YOLO and CNN algorithms in masked face recognition, highlighting the crucial balance between framerate efficiency and detection accuracy.","PeriodicalId":30781,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of Informatics","volume":"44 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v11i1.48723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This research investigates the effectiveness of YOLO (You Only Look Once) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) in real-time face mask recognition, addressing the challenges posed by mask-wearing in infectious disease prevention.Method: Utilizing a diverse dataset and employing YOLO's object detection and a combined Haar Cascade Algorithm with CNN, the study evaluated key performance indicators, including accuracy, framerate, and F1 Score.Results: Results indicated that CNN outperformed YOLO in accuracy (99.3% vs. 79.3%) but operated at a slightly lower framerate. YOLO excelled in recall and precision, presenting a compelling choice for specific application needs. The research underscores the importance of considering factors beyond accuracy for informed decision-making in the realm of face mask recognition.Novelty: This research evaluates the real-time performance of YOLO and CNN algorithms in masked face recognition, highlighting the crucial balance between framerate efficiency and detection accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
YOLO 算法与 CNN 算法:蒙面人脸识别对比研究
目的:本研究调查了 YOLO(你只看一次)和卷积神经网络(CNN)在实时人脸面具识别中的有效性,以应对在传染病预防中佩戴面具所带来的挑战:研究利用一个多样化的数据集,采用 YOLO 的对象检测和 Haar Cascade 算法与 CNN 的组合,评估了关键性能指标,包括准确率、帧速率和 F1 分数:结果表明,CNN 的准确率高于 YOLO(99.3% 对 79.3%),但帧速率略低。YOLO 在召回率和精确度方面表现出色,是满足特定应用需求的理想选择。新颖性:这项研究评估了 YOLO 和 CNN 算法在蒙面人脸识别中的实时性能,强调了帧速率效率和检测准确性之间的关键平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Study of Random Forest and Double Random Forest Models from View Points of Their Interpretability Comparative Analysis of LSTM Neural Network and SVM for USD Exchange Rate Prediction: A Study on Different Training Data Scenarios Knowledge Discovery from Confusion Matrix of Pruned CART in Imbalanced Microarray Data Ovarian Cancer Classification Comparison of Discriminant Analysis and Support Vector Machine on Mixed Categorical and Continuous Independent Variables for COVID-19 Patients Data The Comparison of K-Nearest Neighbors and Random Forest Algorithm to Recognize Indonesian Sign Language in a Real-Time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1